⨯ Did you know we have a Forum? Come and say hi to the wider community!

Ubisoft have announced that their third-person hero-based melee fighting game FOR HONOR will be blocking all SteamOS / Linux players on September 10th.

The game uses Easy Anti-Cheat which is currently enabled for Linux, but they plan to disable it - making it another game that will no longer be playable across Linux Desktop, Steam Deck and Steam Machine.

In an announcement on the official site they said:

"To reinforce a fair competitive environment, the team is introducing additional player safety measures. We are removing For Honor from the Linux platform to ensure a safer environment for our players as we cannot meaningfully deploy protection on this platform. This means that For Honor will no longer be playable on Steam Deck starting September 10th. We will continue to investigate different ways to improve our anti-cheat with the possibility of reopening the platform in the future."

FOR HONOR screenshot - Ubisoft

A real shame - any game that intentionally blocks Linux is a loss for the platform. We've seen the same in the past with the likes of the Battlefield series, Apex Legends, GTA V and more listed on our anti-cheat page.

Hopefully Linux will continue pulling in more gamers and grow, so that these bigger publishers will one day be unable to just block Linux. Or perhaps Valve will be able to do something about it so publishers have some kind of system that they feel is good enough to secure their games from cheaters.

🌐 External Sources: ubisoft.com
Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
20 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly.
See more from me
All posts need to follow our rules. Please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Readers can also email us for any issues or concerns.
51 comments
Page: 1/3
  Go to:
Woodlandor 1 Sep 2026
1) Never heard of this game.
2) They spelled Honour wrong πŸ˜‚
seflasporin 1 Sep 2026
User Avatar
to ensure a safer environment for our players
This is the same company that says you need to enter your password every time you launch a game released before 2015 because of "security" when it's actually because they couldn't be bothered to port of the Ubisoft Club rewards system to Ubisoft Connect properly.
Linas 1 Sep 2026
Valve should really have a negative compatibility rating below "unsupported" for this kind of nonsense.
DrNick 1 Sep 2026
User Avatar
I expect nothing from Ubisoft and I'm still disappointed. So glad I stopped spending money on their garbage products years ago. Sorry for the devs though.
doragasu 1 Sep 2026
User Avatar
Is this justified? (e.g. were there players cheating under Linux?) or is it just shitty Ubisoft being shitty.
StalePopcorn 1 Sep 2026
Welp, Ubisoft, fk you too πŸ‘πŸΌ
TwixGedoens 1 Sep 2026
User Avatar
Now that is a real shame. I haven't meaningfully kept in touch with For Honor in years, so I wonder, if their decision comes from real data, or if they just want to keep appearances of ranked mode "health" with their extremely limited budget.

Most games/publishers/devs don't even bother to test, whether an intrusive anti-cheat is really necessary from the very start, especially in the fighting game genre (see: 2XKO, Marvel Tokon). So I have mixed feelings about this, as they have "allowed" Linux players for some time, but now officially put an end to it.
Pyrate 1 Sep 2026
User Avatar
It's especially moronic to pull this now when there are multiple systems in the market and millions of players using the OS. They missed the train to get away with this by a few years.
melkemind 1 Sep 2026
User Avatar
The irony of having "Honor" in the name of the game while dishonorably blocking paying customers is pretty wild.
tamodolo 1 Sep 2026
User Avatar
wait! There was an actual player base on Linux for this game? I though this was abandonware.
pb 1 Sep 2026
User Avatar
Quoting: LinasValve should really have a negative compatibility rating below "unsupported" for this kind of nonsense.
"Intentionally unsupported"
Charmander 1 Sep 2026
User Avatar
Seems like a wildly nuclear choice to remove paying customers. Couldn’t they just make a local/lan or bot matches only option?
Savor592 1 Sep 2026
User Avatar
Quoting: pb
Quoting: LinasValve should really have a negative compatibility rating below "unsupported" for this kind of nonsense.
"Intentionally unsupported"
I think we can at least make that an unofficial steam tag, can't we?
benstor214 1 Sep 2026
User Avatar
Can Linux gamers ask for a refund?
Nickname 1 Sep 2026
User Avatar
Going to leave a negative review now I guess...
LoudTechie 1 Sep 2026
User Avatar
Quoting: doragasuIs this justified? (e.g. were there players cheating under Linux?) or is it just shitty Ubisoft being shitty.
I can't find a market for Linux cheats, nor open source projects with linux for honor cheats.
As such I don't think its a big group, but I didn't find a big group of linux players either, so they might simply have introduced more stringent requirements for Windows and accept Linux falling of the wagon.

Last edited by LoudTechie on 1 Sep 2026 at 11:42 am UTC
Beta Version 1 Sep 2026
Now I'm worried about The Division 2.
scaine 1 Sep 2026
User Avatar
Ubisoft, EA, Epic and Bungie have been dead to me for a while, but the way some of them are going back to older titles and fucking over non-Windows players really is a new low. EA are doing it with Javelin (e.g. Apex Legends) and now this from Ubi.

Friends don't let friends buy games from these scammers.
doragasu 1 Sep 2026
User Avatar
Quoting: pb
Quoting: LinasValve should really have a negative compatibility rating below "unsupported" for this kind of nonsense.
"Intentionally unsupported"
Or maybe

"Actively Blocked"
syylk 1 Sep 2026
Quoting: LinasValve should really have a negative compatibility rating below "unsupported" for this kind of nonsense.
"Broken on purpose"

or

"Hostile to Deck"

or something along these lines, to highlight the intention of removing the support, versus never having it in first place.

Also, when these things happen, I'd really love to know, 3, 6 or 12 months down the line, if the cheater problem is really resolved.

More often than not, we never hear from them again (hello Rockstar!), the cheating stays rampant, and the proof that their "fix" didn't fix a darn thing is there in plain sight.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon Logo Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal Logo PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register