Did you know we have a Forum? Come and say hi!
We use affiliate links to earn us some pennies. Learn more.

Further expanded AMD HDMI 2.1 support is coming to Linux now with FRL and DSC

By -
Last updated: 12 May 2026 at 7:43 pm UTC

Good news for Linux gamers and the upcoming Steam Machine, as it appears the AMD GPU kernel drivers are expanding their HDMI 2.1 support even further.

Previously we had patches submitted to the Linux kernel to enable HDMI FRL (Fixed Rate Link) support, but these patches have been revised with version 3 now also bringing DSC (Display Stream Compression). Together, if approved and accepted into the Linux kernel, they should really help AMD HDMI support higher resolutions and refresh rates which has been quite the missing link for AMD + Linux on the open source Mesa drivers.

From the kernel mailing list:

This patch series adds HDMI FRL and FRL DSC support to the amdgpu display driver.

This work passed a representative subset of HDMI compliance and a full compliance run on this branch is in the works. We don't expect the full run to show any failures since it passes in other environments.

Thanks to Siqueira who prepared this work a couple years back and unfortunately didn't manage to send them while he was still working at AMD.

Thanks to Jerry who has been making this code solid on Linux and running the compliance tests.

The first patch in the series isn't related to HDMI 2.1 but included here because it moved the code around some key bits of the HDMI 2.1 stuff around too much. It will land with the next DC Patch series.

v3:
- Add missing DML2 bits
- Merged register headers to asdn and removed from patchset

v2:
- Add missing function pointers on DCN 3.x
- Add DSC

This will be a really great boost for Linux (and not just for gaming) if the patches get fully accepted, to see in a future Linux kernel release which would most likely be kernel 7.2 since 7.1 is already in the release candidate stage. So we might see this actually available in the second half of 2026.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
19 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. You can follow me personally on Mastodon [External Link].
See more from me
All posts need to follow our rules. Please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Readers can also email us for any issues or concerns.
5 comments

tpau 8 hours ago
It is incredible that this development still relies on files exchanged over e-mail.
Even worse is that these mailinglists are publicly archived with full names and e-mail-adresses.
Why not keep that to those that subscribed and not let harvesters access them?
Where are the gitlabs and githubs and modern infrastructure? ;)
ToddL 7 hours ago
Quoting: tpauIt is incredible that this development still relies on files exchanged over e-mail.
Even worse is that these mailinglists are publicly archived with full names and e-mail-adresses.
Why not keep that to those that subscribed and not let harvesters access them?
Where are the gitlabs and githubs and modern infrastructure? ;)
If a process has been working for this long, why change it? Besides, emails are still a good way to leave paper trails in case anyone wants to go back to see what conversations have been going on during the development process. Using modern infrastructure doesn't guarantee that every conversation will be available forever because all of it can go away if no backup (or the backup got deleted) was done to preserve it in the event the repository or other modern tools ceased to exist.
Bumadar 3 hours ago
I can't really find how they got passed thr HDMI Forum licensing?
User Avatar
Quoting: BumadarI can't really find how they got passed thr HDMI Forum licensing?
My guess: HDMI 2.2 will be the new "no license" situation. HDMI 2.1 has a data transfer rate of 4k @120Hz and some monitors already allow 4k @240Hz (which DisplayPort can handle btw). So there is a good argument for companies to implement HDMI 2.2 and pay for it (even if it is just for advertisement). I think they only want to get payed for the newest license. This way they allow older specs to be implemented, which strengthens their market position (better have it build in everywhere to be present everywhere than taking the last cents they can get).
tpau 1 hour ago
A paper trail can still be there without leaking personal data like mailadresses and full names to spammers.
I also assume that this old style approach deters people from joining eventually.

On the actual topic.
Do we have most of the HDMI 2.1 spec covered by now or is there anything else missing?
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon Logo Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal Logo PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register