Support us on Patreon to keep GamingOnLinux alive. This ensures all of our main content remains free for everyone. Just good, fresh content! Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal. You can also buy games using our partner links for GOG and Humble Store.
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.
The Witcher 3 is something Linux users have been practically begging to have, but the problem is that it seems it will likely never come to Linux. An ex-Virtual Programming developer has taken to reddit explaining why this may have happened.

I should stress, for our own record here that this is not the official word from Virtual Programming or CD Projekt RED. This is the personal opinion of an ex-VP developer.

Here's the issue: The Linux version of The Witcher 2 was released in a poor state, it had poor performance and just didn't really work well at all. It was later fixed-up and last time I tried it, the performance was absolutely fine for me. The real problem, is the amount of hate that was sent towards the porters Virtual Programming and directly to CD Projekt RED as well. Even I personally saw some of the hate that was sent their way and it was downright idiotic and absolutely uncalled for.

I will absolutely hold my hands up as well, I made mistakes around it since I simply didn't know enough at the time, and to be honest three years ago I was still learning a lot about everything. I later corrected what I said, as I always aim to.

Writing on reddit, this developer said (source):
QuoteI agree, things were not right on release... but the vocality of people went way beyond that. It was an all out hate campaign against VP, against CDPR for "lying about the port being native". I attempted to help people out in my own time and got absolutely roasted and abused for it.

The community needs to realise it simply cannot justify this sort of behaviour if they want to convince devs and publishers to support them. There is no excuse.


It seems we may have also seen a port of The Witcher 1 as well, as the developer also said (source):
QuoteThe vitriol was unbelievable. Yes we messed up the performance on release but we put it right. However a huge hate campaign ensued. Both VP and CDPR got lots of vengeful hate mail sent to them. I cannot help but feel this damaged CDPR's view of the Linux platform irrevocably.

They certainly didnt blame us, because they had us work on a Mac port of Witcher 1 to replace the non-functioning Wineskin version. The same port would have ran on Linux too with very little extra work, but they were not interested in releasing it.


There's also this post from another user, who said at the time The Witcher 2 released for Linux, CDProjekt apparently lost a fair amount on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Apparently due to such a big backlash from the community about the initial release quality. I haven't verified that myself, but if true it would certainly make CDProjekt rather against doing another Linux port with anyone.

This is sad, really sad. I hope this makes a few people reconsider their attitude when talking to developer about the performance of ports. Performance can be worked on and fixed, burnt bridges are harder (and sometimes impossible) to fix.

This reminds me of the time the Blizzard President responded to a small petition asking for Linux ports of their games. The response to the petition was really nice to see from such a big company and truthfully the response I fully expected, but the original statement in reply to it from the petition author (now deleted by the author, but captured in my article) was downright childish and idiotic.

Yes problems are annoying, but throwing insults around helps no one and yes it does make us look bad. I get where people are coming from, to an extent, since some games do end up getting left in a terribly broken state for a long time and sometimes forever. However, in this case VP did good and continued working and now, as stated previously, The Witcher 2 seems fine. Their others ports are generally pretty decent too.

I just hope in future that this developer who got a massive amount of hate and CD Projekt RED can look past it somehow, for all the fans of their franchise on Linux.

Note: I personally spoke to this developer about publishing this with their approval, in the hopes that it might get a few people to re-think their initial attitude towards problems in games. Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Editorial
62 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly came back to check on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. Find me on Mastodon.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
331 comments
Page: «7/34»
  Go to:

Guest Jul 3, 2017
Quoting: LeopardSo being minority is equal to accepting consequences?

Let's put it with an example : At X country there are two kind of people.

One with the white skin ( i'm not a racist) others with black skins.

Black skins are most of that X country , while white skins are minorities.

They go for shopping at a mall. But this mall has a policy : Black skins can complain about bad products and mall management can go with it but whenever a white skinned guy complains about a bad product they forbid him to enter this mall ever again.

We are gamers too , we're not different than Windows gamers. Having a small share doesn't mean being treated as second class citizens and expecting that " Linux users should be greatful for that port , even if it is broke "

Why the hell we would do that? If a product is bad we have right to shout that to developers.

