Deus Ex: Mankind Divided arrives on SteamOS & Linux on the 3rd of November

Actually you can get a great performance on D3DX12 - you just have to implement and optimize it in a proper way. Many D3DX12 games are not in a good shape though. One exampe of a nice implemention is 'Ashes of the Singularity'. The developers also wanted to bring this game to Linux. They also said it's a shame if you spent much work in developing D3DX12 without porting it to Vulkan since the syntax is so very close.

I suppose the problem with the AAA titles is that they are in development for a long time and running on engines that have been developed for even longer. Which means that all that DX12 support will be pretty much bolted on without proper engine design for some time to come. The smaller developers appear to be adapting quicker.

The framerates are only bad on Windows if you enable Contact Hardening Shadows (which is future-tech, and actually slightly broken), and/or MSAA which everyone should know tanks framerates.

Quoting: MblackwellThe framerates are only bad on Windows if you enable Contact Hardening Shadows (which is future-tech, and actually slightly broken), and/or MSAA which everyone should know tanks framerates.

Even without those settings game lags like hell. I mean, my PC can run Doom and Witcher 3 with decent graphics but DE:MD often shows less than 30 fps even on low settings. Especially in DLC location where it is raining outside.
If I have not bought this game earlier for windoz I would not buy it now. Its not only about performance, but also about uncompleted story and DLCs that are obviously taken out of the main game just to make more money.
Of course i would like to support more Linux ports but f**** square enix.


Last edited by MadVillain on 22 October 2016 at 8:38 pm UTC

QuoteNixxes, who handled the PC port of Mankind Divided, have detailed the settings you can expect to run if your rig matches the game's minimum or maximum requirements.

"At minimum spec, which is a HD 7870 2GB or GTX 660 2GB, paired with an Core i3-2100, we aim to give you an average of 30 fps, at 1280*720 resolution, but this is at the low quality preset.

"At recommended spec, which is a RX 480 4GB or GTX 970 4GB, paired with an i7-3770K, our target is to offer you 60fps average at 1080p, but at the High quality preset."

Wow. I am already amazed by the mad max port. If the required specs are equivalent, I can imagine that the game will run the almost the same as on windows which is even more incredible. Really feral is doing magic with their linux port recently. I will buy no matter how it runs to support the effort, and because it is completly deserved.

You guys talking about space left on your SSDs are aware of the fact that loading times if games on HDDs and SSDs won't differ that much most of the time? Unless the game streams a massive amount of data while you're in game there's almost no difference at all.

It's not exactly worth buying a SSD just for games. You can either search for tests or benchmark this on your own. Of course a SSD would never be slower than a HDD, but most of the time, for games, it wouldn't be noticeable faster.

Thanks Feral!!! and thanks to WBGames and SquareEnix for lets to feral do the ports

Quoting: melkemindLike many of you, I wonder why Vulkan wasn't on the table.

My guess is that Feral bases their ports on a "compatibility" layer they developed wrapping the D3D calls to OpenGL calls. That's why they have a reasonable time to market with their ports, making it worth the effort.

And this layer for DX12 -> Vulkan probably does not exist yet, or not in reasonable quality (drivers/their implementation).

Even engines which are natively supporting it (Croteam/Serious Engine) we see that Vulkan isn't yet that much of a performance boost (considering that The Talos Principle still runs worse on Vulkan than OpenGL for me).

Quoting: cRaZy-bisCuiTYou guys talking about space left on your SSDs are aware of the fact that loading times if games on HDDs and SSDs won't differ that much most of the time? Unless the game streams a massive amount of data while you're in game there's almost no difference at all.

It's not exactly worth buying a SSD just for games. You can either search for tests or benchmark this on your own. Of course a SSD would never be slower than a HDD, but most of the time, for games, it wouldn't be noticeable faster.

SSD's are just faster, period. Whether it makes a difference in one situation and not in another is not really something I am interested in. Most performance gains come from initial start times. Once applications get loaded into memory there isn't much benefit, but when a lot of data needs to be read into memory quickly it makes a large difference. My OS is on an SSD also. Reliability is a big issue for me and SSD's are much more reliable. Sometimes there are firmware issues which require an update, but the drive itself hasn't failed. Of course they will eventually, but I haven't had a single SSD fail even though I've had several hard drives fail that I bought at the same time or after I bought the SSD's.


Last edited by m2mg2 on 24 October 2016 at 12:35 pm UTC