AMD will be showing off their Zen CPU Architecture and letting people play with it on December 13th

One of the reasons i havent bought intel yet. I just dont want the freaking IGP. Don't like it for my Desktop. Why waste all that space? give more cores instead. Yes intel has those without IGP also but much higher priced.

Quoting: Comandante ÑoñardoI want the return of the old fashion CPUs: A pure CPU only. I don't want to pay for an integrated GPU garbage that I will not use.

Quoting: XpanderOne of the reasons i havent bought intel yet. I just dont want the freaking IGP.

Summit Ridge won't have an integrated GPU AFAIR.

Quoting: Comandante ÑoñardoI really miss the old AMD days of CPUs with hidden cores.

Do you mean unlocking those disabled cores of AMD Athlon/Phenom X3 CPUs? That's always been a bit like playing Minesweeper xD

Won't buy a new x86-CPU until they remove their microcode.

Quoting: crt0megaSummit Ridge won't have an integrated GPU AFAIR.

like i said, thatswhy i havent bought intel yet, cause most of their cpus have. only the expensive ones doesnt.
AMD FX series will not have an APU yeah.. so thats all good in my book :)


Last edited by Xpander on 8 December 2016 at 1:04 pm UTC

Quoting: crt0mega

Quoting: Comandante ÑoñardoI really miss the old AMD days of CPUs with hidden cores.

Do you mean unlocking those disabled cores of AMD Athlon/Phenom X3 CPUs? That's always been a bit like playing Minesweeper xD

Exactly that!
I have a Sempron 140 with the additional core fully functional....
and a Phenom II x2 550 with the two functional additional cores.. 4 cores for the price of 2 :)

I really miss that feature...

The FX 6300 indeed is an FX 8320 with a module that is laser cut.. ¬¬

Even when they have an iGPU, I switched from AMD to Intel because they have low power consumption and a good singlecore performance...

I would like to use AMD again if they get rid of the piledriver tech fiasco.... I want true cores with low power consumption and high IPC per core and combo is only available at Intel... for now.

Quoting: Xpanderlike i said, thatswhy i havent bought intel yet, cause most of their cpus have. only the expensive ones doesnt.
AMD FX series will not have an APU yeah.. so thats all good in my book :)

Ahh, okay. I might have been a bit under-caffeinated this morning :D

Quoting: Comandante ÑoñardoEven when they have an iGPU, I switched from AMD to Intel because they have low power consumption and a good singlecore performance...

I would like to use AMD again if they get rid of the piledriver tech fiasco.... I want true cores with low power consumption and high IPC per core and combo is only available at Intel... for now.

Yeah, that's totally understandable. I hope Zen helps to get rid of that fiasco that held me back from upgrading to anything else than a Phenom II in my main machine. I made an exception for my HTPC which got a Piledriver-based APU. At least the ones with less power-consumption are quite suitable for this niche.

Quoting: nifkerWon't buy a new x86-CPU until they remove their microcode.

Why exactly? CPUs have had microcode basically forever and you've been able to upload new revisions for a long, long time.

Quoting: crt0megaYeah, that's totally understandable. I hope Zen helps to get rid of that fiasco that held me back from upgrading to anything else than a Phenom II in my main machine. I made an exception for my HTPC which got a Piledriver-based APU. At least the ones with less power-consumption are quite suitable for this niche.

I can accept an iGPU if the integrated memory controller is 6 channel DDR4 memory; 2 for the CPU part and 4 for the GPU part... Or at least 4 channel DDR4 memory; 2 for the CPU and 2 for the GPU part..
The only APU close to those details is the PS4 APU...

Sadly, the fact that the best APU that AMD made wasn't made for PC, is the evidence that they don't care much about the desktop market.

Off topic: I would like to see motherboards with two or more sockets for the desktop market...
It will be interesting to run the system processes in one processor, the game process in the other processor and physics in other...
I think the PS4 do something like that... And I think that is the way to go for the Steam Machines... Imagine SteamOS optimized for a hardware config like PS4...

Excited to see some actual benchmarks, but I highly doubt they can compete in single core performance with those clockspeeds littered around the place. I really hope they have some higher clocked CPUs up their sleeves...

Quoting: Comandante oardoI would like to use AMD again if they get rid of the piledriver tech fiasco...

The real fiasco wasn't Piledriver. It was AMD's descision to cripple FX line in favor of AXX APU's.

After initial Piledriver flop due to lower per-core perfomance AMD got "brilliant" idea of heterogenous architecture. They thought that despite lower perfomance those GPU cores could double as auxiliary CPU cores thus "making" mighty GPU and 8-core CPU at the same time for the price of 4-core Intel CPU. They heavily gambled on this, up to not upgrading FX line to Steamroller and Excavator cores (every production line was refitted for AXX APUs).

Good idea!... Not!

This strategy had heavily relied on fancy compilers and application optimization, which simply did not come to reality. No one hurried recompiling their apps for CPU line with only 20% market share and the most popular compiler (Intel's) did everything it could to produce AMD-unsuitable code. Even now outdated FX-8320 CPU is more efficient (and cheaper) than any A12 chip. :-(