Patreon Logo Support us on Patreon to keep GamingOnLinux alive. This ensures all of our main content remains free for everyone. Just good, fresh content! Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal Logo PayPal. You can also buy games using our partner links for GOG and Humble Store.
We use affiliate links to earn us some pennies. Learn more.

California law to require operating systems to check your age

By -
Last updated: 2 Mar 2026 at 12:12 pm UTC

The time of age assurance is upon us, and not just for social media - for operating systems too and that includes Linux as well of course.

News currently doing the rounds is California law AB-1043 "Age verification signals: software applications and online services" that comes into effect January 1, 2027 that will require operating systems and app stores to get your age and be able to somehow signal that age to applications when they request it.

From the bill:

This bill, beginning January 1, 2027, would require, among other things related to age verification with respect to software applications, an operating system provider, as defined, to provide an accessible interface at account setup that requires an account holder, as defined, to indicate the birth date, age, or both, of the user of that device for the purpose of providing a signal regarding the user’s age bracket to applications available in a covered application store and to provide a developer, as defined, who has requested a signal with respect to a particular user with a digital signal via a reasonably consistent real-time application programming interface regarding whether a user is in any of several age brackets, as prescribed. The bill would require a developer to request a signal with respect to a particular user from an operating system provider or a covered application store when the application is downloaded and launched.

This bill would prohibit an operating system provider or a covered application store from using data collected from a third party in an anticompetitive manner, as specified.

This bill would punish noncompliance with a civil penalty to be enforced by the Attorney General, as prescribed.

This bill would declare its provisions to be severable.

Reading through the bill details, it doesn't seem to demand any ID scanning or anything like that. The text makes it pretty clear they want "nonpersonally identifiable data" taken from your birth date to have you placed into age brackets like under 13, under 16 or at least 18.

This is very US / California specific of course but still applies worldwide to any operating system that has downloads available in California, and continues the trend we've seen elsewhere against social media platforms from various countries (like the unpopular changes with Discord). All in the name of protecting children. This in a way seems a lot more invasive though, considering this age checking is now making its way into your PC directly. It starts with asking for your birth date, but how long before they want more - and for other places to create similar laws? It's a slippery slope.

What we may end up seeing is the likes of GNOME, KDE Plasma and other deskop environments just add in a simple date picker for your age on account creation, or some kind of statement on their downloads page on how it's not to be used in California perhaps.

It would be interesting to see how this type of law could go after Linux distributions if they don't have any age checking at all in place, especially since accounts already created before July 2027 will need to have something in place so you can go back and add your age.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Misc
18 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly.
See more from me
All posts need to follow our rules. Please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Readers can also email us for any issues or concerns.
42 comments
Page: 3/3
  Go to:

Purple Library Guy 2 hours ago
In the big picture this contributes to stuff that may well work out to being some kind of slippery slope. In the specific case, and indeed most specific cases in this sort of domain, none of the politicians care if it works or ever will work. They just care that nobody can claim they voted against protecting children; whether the measure would actually do that, or have any effect whatsoever, is irrelevant--the only thing that matters is how their political opponents could frame it.
Mountain Man 2 hours ago
User Avatar
Leave it to California to come up with some of the worst ideas.

And to everyone saying, "This isn't so bad, I can accept this," remember, this legislation is not the end, it is the beginning!

To quote Benjamin Franklin: Those who would exchange essential liberties for a little temporary safety will have neither liberty nor safety.

Last edited by Mountain Man on 2 Mar 2026 at 10:18 pm UTC
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon Logo Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal Logo PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register