Confused on Steam Play and Proton? Be sure to check out our guide.
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

Richard Stallman has resigned from the Free Software Foundation and MIT

By - | Views: 59,590

Richard Stallman, founder of the Free Software Foundation has resigned and he's also left his position in CSAIL at MIT.

Why is this significant? Stallman and the FSF were responsible for the creation of the GNU Project, widely used GNU licenses like the GPL, the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) and more that were used in the creation of Linux.

Posted on the FSF website last night was this notice:

 On September 16, 2019, Richard M. Stallman, founder and president of the Free Software Foundation, resigned as president and from its board of directors. The board will be conducting a search for a new president, beginning immediately. Further details of the search will be published on fsf.org.

Stallman also noted on stallman.org how he's stepped away from MIT as well, with the below statement:

I am resigning effective immediately from my position in CSAIL at MIT. I am doing this due to pressure on MIT and me over a series of misunderstandings and mischaracterizations.

The question is—why? Well, an article on Vice picked up on comments Stallman made around convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Unsurprisingly, this caused quite a lot of outrage inside and outside the Linux community.

Not long after Neil McGovern, the GNOME Executive Director, made a blog post about it where they said they asked the FSF to cancel their membership. McGovern also noted that other people who they "greatly respect are doing the same" and that GNOME would sever their "historical ties between GNOME, GNU and the FSF" if Stallman did not step down.

McGovern of GNOME wasn't the only one to speak out about it, as the Software Freedom Conservancy also put out a post calling for Stallman to step down and no doubt there's others I'm not aware of.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Misc
19 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly came back to check on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. Find me on Mastodon.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
116 comments
Page: «6/12»
  Go to:

amatai Sep 17, 2019
The e-mails have leaked, anyone can take a peak and read what has really be written in it. Better than reading stuff from some journalist that will turn him in either a hero or a devil - he is neither-.

That guy was going to fall one day or another, he writes stupid mail like that on a regular basis. He totally misjudged the crisis where the MIT is and that, this time, it was the one too much.

The stuff at the MIT show is lack on public relation. He can be a programmer in the FSF but he can't be president. I rather have someone better at representing free software. That will let good ol' Stallman plenty of time to finish Hurd.
tonR Sep 17, 2019
Sometimes, it's better to keep your mouth shut and 'follow the flow' than say something that will stirring up many hornet nests.

That's my motto of life, even do it sound's hypocritical.
Because at the end of the day, "Saya mahu terus hidup".
niarbeht Sep 17, 2019
Quoting: kaimanPersonally, I really wonder though how people can hang Stallman for his words, while nobody so much raises an eyebrow at the way Epstein's case was handled by the legal system. Makes me think priorities aren't what they ought to be these days.

Have you been on the Internet in the past couple months? Because everyone's pretty unhappy about Epstein's murder suicide. Everyone knows it was a coverup is totally a legit suicide.

Sarcasm off now, quit the bullshit. People being pissed about Epstein doesn't mean they can't be pissed about RMS writing apologetics for rapists. People in sexual slavery are incapable of consent. Underage people are legally incapable of consent. Whether the sex slave is being forced to pretend to consent or not doesn't matter, it's still immoral, it's still unethical, it's still a crime.
Arehandoro Sep 17, 2019
Quoting: namikoBeing "canceled" means being too offensive to work with, associate with or even to be spoken positively about at the worst.

Are some things so offensive as to make it necessary to remove someone from the public sphere, sometimes permanently? (banning, firing, refusing to associate with, maybe even being fined or arrested depending on where you live, etc.)

I don't know where the boundary on offense should be because I can't predict the future, times change, laws and policies also change in a waxing and waning of liberal to conservative and back again (in a general sense, no political parties implied). If this kind of de-personing is going to be the default, we're isolating a lot of people. There's a dark path to be gone down when we start thinking people are permanently irredeemable, even if they sincerely apologize. Or even if they are accepted again, can we say they're sincerely accepted, or is there a permanent, invisible "scarlet letter" of sorts that will hang over their heads indefinitely?

It feels good to be a part of a group that's "better" than the "bad" one(s), it's a rush that's probably chemically addictive. That's why I can't see "cancel culture" stopping anytime soon, it just feels too good to be more "right" than the person or group being accused.

If there's no road to forgiveness, can any of us honestly say that we're above reproach when it comes to our words or actions? Whether or not we think what Stallman's done or said is acceptable doesn't matter, it matters because we'd want a chance at forgiveness if we were in his shoes.

