Don't want to see articles from a certain category? When logged in, go to your User Settings and adjust your feed in the Content Preferences section where you can block tags!
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

You might want to grab a big bucket of popcorn for this one, as the big fight is about to begin. Nintendo and The Pokémon Company have formally gone after Palworld maker Pocketpair.

Interestingly, this is specifically about alleged patent infringement. It's not exactly surprising though, considering Nintendo and The Pokémon Company announced back in January they were currently investigating Palworld. Obviously they felt there was enough to go through with a legal battle.

From the press release:

Nintendo Co., Ltd. (HQ: Kyoto, Minami-ku, Japan; Representative Director and President: Shuntaro Furukawa, “Nintendo” hereafter), together with The Pokémon Company, filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the Tokyo District Court against Pocketpair, Inc. (HQ: 2-10-2 Higashigotanda, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, “Defendant” hereafter) on September 18, 2024.

This lawsuit seeks an injunction against infringement and compensation for damages on the grounds that Palworld, a game developed and released by the Defendant, infringes multiple patent rights.

Nintendo will continue to take necessary actions against any infringement of its intellectual property rights including the Nintendo brand itself, to protect the intellectual properties it has worked hard to establish over the years.

Business lawyer Richard Hoeg posting on X / Twitter brings up a good point here:

Probably going to need more specifics before I can comment more completely, but Palworld is such a different type of game from Pokémon, it’s hard to imagine what patents (*not* copyrights) might have been even plausibly infringed. Initial gut reaction is Nintendo may be reaching.

What actual patents could Palworld have infringed on? Palworld may have similarities, but as a whole it is a vastly different game to anything Pokémon that has been released so far. Plus, there's been a great many other creature collecting games released before Palworld, and lots of games that also have similar game mechanics to other parts of Palworld so this lawsuit could have a knock-on effect elsewhere if Nintendo win.

Palworld is rated Steam Deck Playable by Valve and Gold on ProtonDB.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
20 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly came back to check on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly.
See more from me
38 comments
Page: «3/4»
  Go to:

Pengling Sep 19
View PC info
  • Supporter
Quoting: Doktor-MandrakeOr Nintendos D-pad
To be fair, that was a novel invention that nobody had done before, and a correct use of patents, though. (Pretty sure that the Namco one was pre-dated by the 1987 Invade-a-Load tape-loader for the Commodore 64, though.)

On the other hand, it's being speculated that Nintendo is going after Palworld on patent grounds due to holding patents on the concept of catching monsters in a ball - something that was inspired by real-world gachapon toys that existed before the Pokemon games did. It just goes to show how little they have going for them in this case if that's all they could come up with, so hopefully they'll lose this one and won't be able to enact chilling effects on future competition.
ToddL Sep 19
Nothing shocking anymore when it comes to Nintendo and their usual lawsuit happy ways. First, they were going the copyright route because their fans were trying to tell them that Palworld copied the character designs of Pokemon and nothing came out of it. Now, they're going the patent route because of a certain game mechanic that's been used by different games over the years but yet they target Palworld over it. If that fails, then where would Nintendo target next from Palworld?


Last edited by ToddL on 19 September 2024 at 2:14 pm UTC
neolith Sep 19
Quoting: Pengling[...] It just goes to show how little they have going for them in this case if that's all they could come up with, so hopefully they'll lose this one and won't be able to enact chilling effects on future competition.
They'll also have a really hard time enforcing such patents, as software and gameplay mechanics are not universally patentable over the world.
Love their games, but, the way Nintendo is with litigation, I'm just not rooting for them by default.
Leahi84 Sep 19
This is so ridiculous. I hope they can beat Nintendo in court. Nintendo is a freaking bully and hates their customers. Long history of hostile action over even things like fanart. I've refused to give this company money.


Last edited by Leahi84 on 19 September 2024 at 3:56 pm UTC
tfk Sep 19
Ah the Mario Maffia is at it again.
Linux_Rocks Sep 19
WMan22 Sep 19
Cyba.Cowboy Sep 20
Quoting: doragasuWeird they go for patent infringement and not for copyright infringement

They appear to be using Poké Ball-like items in the trailer for Palworld on Steam... Maybe it's something to do with this?


Quoting: ShadowXeldronAlso, the new Pokemon games are crap. I need to say this every single time whenever someone brings the series up, but the Switch games are pretty dire (except maybe Legends Arceus... which is really just average)

I beg to differ - I think Pokémon Legends: Arceus is amazing... The "main" Pokémon games, whilst not bad, have been pretty "meh" for a long time now though; same s*%t with slightly-tweaked Pokémon.


Quoting: PenglingOn the other hand, it's being speculated that Nintendo is going after Palworld on patent grounds due to holding patents on the concept of catching monsters in a ball

Quoting: GuestI'm guessing one of the issues is about Patent Publication No. 20240278129(the mechanic of throwing the Poke-ball in third person, in Legends Arceus)

Ah-ha! Exactly as I thought...


Quoting: Penglingsomething that was inspired by real-world gachapon toys that existed before the Pokemon games did.

Well this is interesting... I didn't know this!
wytrabbit Sep 20
View PC info
  • Mega Supporter
Quoting: Cyba.Cowboy
Quoting: doragasuWeird they go for patent infringement and not for copyright infringement

They appear to be using Poké Ball-like items in the trailer for Palworld on Steam... Maybe it's something to do with this?

Quoting: PenglingOn the other hand, it's being speculated that Nintendo is going after Palworld on patent grounds due to holding patents on the concept of catching monsters in a ball

Quoting: GuestI'm guessing one of the issues is about Patent Publication No. 20240278129(the mechanic of throwing the Poke-ball in third person, in Legends Arceus)

Ah-ha! Exactly as I thought...


Quoting: Penglingsomething that was inspired by real-world gachapon toys that existed before the Pokemon games did.

Well this is interesting... I didn't know this!

Let me also introduce you to Robotrek:

QuoteRobotrek (1994) was another early title similar to Pokémon. It was a predecessor to the core gameplay of Pokémon in that the protagonist does not himself fight, but instead sends out robots, which are kept in capsules outside of battle.[6] There was a resemblance in functionality between these capsules and the Poké Balls used in Pokémon.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monster-taming_game#History

So the patent is for monsters being caught in balls? How is that worthy of being a patent?
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register


Or login with...
Sign in with Steam Sign in with Google
Social logins require cookies to stay logged in.