Support us on Patreon to keep GamingOnLinux alive. This ensures all of our main content remains free for everyone. Just good, fresh content! Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal. You can also buy games using our partner links for GOG and Humble Store.
We use affiliate links to earn us some pennies. Learn more.

EA (Electronic Arts) have announced that EA anticheat is going through a rebrand and refresh, and will now be called EA Javelin Anticheat. Note: you can check out anti-cheat compatibility on our dedicated page.

There's no good news for Linux platforms like Steam Deck with SteamOS here, since they're still intentionally blocking Linux platforms with any game that will have EA Javelin Anticheat.

Currently the anti-cheat is in use across series including EA SPORTS FC, EA SPORTS Madden NFL, Battlefield, F1, EA SPORTS WRC and Plants vs. Zombies. While they also publish Apex Legends, that's still currently using Easy Anti-Cheat, but that was updated to block Linux platforms too.

EA say their anti-cheat "has prevented cheating attempts while maintaining an accuracy rate of over 99%". In a recent progress report they noted some highlights:

  • EA Javelin Anticheat has blocked over 33 million cheat attempts across 2.2 billion PC gaming sessions since launch.
  • Now active in 14 EA titles, including Battlefield, Madden, and EA SPORTS FC franchises.
  • Built by experts in security, data, and game development to detect and stop cheating in all its forms.
  • Fair play is up—cheater presence in Battlefield 2042 matches was cut in half after recent updates.

You can expect all new EA published multiplayer titles to use EA Javelin Anticheat and continue to be blocked on Linux / Steam Deck. At least until the market expands enough that EA can no longer just ignore it, but for that we need Valve to release SteamOS for more devices as they said they will, and for more hardware to begin shipping with SteamOS.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
8 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. You can also follow my personal adventures on Bluesky.
See more from me
You can also find comments for this article on social media: Mastodon
All posts need to follow our rules. For users logged in: please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Guest readers can email us for any issues.
7 comments Subscribe

Tharvas 9 hours ago
It's quite easy:
If they don't want to do business with Linux Users, I don't want to do business with them.
Aron 8 hours ago
  • Supporter
Would be interesting how many of this "33 million cheat attempt" was real ones or just incompatible hardware, outdated software or linux users trying to play. I work as a software developer and know that numbers should be looked carefully if you do not have any way to verify them.
Slayer5934 6 hours ago
Would be interesting how many of this "33 million cheat attempt" was real ones or just incompatible hardware, outdated software or linux users trying to play. I work as a software developer and know that numbers should be looked carefully if you do not have any way to verify them.

Number look good? Publish number :D
dpanter 6 hours ago
  • Mega Supporter
We would also need to know how many cheat attempts were successful. 33 billion perhaps?
We can make up numbers too, EA.
Kimyrielle 4 hours ago
has prevented cheating attempts while maintaining an accuracy rate of over 99%

An accuracy rate of ~99% is pretty bad when dealing with millions of users...
Purple Library Guy 3 hours ago
Especially if cheaters are a relatively small minority of users. Like I mean, this is probably way low compared to reality, but imagine you have 1% of users are cheaters, and the anticheat thing has an accuracy rate of 99%, then I think that means about half of the people it nabs will not be cheaters . . .

Meanwhile, I find it odd that they called this thing "Javelin". Like, it's the wrong metaphor. Javelins are attacking, piercing things, whereas anti-cheat is supposedly a defensive, shielding type of thing. If they called it "Pavise anti-cheat" or "Crenelation anti-cheat" I'd understand.
scaine 2 hours ago
  • Contributing Editor
  • Mega Supporter
An accuracy rate of ~99% is pretty bad when dealing with millions of users...

Yup. Sounds like they inconvenienced 330K gamers with false positive bans.

And the hidden headline for me is that Javelin might have a 99% accuracy rating once it's found a cheat, but identifying 33 million cheat sessions out of 2.2 billion suggests that the entire cheating problem only affects just over 1.5% of those sessions!

Dunno about anyone else, but I feel like Javelin is missing some serious action.

Es really is just shit.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register



Buy Games
Buy games with our affiliate / partner links: