Support us on Patreon to keep GamingOnLinux alive. This ensures all of our main content remains free for everyone. Just good, fresh content! Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal. You can also buy games using our partner links for GOG and Humble Store.
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

Valve are easing up on what content is allowed on Steam

By - | Views: 41,762

In an interesting blog post written up today, Valve's Erik Johnson has said how Valve will be relaxing their rules for what will be acceptable on Steam.

You might have seen the discussion recently about how Valve sent word to a few developers, giving them notice that their games are going to be removed from Steam. Even we picked up on this, as it didn't really feel right.

There were people suggesting that payment processors were to blame, or outside groups like we had linked in our previous article's comments. Valve said this is not the case at all. It's also not an automated process, Johnson said they have "groups of people looking at the contents of every controversial title submitted to us".

Now, Valve will allow pretty much anything "except for things that we decide are illegal, or straight up trolling". The blog post read as a surprisingly personal insight into how Valve operate, something Valve has been starting to do a little more often lately (which is great to see).

This bit got me:

So what does this mean? It means that the Steam Store is going to contain something that you hate, and don't think should exist. Unless you don't have any opinions, that's guaranteed to happen. But you're also going to see something on the Store that you believe should be there, and some other people will hate it and want it not to exist.

Naturally, Johnson made it clear that being allowed on Steam doesn't mean Valve agree with the content themselves. However, it now means a human at Valve can no longer just send out warnings of a game being removed from Steam. The fact that they're making this step, this real progress towards being more open is a good thing for developers and for gamers.

They continue to be my favourite store and I'm personally happy they will so openly admit when they're wrong and they didn't have a good handle on the situation. Their previous rules seemed to be okay for some, not okay for others—just too vague. Let's just hope the words turn into a reality.

Additionally though, a valid complaint will be that with even less curation finding games you want to see could end up being a bigger problem, one they will need to solve. Obviously this is where the likes of us come in, to let you know about good games, but an improved way to filter the Steam store itself will help. No matter what though, someone won't be happy.

Post updated after publishing.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: SteamOS, Valve
26 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly came back to check on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. Find me on Mastodon.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
94 comments
Page: «7/10»
  Go to:

tuubi Jun 7, 2018
View PC info
  • Supporter
Quoting: nox
Quoting: tuubi
Quoting: Seegras
Quoting: tuubiI don't think fraud attempts, hate mongering and racism need a legitimate platform, and neither does extremism of any sort.

Your extremism is somebody elses mainstream. And "not giving extremism a platform" is thus nothing else but an extremist position in itself.
Extremism isn't the same as having an unpopular opinion and it should never be allowed to be mainstream. You can be a staunch supporter of anarchist ideology for example. That's perfectly fine, regardless of how you feel about their opinions, and they should be allow to argue their stance. Or you can be an extremist advocating violent protests or let's say terror attacks on state infrastructure. The latter does not deserve a platform nor should it be tolerated.

I might be misunderstanding here, but "Advocating terror attacks" would very likely end up in the "illegal" part of the blog post.
True. Just trying to give an example of extremism. And saying that we definitely should not tolerate everything. I guess this is getting off topic though.
shawnsterp Jun 7, 2018
"...finding games you want to see could end up being a bigger problem, one they will need to solve. Obviously this is where the likes of us come in..."

I've found Steam's store unusable for a couple of years now. I pretty much exclusively use this site. All the more reason to support Liam I guess. So, I suppose that in that regard things won't change. But, I do not think it is good that the store is not usable. Honestly, I just clicked on "Best Sellers" and one of the first things listed for me was Left For Dead 2. And of course, I already have it as well as half of the games I see listed in front of me. Now, I suppose instead of seeing old crap I already have, there will be NEW crap that I don't want presented to me.

