Don't want to see articles from a certain category? When logged in, go to your User Settings and adjust your feed in the Content Preferences section where you can block tags!
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

Saints Row 2 & 3 Are Being Ported By Virtual Programming

By - | Views: 23,792
tagline-image
With earlier news about another Saints Row game, a member of the community sent word that Virtual Programming have updated their website to include Saints Row 2 & 3 as in development.

We know their ports are still a bit controversial, but after how well they have done recently I think they deserve some pretty high praise. Their recent test-port of Arma 3 for example had beautiful performance, and I still hope it's promoted to a full port with VP.

If you don't remember, they don't port games "natively", but they use what people refer to as a "wrapper". The reason they still get flak as people are rather bitter from the initial port performance of The Witcher 2, but they have been getting better and better, and they are proving themselves.

They state the ports are currently in beta, and so they should be out before too long.

This doesn't really change my thoughts on it, as it's a great way to quickly boost our library, but how do you feel?

This also suggests that Saints Row IV and Saints Row: Gat out of Hell will be ported by someone else. Since neither are on VP's website.

Thanks for letting us know @k4os77. Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
0 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly came back to check on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. Find me on Mastodon.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
35 comments
Page: «3/4»
  Go to:

melkemind Oct 9, 2015
Quoting: Mountain ManNow, are you ready to discuss this like an adult? Or are you going to throw another hissy fit?

And which part was my hissy fit, the "LOL" or my patented sarcasm tags?
Mountain Man Oct 9, 2015
I see you've realized that you can "like" your own comments. That's cute.

Since you apparently have nothing more to say, I'll assume you concede the point and will wish a good day.
tartif Oct 9, 2015
Quoting: HoriI also have The Witcher 2 but it is one of their early ports... can you guys please tell me if the port was updated and if it is working fine now?

I played it start to finish a few weeks ago and performance was fantastic. Nvidia 970 card. I think setting __GL_THREADED_OPTIMIZATIONS=1 made a big positive difference.

Note that this game is more demanding than Bioshock Infinite so if Bioshock doesn't play well on your computer, The Witcher 2 will probably be worse.
mao_dze_dun Oct 9, 2015
I'm happy to see more and more people are recognizing VP are actually the good guys. Native ports have been getting worse in performance and more limited in hardware support. They hardly do anything good for the cause of Linux gaming.
And sorry to burst your bubble, people, but Shadow of Mordor is NOT a good port. It's mediocre one, at least in terms of performance. People with much older hardware can play the game on Windows as compared to Linux.
I'm truly sad to see so many people are still obsessed with "native ports". Native ports have in general been quite unimpressive. Say what you want, but the only constant performance progression I've observed lately has been with the wrapper games.
Ilya Oct 9, 2015
I hope Saints Row IV and Gat (which is a standalone SRIV mod IIRC) get a native port. I really don't mind SR2 & 3 being VP, their last ports have been good and the games are unlikely to get ported otherwise. Unfortunately I already own them both. I haven't played 2 though, and I'm sure I can find a friend who doesn't own them ^^
melkemind Oct 9, 2015
Quoting: Mountain ManI see you've realized that you can "like" your own comments. That's cute.

Since you apparently have nothing more to say, I'll assume you concede the point and will wish a good day.

That seems to be your speciality: assuming (that and making condescending remarks with no knowledge to back it up).

Regarding your "point", you've made none, so there's really nothing left to say. If you want to show me a Feral or Aspyr port that has performed equal to or better than the Windows version, then we can talk.
ProfessorKaos64 Oct 9, 2015
Can't wait to play these games :)
Mblackwell Oct 10, 2015
I actually wonder why Company of Heroes 2 is slow... running the benchmark it appears to hit all CPU cores evenly, at about 50%, the GPU isn't being completely bogged down although RAM usage is rather high (but not enough to hit swap).

Shadow of Mordor is a hog though, but the three settings that make the biggest difference are: Shadow Quality, Ambient Occlusion, and Texture Quality. If you have Texture Quality set to Ultra it's better to stick with Low or Medium Texture Filtering as you'll hit VRAM limits pretty quickly otherwise, but you can get away with it just barely sometimes. Really just stick with High for that unless you own a Titan or 980Ti... Anyway the thing is that the game EATS system RAM. Even on Windows it uses 6GB+ at pretty much all times. On my system most tasks are generally taking 1-2GB in the background, so that pretty much maxes things out since I've only got 8GB installed. So if the settings exceed the GPU's limit to the point where it has to hit System RAM instead you'll spend all of your time in and out of Swap since System is already full.. I'm guessing people that have 12 or 16GB of RAM have a much better time with SoM.

Anyway, I'm excited to finally be able to play Saints Row III. I bought it on a whim years ago but haven't actually played it since it never worked in Wine. It's been awhile since I've played a GTA-like game.


Last edited by Mblackwell on 10 October 2015 at 1:00 am UTC
GustyGhost Oct 10, 2015
Quoting: IlyaI hope Saints Row IV and Gat (which is a standalone SRIV mod IIRC) get a native port. I really don't mind SR2 & 3 being VP, their last ports have been good and the games are unlikely to get ported otherwise. Unfortunately I already own them both. I haven't played 2 though, and I'm sure I can find a friend who doesn't own them ^^

Agree, the general rule should be ~3 years or older > wrap it. Any newer than that and the game is better served native.
Beamboom Oct 10, 2015
Quote"The reason they still get flak as people are rather bitter from the initial port performance of The Witcher 2"
I don't believe that's the reason at all, not anymore. They've long confirmed for all that their wrapper is running well indeed.
This very site had an excellent article a while ago that presented a long range of rational reasons why VRs closed-source wrapper is not the way forward for Linux gaming.

My personal problem with it is that it's not native code. Not because native code is guaranteed to run better (as we know in real-life examples now) but for the longer term advantages. But as the article I refer to also pointed out - if VR instead had joined the Wine crew in their efforts to optimize that solution, it would have gained Linux as a whole a great deal more.

I'm still gonna play'em games though. :)


Last edited by Beamboom on 10 October 2015 at 5:28 am UTC
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.