Of course , personal attacks are not welcomed but a backslash is pretty normal when a product is not meeting expectations.

No, I never said anything like that. What you describe is racism. CDPR is not interested in how we look or where we're from. They had to decide if they should provide a version of their game for a system with a very small user base. At first they wanted to do so, but then they reconsidered. That is not racism, it's not even OSsism, it's free market. They are not denying us a right to do anything. The product people got so angry about was fixed and works fine now. It seems CDPR just decided, to not repeat the experience..
Criticizing a product is completely ok, but what is so problematic about just staying friendly?
Lakorta Jul 3, 2017
Quoting: Guest
Quoting: lucifertdarkIf they're going to turn tail & run because of a few small minded people then they might as well shut up shop altogether as it's only going to get much worse now thanks to this.

They already did - on Linux. Thats the point.
I thought that was more like a guess than a fact?
finaldest Jul 3, 2017
Lets all be truthful here shall we.

There are devs that somewhat bring it on themselves by releasing poor or broken software however the behaviour that was shown is no excuse and its unacceptable and should not be tolerated.

The problem lies with the entire gaming community as a whole across all platforms. The sheer amount of hate and abuse thrown around along with pathetic arguments and flame wars is getting out of hand.

the only way to change this is to put a stop to it once and for all and both gamers and devs need to take responsibility and start working together to stamp this problem out.

Its time the gaming community grew up.
Shmerl Jul 3, 2017
Quoting: webcreatureThat is not racism, it's not even OSsism, it's free market. They are not denying us a right to do anything. The product people got so angry about was fixed and works fine now. It seems CDPR just decided, to not repeat the experience..

Not exactly. CDPR started working on the Linux version of TW3, communicated multiple times that it's coming, and then cancelled it without any explanation. That was already well after the release of TW2 for Linux by the way.

See this timeline: https://www.gamingonlinux.com/wiki/The_Witcher_3_Linux_port

In the summer of 2015 they were still working on it. Some problems happened after that, and year later they already changed the tone of their messages to "we are looking into" and eventually "nothing to say about it". TW2 for Linux came out in May 2014.

So, something must have happened in between summer of 2015 and spring of 2016, that borked the project. And I doubt it could be some outrage, that happened in 2014.


Last edited by Shmerl on 4 July 2017 at 12:57 am UTC
HadBabits Jul 3, 2017
Yeah, no, the Linux community reminds me a lot of the 'Atheist community'. Some don't even really consider it to be an important part of their identity, wouldn't mention it in a conversation where it isn't particularly relevant, right? Then you have your zealous Dawkins fan-boy types (not to dis Dawkins' works) who feel the need to show their superiority to the brainwashed masses, using this particular niche as a way to bolster their intelligence. They've found their cause, their source of validation, and their very dedicated to it

For lack of a better word, these 'Geek' communities can produce some nasty people (I imagine there are parallels to this kind of effect in all communities to some extent). Maybe because we tend to be more isolated, or the fact our preferred medium of communication is full of echo chambers like a confirmation bias's wet dream. I've seen, fortunately not too often, Linux zealots spit some serious venom, in a way that implies they've no self awareness :|

Combine that and the fact that we're a small platform and I'm not too surprised they didn't bother. Not that I don't think the issues raised weren't legit, but this took place during a time when the call for native ports was in full effect (something I will admit I took some solidarity in), and I recall the responses resonating that. And complaints of the performance were also justified. It's the intensity of some of the responses I disapprove of, as it hurts us and our community's image.

All that said, we also do have some of the greatest people. Some of the smartest people, which may explain the 2-Smart-4-U people mentioned before. But we also have some of the most helpful and appreciative as well. I've been told this by developers when I've bug tested or written articles about their games. That's why I'm still glad to be a part of this community :) <3


Last edited by HadBabits on 3 July 2017 at 11:51 pm UTC
slobberingant Jul 3, 2017
Quoting: Guest
Quoting: KimmoKMthe backlash at the time was 100% justified

People emailing me personally saying they hoped i would fucking die was justified?