I do appreciate the different perspective on this though. I saw several articles about this change, and this is the only one that shows it in a positive light. I am sceptical myself, but I do understand that other outlets tend to love to bash on Steam.
Nezchan Jun 7, 2018
Quoting: tuubi
Quoting: BeamboomSpeculative junk. Porn, shovelware, fraud attempts, hate mongering, racism, extremists political and religious agendas, and so forth.

And please note, This is content that I do not say should be BANNED - they just do not belong on the main street.
Well, some of the stuff you just mentioned is deservedly illegal in most of the civilized world, so it really should be banned. I don't think fraud attempts, hate mongering and racism need a legitimate platform, and neither does extremism of any sort. Porn (with consenting adults) and shovelware are less of a problem IMHO.

That's part of what bugs me about Steam's announcement on this. They seem to be treating the hate mongering and racism, which we already know is on Steam and will increase following this policy change, as merely a disagreement between people with differeing tastes. Which seems at best hopefully naive, but more likely an attempt by Steam to avoid criticism by taking no position at all and pretending there's no issue in the first place.

But of course, not taking a position actually is taking the position that "this is all fine by us". Even with the thinnest possible disclaimer of "we aren't saying we agree with the content".
Seegras Jun 7, 2018
Quoting: Eike
Quoting: SeegrasYour extremism is somebody elses mainstream. And "not giving extremism a platform" is thus nothing else but an extremist position in itself.

Really?
Karl Popper about the problem ( "paradox of tolerance" ):

You're talking about something completely different. "Extremism" per se just means you have in some area a position that goes far beyond what most people think even as outlying.

For instance, some people think copyright is not strong enough, others think it's way too strong, but the extremist positions in that debate are a) that copyright should last forever, whereas the other extremist position is b) that copyright should be abolished. Since my position is that copyright should not be abolished but return to pre-1841 levels, I think the idea that copyright should last after the death of the artist is already an extremist idea.


Last edited by Seegras on 7 June 2018 at 12:58 pm UTC
Mal Jun 7, 2018
  • Supporter
Finally they came to their senses. It took some time, but I knew they would arrive there eventually.
rkfg Jun 7, 2018
Quoting: monnefI don't agree with censorship and my opinion is, that only a game (or any other medium) literally exciting violence in concrete context (e.g. "kill the man A today around 12" ) should be illegal and censored/removed from distribution platform like Steam. That's the sane definition of hate speech
Ever played Hitman?
Eike Jun 7, 2018
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
Quoting: Seegras
Quoting: Eike
Quoting: SeegrasYour extremism is somebody elses mainstream. And "not giving extremism a platform" is thus nothing else but an extremist position in itself.

Really?
Karl Popper about the problem ( "paradox of tolerance" ):

You're talking about something completely different. "Extremism" per se just means you have in some area a position that goes far beyond what most people think even as outlying.

No matter if I agree with your understanding of the word, there's extremism that everybody should frown upon and that we should not call mainstream for whoever.
ljrk Jun 7, 2018
Quoting: EikeKarl Popper about the problem ( "paradox of tolerance" ):
Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.

Hooray, seeing Mr Popper cited outside of my philosophy class in school is cool!

It's important to understand that he is not saying anything about tolerating the extreme, it's about tolerating *intolerance*. Ie. accept (or at least don't reject them on this basis) even extreme positions if they aren't *intolerant*. This could be eg. "extreme capitalism" or "extreme communism" as they (per se) are not intolerant. However "extreme fascism" is intolerant, as is often enough "extreme anti-fascism".

But there are more facets to it than even this. And this is where I just cannot agree with Valve's decision, just looking away ain't good. "Leaving it to the educated adults on steam"? That's a lot of trust you put into those... "educated" "adults".
Nanobang Jun 7, 2018
View PC info
  • Supporter
Good. I'm glad Steam has grown up and grown some huevos.
Nezchan Jun 7, 2018
Quoting: NanobangGood. I'm glad Steam has grown up and grown some huevos.

...by taking the most spineless position possible that avoids actually having to actually do anything.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.