This is pretty much what I wanted to say, but couldn't find the right words for it. Thanks :)

Quoting: chrBut more trust (maybe sometimes?) and more empathy and more calming down and being friendly is what we all need.

THIS :)


Last edited by Arehandoro on 17 September 2019 at 4:31 pm UTC
t3g Sep 17, 2019
Quoting: GuestHow will this affect Linux gaming in the long run?

No effect as RMS condemned non-free software which most games are.
monnef Sep 17, 2019
Well, as others wrote, another victim of cancel culture. Sadly, it has become a norm, we live in an age of Code Of Conducts which are crafted and pushed through not to improve work/community relations, but only to ostracize people with opposing opinions (often political ones). Where are the times when it would make it headlines if some (semi) public figure was banned from social network or kicked from work because of politely stating facts - as in based on science, not feelings or opinions. If you don't believe me, just search for James Damore and read his memo (I believe there was also a famous evolutionary biologist kicked out from university, because he dared to voice to press a scientific fact accepted by overwhelming majority of scientists in the field; or an ex-muslim kicked from twitter because he quoted the holy book).

Quoting: Liam Dawethe comments can be closed at any time.

Yeah, threatening to closing discussion, because someone can't handle opposing views (like at the Ion Fury article)? When you want a civilized discussion/community, why not just censor naughty words, if it becomes heated, instead of ruining it for everybody? ?

It is interesting, looking back in time, I realize I gradually stopped reading all news portals which started censoring opinions they disagreed with or removing discussions entirely. I guess it's probably because there are many times when comments are as, or even more, useful than the article itself (e.g. pointing out factual errors or biases, updates to the news, links to other sources if a reader wants to educate himself on the topic).
Kithop Sep 17, 2019
RMS has long suffered from the 'you can be technically correct, and yet still act like a raging asshole about it' syndrome that Linus Torvalds, etc. also suffer from.

I don't like how media outlets have basically stretched and almost misquoted him in their headlines, because it makes it all sound like this is the only mis-step he's made over the years in this area. If that were the case, you'd not be wrong to be at least a little upset that this seems like a disproportionate reaction.

But that's the thing - in reality, this is more 'the straw that broke the camel's back'. RMS has been problematic for years, but the Epstein <-> MIT link was the kick at the end.

You can probably dig deeper if you're so inclined (here's one place to start - where Vice got their info.

I wish the FSF best of luck in finding someone new to champion their cause.


Last edited by Kithop on 17 September 2019 at 4:53 pm UTC
Doc Angelo Sep 17, 2019
I'm absolutely baffled how many people here in the comments simply accept shitty social rules as if they should not be different. One is to be silent about a topic that is controversial? Well... the situation is this: What is controversial is contemporary and changes all the time.

We shouldn't use the age of information to hold this info against each other. That's really the worst way to handle the new world and the new international networked society. It is not useful to discredit opinion A about topic X because the same person had opinion B about topic Y. We are blogging, chatting, posting, commenting and so on all the time. But as soon as we have as bigger amount of followers or have a managing or leading position, we have to be even more silent about topics?

Do leaders of countries have to be almost silent about almost anything, then? Of course not. Because then they would just be mouth pieces of the public opinion because they want to get re-elected.

People can't seriously think that this is acceptable or even to be defended. It should be gotten rid of.
Doc Angelo Sep 17, 2019
Also... I'm absolutely not happy about the GNOME Foundation pulling such an publicity stunt. GNOME originates from the GNU project in the past, and the leader of GNOME reads a fucking VICE article for the latest news on RMS?
Liam Dawe Sep 17, 2019
Quoting: monnef
Quoting: Liam Dawethe comments can be closed at any time.

Yeah, threatening to closing discussion, because someone can't handle opposing views (like at the Ion Fury article)? When you want a civilized discussion/community, why not just censor naughty words, if it becomes heated, instead of ruining it for everybody? ?

It is interesting, looking back in time, I realize I gradually stopped reading all news portals which started censoring opinions they disagreed with or removing discussions entirely. I guess it's probably because there are many times when comments are as, or even more, useful than the article itself (e.g. pointing out factual errors or biases, updates to the news, links to other sources if a reader wants to educate himself on the topic).
It has absolutely nothing to do with opposing views. It's about people having respect, once people start losing that and going wild, comments can be closed or offending users posts removed. If people follow our rules, there's no issue.

As I've said for a long time, opposing views are welcome. Respect however, has to be shown to fellow readers.

For pointing out corrections, we have a dedicated bit above comments in a very defined box for people to use any time.


Last edited by Liam Dawe on 17 September 2019 at 5:12 pm UTC
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.