Every article tag can be clicked to get a list of all articles in that category. Every article tag also has an RSS feed! You can customize an RSS feed too!
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

Valve are looking towards Flatpak functionality for Steam

By - | Views: 45,474
After a rumour circulated on Reddit about Valve using Flatpak in future for Steam, it was suggested by user "gutigen" that I reach out to Valve for an official comment. I now have an answer.

I asked a simple question: "People have been claiming that Valve is moving Steam to being a Flatpak package, would you be able to confirm if this is happening?"

The reply was this:
Pierre-Loup A. Griffais, ValveHi Liam,

Not quite; we're looking at some of the underlying technology to see if it would be a good fit to improve the Steam runtime environment interactions with the host system. If we went forward with it, we would be using some of the same kernel functionality Flatpak/bubblewrap is, and hopefully reusing some core code, but we have no plans to change the cross-platform distribution and packaging method at the core of Steam.

Quoted with permission.

To put that into simpler terms: they won't be using it for how they deliver the games directly, so you won't in future get games downloaded and installed as Flatpak packages, but how Steam itself is packaged and interacts with your Linux distribution may change in future.

So essentially, nothing is happening right now as it's still at the research stage. However, it is great to hear that they are actually looking to further improve Steam on Linux. Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Steam
11 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly came back to check on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. Find me on Mastodon.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
36 comments
Page: «2/4»
  Go to:

Nyamiou Nov 23, 2016
It could be great if they could find a solution so that the Steam Runtime doesn't break on bleeding edge distributions. Also at some point they'll need to find a way to provide multiple version of the runtime, so that newer games can leverage new features that weren't available a few years ago.
ertuqueque Nov 23, 2016
As far as I know, Flatpak is more distribution agnostic than Snappy, Snappy has some Ubuntu-ish stuff that some people (developers) are not very comfortable with when packaging for other distros... At least that's what I've read.
lucinos Nov 23, 2016
A comparison to other solutions

(biased towards appimage obviously, but still a usefull link)

https://github.com/probonopd/AppImageKit/wiki/Similar-projects
minj Nov 23, 2016
Correct me if I am wrong but this feels like an end of Steam on Arch/Manjaro? We are constantly plagued by obsolete libs in steam runtime. What happens if we remove them? Will Steam 'fail over' and re-download itself immediately?
tumocs Nov 23, 2016
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
Quoting: minjCorrect me if I am wrong but this feels like an end of Steam on Arch/Manjaro? We are constantly plagued by obsolete libs in steam runtime. What happens if we remove them? Will Steam 'fail over' and re-download itself immediately?

It's already possible to run steam without runtime and arch even has the important compatibility libraries packed in repository. I wouldn't expect that to change just because they change the way to package the runtime.
lucifertdark Nov 23, 2016
I made the mistake of adding Snappy to my system a while back, it took me two days of fighting to get rid of it, every time I removed it a stray piece would cause the whole thing to reinstall, it's worse than a bloody virus & I want no part of it again thanks. If Flatpak is anywhere near as bad as that they can keep it off my system.
Luke_Nukem Nov 23, 2016
Quoting: mehari95Does anyone know why they chose Flatpak over Snap?

Because it's the more generic version of this tech. Snaps are too specialised to Ubuntu and many distros won't use them.
Luke_Nukem Nov 23, 2016
Quoting: lucifertdarkI made the mistake of adding Snappy to my system a while back, it took me two days of fighting to get rid of it, every time I removed it a stray piece would cause the whole thing to reinstall, it's worse than a bloody virus & I want no part of it again thanks. If Flatpak is anywhere near as bad as that they can keep it off my system.

FlatPak is a hell of a lot better, very self contained with few external deps.
seb24 Nov 23, 2016
Quoting: LukeNukemFlatPak is a hell of a lot better, very self contained with few external deps.
Snappy is also self contained and with no external dependencies as it's just a single package.
autonomouse Nov 23, 2016
Quoting: ertuquequeAs far as I know, Flatpak is more distribution agnostic than Snappy, Snappy has some Ubuntu-ish stuff that some people (developers) are not very comfortable with when packaging for other distros... At least that's what I've read.

As far as I'm aware, the only Ubuntu-ish thing about snappy is that it asks contributors to sign the Canonical contributor licence agreement which gives Canonical "permission to use your contributions". It goes on to say that "in effect, you’re giving [them] a licence, but you still own the copyright — so you retain the right to modify your code and use it in other projects".

Don't see the problem myself. But Flatpak is a RedHat thing, and RedHat don't like Canonical, so a lot of RedHat people are negative about anything that comes from Canonical. I guess that's what's going on wrt to some people not being very comfortable with it. Still, I assume Valve know what they're doing, so maybe Flatpak is more suitable for their needs? Then again, maybe its only one guy at Valve and that's his personal preference. Who knows?

I've not played with Flatpak yet, only snappy. Snapcraft is great though. It's really simple compared to building a deb package.


Last edited by autonomouse on 23 November 2016 at 9:49 am UTC
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.