Patreon Logo Support us on Patreon to keep GamingOnLinux alive. This ensures all of our main content remains free for everyone. Just good, fresh content! Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal Logo PayPal. You can also buy games using our partner links for GOG and Humble Store.
We use affiliate links to earn us some pennies. Learn more.

Many more US states are planning or already have operating system age verification laws

By -
Last updated: 6 Mar 2026 at 3:18 pm UTC

We've already covered how California has a new operating system age-checking law coming into force next year - but many more US states also have plans or have them already approved. And I also recently wrote about Ubuntu and Fedora developers commenting on it, with that article briefly pointing out there's also a similar law planned for Colorado - but the situation gets a lot worse the more you look into it.

As highlighted by System76's founder Carl Richell, New York are also planning their own version that will "require all manufacturers of Internet-enabled devices, operating systems, or application stores to conduct commercially reasonable and technically feasible age assurance for users at the point of device activation" as the bill states.

In a blog post Richell notes that the New York version is far worse since it "explicitly forbids self-reporting and leaves the allowed methods to regulations written by the Attorney General" and so developers of operating systems and devices would have to have more than just your date of birth to put you into some age bracket like the California law seems to allow.

Richell ends the blog post with a key point: "The challenges we face are neither technical nor legal. The only solution is to educate our children about life with digital abundance. Throwing them into the deep end when they’re 16 or 18 is too late. It’s a wonderful and weird world. Yes, there are dark corners. There always will be. We have to teach our children what to do when they encounter them and we have to trust them."

But wait, it gets worse still. Looking around, there's also these similar laws:

There's probably others I'm not aware of, and likely more coming from other states. And there's no doubt in my mind that other countries will be taking note.

Microsoft have been locking down signing into Windows without an account for a while, and this will for sure make it easier for Windows to do such checks - but for all the various many different Linux distributions, this could become really problematic.

So not only are we all dealing with the different age laws expanding across the world that force us to give over some form of ID or face scans to access certain services, eventually it seems we'll been doing similar just to access your own computer in your own home.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Editorial, Misc
7 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly.
See more from me
All posts need to follow our rules. Please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Readers can also email us for any issues or concerns.
28 comments
Page: 2/2
  Go to:

ExplosiveDiarrhea 15 hours ago
Quoting: GoEsrEU laws don't apply in the US, yet every new iPhone has a USB-C port despite Apple yelling and spitting like a Visigoth against it.
And that's because the EU smartphone market is bigger than the USA, by a couple hundreds million users actually. USB-C is also mandatory in India, which has a smartphone market about the same size of the USA, but it's expected to grow a lot in the coming years. Also China with its huge market (bigger than EU and US combined, by a lot) while not having mandatory USB-C laws, is pretty much aligned with the decision to adopt the better, common standard.
It only made sense for Apple to move away from their proprietary stuff in this case: splitting their product lines just for one tiny, in comparison, market was out of the question from an economical standpoint.
Linux_Rocks 13 hours ago
User Avatar
You had right-wing assholes calling California dumb or whatever for the age verification bullshit. But I'm sure that the redneck states doing it is either okay, not a big deal, or cause "the liberals are doing it too." Always some sorta excuse, spin, or opportunism. Seriously, fuck American bullshit period and fuck imperialism forcing it on everyone else.
ElectricPrism 13 hours ago
From what I heard, this is "compelled speech" which is illegal under the 1st ammendement of the constitution.

I could see it going up to the supreme court.

This is undoubtedly legal lawfare, they were going to impose these Totalitarian restrictions before 2030 anyways, it's just that now it serves a purpose to distract the public from "The Files", and "What's going on in the world" like Donkey Kong throwing barrels at Mario.

or, Zergling Rush strategy.

--

Also, I wanted to add, I think now more than ever with Microsoft Github projects being axed regularly, that we should push Source Distros where users maintain a offline 1:1 copy all source code for the software installed on their computers.

Popular Distros should add this functionality, and users should Popularize distros which have local user-compiling. This will add additional legal protections in some places with "compelled speech" laws.

--

Besides that, we're going to need to have access to some kind of hardware revolution similar to the NES 8086 and X86-64 where users can laser etch / print Circuit Boards and Assemble Modular silicon & common chips, even if it has a performance cost.

In W^2 2 the inexpensive modular equipment is what wins over fancy expensive stuff. A hardware revolution is going to come about one way or another as a result of this nonsense, either from the West or the East. Whichever one remains open will come out on top as developers choose the winner.

--

The only other third element I could forsee would be the creation of a Git+Torrent where source code for software is distributed via P2P instead of centralized.

--

This next few years are going to be very interesting to see. If the right plays are made Linux could stand to gain significant ground above and beyond the already billions of devices.
GoEsr 11 hours ago
User Avatar
Quoting: ExplosiveDiarrhea
Quoting: GoEsrEU laws don't apply in the US, yet every new iPhone has a USB-C port despite Apple yelling and spitting like a Visigoth against it.
And that's because the EU smartphone market is bigger than the USA, by a couple hundreds million users actually...
It only made sense for Apple to move away from their proprietary stuff in this case: splitting their product lines just for one tiny, in comparison, market was out of the question from an economical standpoint.
Apple were the ones fighting against it, as I said. The point is, per your original comment, that laws applied in important markets like the EU and the US do tend to just be applied globally because it's easier and cheaper.
Cyba.Cowboy 10 hours ago
Quoting: ExplosiveDiarrheaThank God US laws don't apply to the rest of the world... yet!
The US disagrees - just look at the Julian Assange and the Kim Dotcom sagas... Many of their alleged activities either didn't breach local legislation or sat in a so-called "grey area"; yet the "World Police" (aka American law enforcement) insisted that US laws were broken and that these individuals should be held to account.

I'm sure I and others could come up with loads of alternative examples, too.

Last edited by Cyba.Cowboy on 6 Mar 2026 at 10:43 pm UTC
EWG 2 hours ago
Ya know, I used to want to live forever. Or, at least a century or three. Now, I have changed my mind. lol.

Restore to a previous save point and try again?
ExplosiveDiarrhea 58 minutes ago
Quoting: GoEsrApple were the ones fighting against it, as I said. The point is, per your original comment, that laws applied in important markets like the EU and the US do tend to just be applied globally because it's easier and cheaper.
No, you are misunderstanding: it's not "laws tend to be applied globally". They are not, in any way. It's corporations that adopt *globally* a standard/convention required by laws in one market if it's cheaper and easier than splitting their product lines/procedures.
Please tell me how it's easier and cheaper for, let's say Ubuntu, to implement age checks in the EU if those checks are required by US laws.
And btw those checks could actually be against EU privacy laws...
GoEsr 40 minutes ago
User Avatar
How is it cheaper to implement something once instead of implement something only in specific parts of one country? 😅
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon Logo Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal Logo PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register