We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

During Gamelab 2019 at a panel hosted by GamesIndustry.biz, Paradox Interactive's former CEO Fredrik Wester (now the Executive Chairman of the Board at Paradox Interactive) talked about the cut "platform holders" take from sales and they're not impressed.

The one this always comes back to is Valve's store Steam, which has a standard 30% cut they take from developers. Although, they did tweak this for higher earning games in December last year so for games that earn $10 million it's reduced to 25% and 20% at $50 million and that does include money from DLC, in-game transactions, Steam market fees and so on.

Wester said "I think the 70/30 revenue split is outrageous", noting that it was likely established in the '70s by Warner Bros when distributing physical media like boxed VHS tapes and so on saying "That was physical. It cost a lot of money". Wester went on to say "This doesn't cost anything." and thanked Epic Games for what they're doing with their much smaller 12% cut.

Claiming it "doesn't cost anything" isn't quite right though, considering all the services Steam actually provides including things like Cloud Saving, Achievements, Leaderboards, Valve Anti-Cheat (VAC), Inventory Services and quite a bit more. Valve also provide free keys to developers to sell on other stores like itch.io, Humble Store, Fanatical and many others (there's a huge amount of Steam key stores out there) of which Valve don't see a penny from. That's on top of various open source projects Valve fund too like DXVK, improving KWin and a ton more those are just two very recent examples.

Wester isn't the only one who has mentioned this of course, former Valve staffer Richard Geldreich said on Twitter back in April:

Steam was killing PC gaming. It was a 30% tax on an entire industry. It was unsustainable. You have no idea how profitable Steam was for Valve. It was a virtual printing press. It distorted the entire company. Epic is fixing this for all gamers.

The State of the Industry Survey done by GDC also noted how only 6% of developers asked thought Valve's 30% cut was justified.

What are your thoughts?

Hat tip to Mr. Doomguy in Discord.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Editorial
12 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly came back to check on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. Find me on Mastodon.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
75 comments
Page: «2/8»
  Go to:

Liam Dawe Jul 2, 2019
Just as some added perspective, Valve seem to take a large amount of money from the Dota 2 Battle Pass.
sub Jul 2, 2019
Quote"This doesn't cost anything."

Sure, Steam should be basically free.

This guy fits the EGS bandwagon quite well.
TheSyldat Jul 2, 2019
Quoting: GuestI'm not saying Valve are evil. I might have given that impression, so allow me to say that they are investing in areas that are useful to GNU/Linux users. That doesn't mean they don't need a bit of competition though. That 30% cut is from lack of competition more than anything else, and I think developers are starting to suffer slightly from it. If only the epic store could adjust to being _healthy_ competition, then it might be alright.

Hell if anything the cut percentage should go up the bigger the sales and go down for indies ... but that's just me being a commie ...
gradyvuckovic Jul 2, 2019
I feel like so many people, including the Paradox CEO and Epic Games CEO, just completely ignore the fact that it's not strictly a 30% cut on purpose and just feel the need to constantly say '30%' as a form of misinformation.

It's a 20%-30% cut, depending on sales. For almost all games that sell over 200,000 copies, it's actually a 25% cut which is below industry standard. And it only applies to sales on Steam, not to sales outside of Steam.

For high selling games that are also sold outside of Steam via key resellers, etc, the true cut could be as low as 15%-18%.
gojul Jul 2, 2019
Steam provides a lot of network gaming for free while it is not free for them and so on. While it is true that in some cases Valve cut is expensive given all the services provided and the ability to buy keys outside of Steam it is not that much.
Ardje Jul 2, 2019
Quoting: gradyvuckovicI feel like so many people, including the Paradox CEO and Epic Games CEO, just completely ignore the fact that it's not strictly a 30% cut on purpose and just feel the need to constantly say '30%' as a form of misinformation.
They also seem to leave out any information about what Valve is actually spending money on, what none of the other companies are doing: R&D... open R&D that benefit those other companies too.
If Valve did not exist, we were probable locked into a store with DX10 as the best graphics API, paying $120 for a game.
People need to adjust to the idea that development costs money, and Valve can take a fee from a sale to pour that into development. In return the development usually benefits all.
Wine took huge leaps, and wine is also used on androids to play old windows games (with an x86 emulation layer).
If this continues, we could be playing DX12 games on android, without involvement of Valve...
So yeah, all those other stores should first make a list of unselfish contributions they made to the gaming industry.
If none, screw them.
For now it is Steam, GOG, humblebundle or itch.io that I will be supporting. In that order though, I am lazy.
Eike Jul 2, 2019
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
Quote"This doesn't cost anything."

They really should open their 0% cut store, then.
huyderman Jul 2, 2019
I think Wester is being a bit hypocritical here, as Paradox Development Studio, under his watch, greatly leveraged the SteamWorks services to grow to where they are now. They've relied on it for multiplayer, distribution, patching, internal playtesting, and the mod workshop. I love Paradox, but it's a bit disingenuous to not acknowledge the symbiotic relationship they have had with Valve for many years before they now are getting big enough to grow their own infrastructure...
Schattenspiegel Jul 2, 2019
Interesting statement by a publisher that favours an addiction based price model on top of making the customer the ware by gathering telemetry...
What is the average publisher's cut, btw while we are talking money?


Last edited by Schattenspiegel on 2 July 2019 at 11:25 am UTC
Lomkey Jul 2, 2019
View PC info
  • Supporter
I remember talks about on YouTube valve taking a lost on transaction cost in other countries so player not paying that bill. I do think 30% thats abit to high, but 12% is way to low to keep a store going with out cutting cost.


Last edited by Lomkey on 2 July 2019 at 11:27 am UTC
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.