We've already covered how California has a new operating system age-checking law coming into force next year - but many more US states also have plans or have them already approved. And I also recently wrote about Ubuntu and Fedora developers commenting on it, with that article briefly pointing out there's also a similar law planned for Colorado - but the situation gets a lot worse the more you look into it.
As highlighted by System76's founder Carl Richell, New York are also planning their own version that will "require all manufacturers of Internet-enabled devices, operating systems, or application stores to conduct commercially reasonable and technically feasible age assurance for users at the point of device activation" as the bill states.
In a blog post Richell notes that the New York version as far worse since it "explicitly forbids self-reporting and leaves the allowed methods to regulations written by the Attorney General" and so developers of operating systems and devices would have to have more than just your date of birth to put you into some age bracket like the California law seems to allow.
Richell ends the blog post with a key point: "The challenges we face are neither technical nor legal. The only solution is to educate our children about life with digital abundance. Throwing them into the deep end when they’re 16 or 18 is too late. It’s a wonderful and weird world. Yes, there are dark corners. There always will be. We have to teach our children what to do when they encounter them and we have to trust them."
But wait, it gets worse still. Looking around, there's also these similar laws:
- Louisiana HB 570 - Effective July 1, 2026.
- Illinois SB 3977 - Effective January 1, 2027.
- Texas SB 2420 (although this appears to be specific to mobiles).
- Utah SB 142 - some bits are already in force, other parts activate in May and then December.
There's probably others I'm not aware of, and likely more coming from other states. And there's no doubt in my mind that other countries will be taking note.
Microsoft have been locking down signing into Windows without an account for a while, and this will for sure make it easier for Windows to do such checks - but for all the various many different Linux distributions, this could become really problematic.
So not only are we all dealing with the difference age laws expanding across the world that force us to give over some form of ID or face scans to access certain services, eventually it seems we'll been doing similar just to access your own computer in your own home.
Quoting: GoEsrThey're basically inventing a "pirate" industry where open-source software will have to implement these measures, then the community will create patches (cracks) to remove them. 😆Ah, but you've touched on a good point actually. With open source - nothing stops people taking a distro and doing a spin with a patch to remove it all huh? How will they deal with anything like that...
Quoting: Liam DaweAh, but you've touched on a good point actually. With open source - nothing stops people taking a distro and doing a spin with a patch to remove it all huh? How will they deal with anything like that...By tying it to a 'must have' watering hole, so that people will want it a la Brave New World. Just look at how many swallow in-browser DRM just to pound down a few shows on streaming sites.
The impression I get is that they are going arse backwards about mandating parental controls.
Quoting: ExplosiveDiarrheaThank God US laws don't apply to the rest of the world... yet!A common thing people say - but the reality is the opposite. If you want to do any kind of business or service in the US, the laws very much do apply.
Some projects/companies will do the minimum necessary to comply where they have to but far more will just apply them universally.
Interestingly the California bill at least is meant to provide information to applications, but I haven't seen any conversation from developers on what that implementation is supposed to look like.
Last edited by GoEsr on 6 Mar 2026 at 12:28 pm UTC
Quoting: Liam DaweUnless the laws of other countries forbid doing that, and then you need to have two business models or two models of a product.Quoting: ExplosiveDiarrheaThank God US laws don't apply to the rest of the world... yet!A common thing people say - but the reality is the opposite. If you want to do any kind of business or service in the US, the laws very much do apply.
Last edited by Eocene84 on 6 Mar 2026 at 1:22 pm UTC
Quoting: Liam DaweI feel that if the things Trump is doing continue into the long term future, that I wouldn't be surprised if countries start walling themselves off from others. I could totally see the EU blocking the US, and vice versa, coming down the road, and that would include the internet, which would be split into separate ones. That would also give the governments even more control over their citizens.Quoting: ExplosiveDiarrheaThank God US laws don't apply to the rest of the world... yet!A common thing people say - but the reality is the opposite. If you want to do any kind of business or service in the US, the laws very much do apply.
On the other hand, if this could be implemented safely, maybe we could have leeway this to require service providers to stop sending ads, addictive or radicalization contents to minors.
Quoting: DarthJarjarWe might need to be very careful implementing that feature, because the OS broadcasting that the user is a minor feel like a very poor way of protecting them.Sure, because there are no bad actors among app and service providers.
On the other hand, if this could be implemented safely, maybe we could have leeway this to require service providers to stop sending ads, addictive or radicalization contents to minors.
Sarcasm: according to californian lawmakers, the best way to protect minors is to broadcast their age bracket, account name, and IP address to anyone that asks for it in an automated fashion, so everyone should know that minors are right over there and you should not target them in any way, because it is against the law.
Quoting: DarthJarjarmaybe we could have leeway this to require service providers to stop sending ads, addictive or radicalization contents to minors.I very much don't want that shit either. We should protect adults just the same, everyone is susceptible to manipulation, that is why ads are a thing in the first place.
On the bigger picture much of this seems to be standard populism in preparation for elections. The midterm is super infected this time around and with the Epstein saga being in the forefront it's worth having the election in mind when assessing these.
There also appears to be little to no confirmation that any of these could hold up in court. Anyone know of any successful cases as of yet?




How to setup OpenMW for modern Morrowind on Linux / SteamOS and Steam Deck
How to install Hollow Knight: Silksong mods on Linux, SteamOS and Steam Deck