Patreon Logo Support us on Patreon to keep GamingOnLinux alive. This ensures all of our main content remains free for everyone. Just good, fresh content! Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal Logo PayPal. You can also buy games using our partner links for GOG and Humble Store.
We use affiliate links to earn us some pennies. Learn more.

The case of Valve versus Leigh Rothschild and all associated companies has come to an end, with Valve coming out the clear winner in this one.

For those unfamiliar, Rothschild has a lot of patents and has a habit of going after various companies to try and get money out of them. They even tried to sue GNOME, as just one appropriate example here.

It sure took a while for this situation to be solved, with a first case being originally filed in 2022 from Display Technologies LLC (a patent holding company from Rothschild). The patent in question, US8856221B2, covers a "System and method for storing broadcast content in a cloud-based computing environment". This caused Valve to file their own suit in 2023 which targeted Rothschild directly, various companies and even their lawyers.

For once, a patent troll got what was coming to them and the public verdict is an interesting one to read through. Not only has it been thrown out, but Valve have been awarded damages at what appears to be over $150,000. With the jury noting Rothschild violated the Washington Patent Troll Prevention and Consumer Protection Acts due to making the assertion of patent infringement in bad faith.

Pocket change when it comes to Valve, but perhaps a nice warning call to patent trolls not to mess with the likes of Valve.

The jury also awarded an "advisory verdict for Valve" according to the docs favouring the invalidity of Claim 7 of the ’221 Patent "due to obviousness". It's not entirely over just yet though as courts now need to set a date for the remaining disputes between Valve and Rothschild, on Valve's "invalidity and unenforceability claim".

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Misc, Steam, Valve
35 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly.
See more from me
All posts need to follow our rules. Please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Readers can also email us for any issues or concerns.
10 comments

Kivarnis 14 hours ago
HUGE W
grigi 13 hours ago
  • Supporter
What's more interesting for me here is that the patent lawyers themselves (Meyler Legal PLLC and the lawyer himself Samuel Meyler) got held responsible for filing without due diligence. This I think is the first time a PLLC has consequences for patent trolling, up to now PLLC's have been in the shadows when it comes to patent trolling.

Hopefully this will mean that lawyers will be more resistant to being complicit in patent trolling. That could change the whole landscape.

Also, wow, that verdict document is properly damning.
Mountain Man 13 hours ago
User Avatar
$150,000 seems too small of a penalty. They should have added another zero.
Ehvis 12 hours ago
User Avatar
  • Supporter Plus
Quoting: Mountain Man$150,000 seems too small of a penalty. They should have added another zero.
As far as I understood (which is very limited), this is just this step and this actually sets Valve up further action. So I'd expect much more in the future.

Not the smartest move to try and screw over a company that actually has the resources to fight back.
CatKiller 12 hours ago
User Avatar
Of note with this case is that Valve had already bought a licence for the patents. Then they got sued. So there was a case where they said, "actually, we already paid for this." Then they got sued again, so they took the gloves off.
Kimyrielle 10 hours ago
User Avatar
Quoting: Mountain Man$150,000 seems too small of a penalty. They should have added another zero.
Even that isn't enough. Businesses like that have no right to exist. They should have seized the entire thing and shut them down.
M@GOid 8 hours ago
Valve have big pockets and can afford to drag this in courts for years. But there are patent trolls going after the small companies and try to defeat them only trough legal costs.
eggrole 3 hours ago
User Avatar
Quoting: Kimyrielle
Quoting: Mountain Man$150,000 seems too small of a penalty. They should have added another zero.
Even that isn't enough. Businesses like that have no right to exist. They should have seized the entire thing and shut them down.
I'm really torn over this. On one hand I'm pretty pro-capitalism (with the understanding that all -isms need some guardrails) but I'm also very much against owning "ideas". Maybe there could be some kind of middle ground where you can sue for patent infringment if you are actively using the patent in a product. But, if you aren't using it then you lose you ability to sue for infringment. Heck maybe even move the patent to the now producer of said patented product.

Still, it all is so tiresome trying to figure out a million laws/ways to stop everyone from screwing each other over. Why, oh why, did so many of us allow money worship to be such a central focus... :(
Purple Library Guy 2 hours ago
Quoting: eggrole
Quoting: Kimyrielle
Quoting: Mountain Man$150,000 seems too small of a penalty. They should have added another zero.
Even that isn't enough. Businesses like that have no right to exist. They should have seized the entire thing and shut them down.
I'm really torn over this. On one hand I'm pretty pro-capitalism

Quoting: eggroleWhy, oh why, did so many of us allow money worship to be such a central focus... :(
Um, capitalism. That's kind of the point.
Purple Library Guy 2 hours ago
Quoting: M@GOidValve have big pockets and can afford to drag this in courts for years. But there are patent trolls going after the small companies and try to defeat them only trough legal costs.
I think that the legal system should be basically all public defenders/prosecutors. If you want to sue someone, you file the lawsuit, you get assigned a lawyer, the person you sue gets assigned a lawyer, they go at it, you both get assessed a fee based on ability to pay. If it's a complex case, maybe more lawyers, but you both get assigned the same amount of legal team. Maybe there's a step in there for a quick determination if the case is obviously frivolous it just gets dumped before the government has to spend money on you.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon Logo Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal Logo PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register