Check out our Monthly Survey Page to see what our users are running.

Valve's card game Artifact seems to be dying off and fairly quickly too

Posted by , | Views: 15,573

It will be very interesting to see what Valve have up their sleeve for this one, as their card game Artifact seems to be dying.

How does the saying go? You only get one chance to make a first impression. Well, Valve made a number of missteps with the release and so not many will come back to it. When you consider the fact that in 2018 over nine thousand games released on Steam there's a ridiculous amount of competition for everyone and Valve aren't above that.

First, take a look at this (thanks SteamDB):

Artifact went from a high point of over sixty thousand players to around only two thousand in the space of about two months. It's bleeding players, quickly, and that's quite alarming. When you adjust the chart on SteamDB to look at it over a single month of "Players every day" it's showing a sad downwards trend. Unless they do something drastic, the player-base is likely to die off completely within another three to six months.

So where did it go wrong? In my opinion, Valve's decision to initially release it with zero progression and no way to earn anything without some form of extra payment was a poor one. In my original review, I did note that it could be a "deal-breaker for some" and that likely attributed to people not coming back. Valve did add some progression and unlocking systems with the "Build Your Legend Update" but the damage was already done. By the time the update was released Artifact had already lost around fifty thousand from their players per day.

It certainly hasn't helped that the Artifact team has gone a lot quieter. Take their Twitter for example, during December they put out around thirteen tweets to keep the community going. How about January? None. It doesn't exactly inspire confidence. I think Valve could honestly learn a lot from other developers at this point, a lot of games are successful not just because the game is good, but because they're constantly messing with the community and Valve has a history of being too quiet until they do something.

The biggest problem for Artifact now is the players that remain will be dedicated players that have likely honed their skills rather nicely. Anyone jumping in now and playing online is probably going to get their arse thoroughly handed to them and likely not come back often if at all.

Truthfully, as excited as I was for it, my own feelings on it have fizzled out as well. I can't quite put my finger on why exactly, since I do like the basic gameplay of it. It certainly doesn't help that people I was going to play with have also parted ways with it. A community just didn't build around it and so if Valve wish to keep it alive, their only real option left is likely just to make it free to play. It will be interesting to see what they do.

None of that is addressing the elephant in the room, which is that Valve vastly overestimated their pull with gamers. I've said it before and I will say it again, Valve are sitting on some IP that would seriously turn heads. If they put out a Left 4 Dead 3, Portal 3 or Half-Life 3 (or all of them) this would be a very different story. Not because I'm some sort of mad fanboy or something, they're just what most of their actual fans seem to be waiting for.

You can find Artifact on Steam.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
18 Likes, Who?
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. We are currently affiliated with GOG, Humble Store and Paradox Interactive. See more information here.
About the author -
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly came back to check on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly.
See more from me
43 comments
Page: 1/5»
  Go to:

LibertyPaulM 23 January 2019 at 9:57 am UTC
It'll be FTP by the end of the quarter
Patola 23 January 2019 at 10:17 am UTC
LibertyPaulMIt'll be FTP by the end of the quarter
If that is so, that will be waaaaay too late. Maybe it is even if they do it today.
TimeFreeze 23 January 2019 at 10:17 am UTC
Wait. A Dota 2 Card Game is not what people wanted? I'm SHOCKED.

How about a title which has the Number 3 in it? No? Okay *cries in corner*
TheSyldat 23 January 2019 at 10:36 am UTC
Personnaly I bought the game but I'm waiting to see if the game will receive any extensions of cards if at all.

Because right now the card pool is fairly limited and things gets boring real quick.
ixnari 23 January 2019 at 10:40 am UTC
I wonder if the devs are surprised. They made a game with micro-transactions with an upfront 20$ cost (or whatever the price is now) and an abysmal progression system. They were bleeding massive amounts of players within days of release. Maybe emulating the ActiBlizz business model for their COD games was not the best idea.

And like TimeFreeze already mentioned: there are Valve games that people would absolutely love to see. This was not one of them.
Egonaut 23 January 2019 at 10:41 am UTC
Does not surprise me at all. No one was waiting for another card game, especially not by Valve. Of course, there was high demand in the early days, because it was a Valve game. But then the truth kicked in: it's just a card game.
Xpander 23 January 2019 at 10:51 am UTC
Well that's what you get if you sell the game and add gambling into it. Though usually people will still buy all of this crap cause "its Valve and Valve is the best you know". Seems thisone didn't even work well for Valve fans

Free to play is the only option for this to be saved i guess. I have few friends who say that they would like to try it if it was free, but not willing to pay and then pay for extra stuff.
TheSyldat 23 January 2019 at 11:05 am UTC
XpanderFree to play is the only option for this to be saved i guess. I have few friends who say that they would like to try it if it was free, but not willing to pay and then pay for extra stuff.

Even as a free to play it's not gonna stick around for long if continues to have such a low card count.

Faeria almost died out of not putting out card expansions quick enough. The harsh truth is that with CCG you need to be able to shit out a new card set at least every semester to stay relevant. And every semester that's if every set is real chunky.

To make matters worse WotC have finally made a digital version of Magic that actually works and actually is fun to play this time around. So artifact is competing against not hearthstone but against the progenitor of modern day CCG's itself ...
Tchey 23 January 2019 at 11:15 am UTC
Well, thanks the universe, there is still some niche greatness, like Argentum Age : http://www.argentumage.com/
shigutso 23 January 2019 at 11:16 am UTC
If it becomes F2P I'll definitely try. Valve is very wealthy, they can make all their games F2P with cosmetics and they will still make a lot of money.
  Go to:
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on Patreon, Liberapay or Paypal. We have no adverts, no paywalls, no timed exclusive articles. Just good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!

You need to Register and Login to comment, submit articles and more.


Or login with...

Livestreams & Videos
Community Livestreams
  • Build Up: „Hive Time“
  • Date:
See more!
Popular this week
View by Category
Contact
Latest Comments
Latest Forum Posts