This is just messed up. I'm sorry that this happened to you. Showing displeasure on a public forum against a company is one thing. Personally contacting their staff is just wrong.
I finished Witcher 2 last week. I thought the port was awesome. Thank you.
Guest Jul 3, 2017
Quoting: Guest
Quoting: lucifertdarkIf they're going to turn tail & run because of a few small minded people then they might as well shut up shop altogether as it's only going to get much worse now thanks to this.

They already did - on Linux. Thats the point.
Quoting: razing32
Quoting: g000hI find quite a few things upsetting in the world of Linux gaming.

I really loved "Legend of Grimrock" - It was one of the first decent games I played on Linux (bought it on GOG) about 4 years ago. So happy to be able to play that wonderful game on Linux. And then, the next one - Legend of Grimrock 2 - What's going on, it's not on Linux. Well, I picked it up anyway, and thanks to WINE I was still able to play it on Linux although I would have much preferred a native version. (Devs at Almost Human - fingers crossed, then I can play it again, *properly* .)

And then I look at other titles which have done similarly:
The Witcher 2 - Hurray, it's on Linux. The Witcher 3 - Aww no. There isn't a Linux port.
The Banner Saga - cool, a Linux port. The Banner Saga 2 - No Linux port.
Shadow Warrior (2013) - Played it on Linux recently. Shadow Warrior 2 - It should be coming to Linux eventually, but nothing so far, sniffle.
Codemaster's F1 2015 came to Linux. F1 2016 - No Linux port ( due to not enough interest in the 2015 game).
Divinity: Original Sin - A Linux Port. Divinity: Original Sin 2 - No Linux port.

That's an interesting observation really.
Kinda sad we lose the support throughout a series.

Divinity OS 2 is a special case. Larian promised Linux support for DOS1 a bit lightly. They had serious problems with it and were flamed for the delay, then eventually built Linux support into the enhanced engine, which was used as a basis for DOS2 also. Larian just did not promise anything anymore, except considering Linux support after the game is ready. So the game still might come for Linux...
gurv Jul 3, 2017
That would be an odd reason to cancel a port.
Having to deal with awful customers is quite unfortunately part of most businesses.

I think it's way more likely that CDPR isn't interested in Linux anymore, now that the prospect of steam machines taking a big chunk of the market is gone.
Typical short-sightedness of a shareholder owned company: don't want to invest now into Linux and will have to pay the MS Store tax down the road.

That's why I only buy on Steam. It's not the perfect store, but it's our best bet for Linux gaming to really take off.
No other company really invest/support Linux gaming (aside from porters, especially Feral).
Nezchan Jul 3, 2017
Quoting: AlveKattJust want to put it out there for everyone pointing out that windows/console game backlash for shitty releases has been even worse: "The other guys are even worse" is not an acceptable excuse for shitty behaviour. Ever.

I agree that it doesn't excuse the shitty behaviour, and I agree that it was very shitty and in no way even close to justified. There's no defending that shit and everyone involved should be ashamed and just get into the sea.

However, I don't think most people bringing it up are trying to justify said behaviour, so much as to use it to point out the hypocricy and startling unprofessionalism of basing collective punishment of the Linux community, most of whom had nothing to do with it and many of whom spoke out against it at the time.
Guest Jul 3, 2017
Quoting: Shmerl
Quoting: webcreatureThat is not racism, it's not even OSsism, it's free market. They are not denying us a right to do anything. The product people got so angry about was fixed and works fine now. It seems CDPR just decided, to not repeat the experience..

Not exactly. CDPR started working on the Linux version, communicated multiple times that it's coming, and then cancelled it without any explanation. That was already well after the release of TW2 for Linux by the way.

See this timeline: https://www.gamingonlinux.com/wiki/The_Witcher_3_Linux_port

In the summer of 2015 they were still working on it. Some problems happened after that, and year later they already changed the tone of their messages to "we are looking into" and eventually "nothing to say about it". TW2 for Linux came out in May 2014.

So, something must have happened in between summer of 2015 and spring of 2016, that borked the project. And I doubt it could be some outrage, that happened in 2014.

Yes you're right of course! So let's say they might have decided to not contimue the experience...
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.