We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

An interview with The Final Station developers

By - | Views: 32,408
tagline-image

Q: Can you tell us something about yourself?
A: My name is Oleg, for 10 years I have worked as a web designer, and 6 of them I tried to get into the gaming industry. This time it seems it worked.

Q: You are not creating games by yourself, what can you tell us about the team at “Do My Best, Games”?
A: “Do My Best” is just a name for me and my friend Andrey Rumak, it’s only two of us. But of course we are also working with several freelancers (sound, music, promo art).

Q: You are getting published by tinyBuild, but is having a publisher worth it?
A: I can tell, that if we didn’t get the publisher, our game would never have been finished. So yeah:)

image

Q: As I can understand, The Final Station is a hybrid of two genres, train simulator and 2D platformer. Can you tell more about it? (I will more than likely add some follow up questions based your answers)
A: Yeah, our hero moves through the world by train, and from time to time he stops at stations. So stations are a large levels (villages, towns, factories) where the hero fights with enemies, looking for supplies and survivors. And when he is in his way to the next station, he needs to control train, configure reactors and of course he has to take care of passengers (heal and feed them).

Q: So you have chosen a post-apocalyptic setting with “zombies”, aren’t you afraid that this genre is a bit crowded and you might have a hard time to differentiate yourself?
A: We’re trying to go away from the word “zombie” a little, but actually I’m ok with it, for me main thing that a game was good.

YouTube Thumbnail
YouTube videos require cookies, you must accept their cookies to view. View cookie preferences.
Accept Cookies & Show   Direct Link

Q: There is one potentially controversial question I would like to ask. Based on the trailer, all survivors seems to be white, are you going to include a more diverse cast in your game?
A: —

Q:You might know that our readers are gamers, but they are also Linux users. So they would probably like to know, what is your motivation to port your game to Linux?
A: It’s quite simple, Unity supports export for Linux and Mac, so it didn’t take much time to make it. Also the more people playing our game, the better for us:)

Q: Do you anticipate any problems that may occur during the porting process?
A: I don’t think there will be any big problems, but if they will, I will be glad of any help from Linux community. Thanks!

Q: Will you release your game with day one Linux support or will be there a some delay before the Linux version will be shipped?
A: Right now I can’t tell you, sorry, but I wish it will be day one support.

Q: In the past publishers weren’t interested in Linux ports, so how did you manage to convince tinyBuild of this idea?
A: Their last project Punch Club included the Linux and Mac ports, as well as many previous games. I believe this is a common thing to get additional part of the audience. I can’t imagine any publisher saying something like “No! Anything but Linux!”.

Q: Do you think that Steam support (Steam Machines and Desktop) has helped Linux gain more acceptance as a gaming platform?
A: I think yes, but unfortunately I'm not expert in this theme.

Q: Will The Final Station support the Steam Controller and/or other gamepads?
A: Right now we’re testing the gamepad control, so I think Steam Controller will work as well.



image Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Interview
0 Likes
About the author -
author picture
Chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken chicken*

*Translation:
If you do not get the reference, it is your fault not mine.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
35 comments
Page: «4/4
  Go to:

Mountain Man Mar 18, 2016
Quoting: Purple Library Guy
Quoting: Mountain Man
Quoting: Purple Library GuyBut in that case, you shouldn't be complaining about political correctness...
Of course I can,
Of course you can. Free speech and all, we established that. But just because someone can do something does not mean they are justified in doing it.

Quotebecause the question was asked with the sole purpose of injecting controversy into something that was otherwise completely non controversial.
"into something that was otherwise completely non controversial" . . . well, if you mean that the interviewer didn't ask any other controversial questions, I suppose that's a true statement, but so what? What would your point be? What kind of belief system sees controversy as inherently evil? Shortly ago you were defending your right to be obnoxious about attacking things you identify as "political correctness" on the basis of free speech. Even if you consider controversial speech inherently annoying or offensive (in which case you're forgetting the whole point behind freedom of speech, which is precisely to preserve controversial, political speech, seen as the important baby for whose sake the bathwater of rudeness, obscenity and so on must be grudgingly kept), your right to complain about it is identical to a controversial speaker's right to indulge in it. Trying to have it both ways is a contradiction.

For that matter, controversial is in the eye of the beholder. Many would consider categorical attacks on political correctness themselves "controversial". In which case you should be on your own case for the sin of controversy, while simultaneously defending yourself as exerciser of free speech.

If on the other hand you mean that the question's topic should not have controversy attached to it--well, no. You're wrong about that, and at a bare minimum a lot of people disagree with you in good faith and have serious reasons for doing so. Including but not limited to some of the things I pointed out before, which you have carefully ignored. Let us assume that you, too, have serious reasons for your stance, beyond just "I hate this topic and wish people would shut up about it" (although I have not seen them). If you have serious reasons for thinking things like all-white-characters are just fine, and other people have serious reasons for thinking they are problematic, then that is a situation that calls for argument, discussion, meeting of minds--not for the people who disagree with you to just stop. Which is to say, it is a controversy--it is controversial--and no amount of pretending it somehow shouldn't be will change the fact.
I guess you've never heard of manufactured controversy.
TheGZeus Mar 19, 2016
Quoting: dubigrasuIt looks like the action takes place somewhere in Russia (?) so I'm not surprised about the lack of other races characters.
This makes sense.
What doesn't make sense is that they didn't just say that. :\
TheGZeus Mar 19, 2016
Quoting: Mountain ManOf course I can, because the question was asked with the sole purpose of injecting controversy into something that was otherwise completely non controversial.
Inferrence.
TheGZeus Mar 19, 2016
Quoting: loggfreakQ: There is one potentially controversial question I would like to ask. Based on the trailer, all survivors seems to be white, are you going to include a more diverse cast in your game?

seriously though, stuff like this pisses me off, the more people keep pointing race out, the more people will "cathegorize" people based on it, subconsciously or not. the less people will mention race, the less people will be racist.

maybe the developer just lives in a country where there are not much black people, like most of Europe?
you just make the games with what you know. developers don't sit there thinking "lets make all people white", they do it subconsciously because that's what most people they know look like.

pointing shit like this out constantly will only make the problem worse.
The question was valid, as would be the answer "It takes place in an area with an all-white population".

I really wish they'd just said that...
TheGZeus Mar 19, 2016
Quoting: Mountain ManI guess you've never heard of manufactured controversy.
You're the one raging and flaming in the comments section.
The interviewer didn't mention it again.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.