You can sign up to get a daily email of our articles, see the Mailing List page.
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

We all know the current Linux gaming market share isn't turning heads and it can be tough to persuade developers that having a Linux version is worth it. I wanted to take the opportunity to talk about user reviews and how they can help out. The primary focus here will be steam, as it’s the largest player, but this also should apply to GOG, itch.io and other stores.

Since I follow a lot of developers and talk to developers every single day, one of the biggest problems they currently face is actually getting noticed. Unless they have some fantastic marketing skills or the backing of a decent PR firm or publisher, they're probably going to struggle in the current market given how many games are bursting onto various stores like Steam every single day.

I constantly see developers practically begging for people to review their game on Steam, because of just how important they are.

With that in mind, perhaps this is a way to get developers more invested in the Linux version of their games and the Linux community. I mentioned at the start that the current Linux market share isn't great, but let's think about how many of us actually buy games versus how many actually bother to leave a review—the answer is usually not that many. I know there's a lot of seriously passionate gamers who follow us, so why don't we think about actually getting that passion properly across to developers in ways that not only helps them directly but also helps us actually get noticed?

Developers are more likely to continue supporting Linux with future games if we are useful! Especially when the majority we speak to mention that a Linux version wasn't truly worthwhile in terms of financial reward. So with this, we give them another reason to support the platform.

If more developers suddenly saw reviews from a few hundred/thousand Linux gamers, which helps them get noticed through Steam's various algorithms for putting games in front of people, this could actually help quite a lot. I'm not just talking about how Steam shows games on the home page and in various lists, but also how it tells you how many of your friends recommended it too on the sidebar of a game's page. Think about it—you’re probably more likely to actually buy a game if you saw that multiple Linux users recommend it directly.

This can then push various games in front of a wider audience for Windows and Mac too, not just Linux, resulting in developers actually seeing more sales, overall. This, in turn, allows them to continue to support their games and work on new ones. So in a way, this actually ties into the previous article "How to be a great advocate for a niche gaming platform", about how we're not just fans of Linux but the games themselves as well and I think it's a point worth remembering.

It should go without saying, but I will do so anyway: if a game isn't any good then don't blindly go giving it a positive review. If you think issues can be solved, talk to the developer first and give feedback.

Also, just to be clear on something. I'm not saying this is going to move mountains and won't really apply to bigger developers that already get a ton of reviews. That said, it does depend on the situation. For Linux porters like Aspyr Media, Feral Interactive, Virtual Programming and so on—it would still be useful to show them that the port was worth it and continue to spread the word about their ports.

So basically, for a really short version: Think about the last few games you played and if they were good, leave a review and let the developer know you enjoyed it and played it on Linux. It helps a lot more than you might have thought.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Editorial
32 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly came back to check on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. Find me on Mastodon.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
25 comments
Page: 1/3»
  Go to:

bryanquigley Aug 9, 2018
Is there a simple way we could associate the reviews with Linux users reviewing?
#Linux #GamingOnLinux - I can see how to tag products but not reviews.
g000h Aug 9, 2018
Guilty as charged. Yes, I need to leave more reviews myself. Not only does it encourage the developers, but also it encourages Windows users to consider Linux, and it motivates other Linux users that a particular title is working well under Linux.

When I'm reading through reviews and spot the person has played on Linux, it certainly helps with my encouragement.
bubexel Aug 9, 2018
Me and some friends launch that game https://store.steampowered.com/app/692130/Rise_Of_Titans/ last week in early acces. Now we did a soft launch, only is accessible on south america, spain and easteuropean countries. When we have a solid build we will release it to all countries. If you are from those countries feel free to test it and submit a review ;D


Last edited by bubexel on 9 August 2018 at 7:44 pm UTC
cbones Aug 9, 2018
I started leaving reviews for almost all games I play now for precisely this reason. Though, do be prepared for some trolls in the toxic Windows community to leave annoying comments - I still am not sure if the best course of action is to delete those comments (which I have been doing) or to leave them there as evidence of their toxicity.

That being said, I use a modified format from Steam user headless_cyborg. I write a short paragraph about my thoughts, and add in some details in the table, here is my modified template:

[h1]System Info & Performance Report[/h1]
[table]
   [tr]
        [td]Operating System[/td]
        [td]Ubuntu Linux 16.04 x64[/td]
    [/tr]
    [tr]
        [td]CPU[/td]
        [td]Ryzen 5 1500x[/td]
    [/tr]
    [tr]
        [td]GPU[/td]
        [td]GTX 1050, nvidia-396.51[/td]
    [/tr]
    [tr]
        [td]Game Saves[/td]
        [td]Automatically and manually with 4 total save slots[/td]
    [/tr]
    [tr]
        [td]Notes[/td]
        [td]The stories are a great way to tie everything together and add some replayability[/td]
    [/tr]
    [tr]
        [td]Technical Notes[/td]
        [td]<Poor performance in xyz area> | <No Problems>[/td]
    [/tr]
[/table]



Last edited by cbones on 9 August 2018 at 8:26 pm UTC
scaine Aug 9, 2018
View PC info
  • Contributing Editor
  • Mega Supporter
I understand your frustration, nPHYN1T3, but with 107K reviews already logged for Arma 3, this article isn't aimed at them. They just don't need us as a market and actually I quite like the fact that they're experimenting with supporting us anyway. I paid full price for Arma 3 as a token of support to BI's "risk" and I'm frustrated as you that while the single-player experience seems okay, a lot of the rest is a broken mess, mainly due to their release schedule.

But as I say, this isn't about BI or their ilk. Some targeted reviews on smaller studios could really make a difference in showing developers that we're more than the 0.5% Steam survey makes out.
rkfg Aug 9, 2018
I want to add that it's not enough to just leave a review. It must be at least mildly interesting, informative and not short. I often see useless reviews like "good game, must buy" or some not so funny jokes (instead of a review) that still get many thumbs up. Don't be those guys, please. When I write a review I always ask myself: what would I like to know about this game that will make me buy it? Something not mentioned on the store page, something unique about this exact game. Why should I spend my hard earned money on this title and not on something else?

Sometimes the developer's description is too vague and uninformative. Sometimes to the extent that even watching the gameplay videos doesn't help. But you know that the game is a gem (or at least cool enough), it's just that the developer failed to describe it properly or highlight the unique mechanics the game has. Fix it! Write a review that makes the game look right. You don't need any particular writing skills for that, don't be scared. Just tell people what you liked in this game or something unusual you noticed.

I often write a review if I spent more than 10 hours in the game, that means I've been hooked so the title is worth it. And I help other people get hooked as well. Most of my Steam friends use Windows and that proves that Linux players are important for everyone if they help both developers and players, even on different platforms.


Last edited by rkfg on 9 August 2018 at 9:27 pm UTC
Shmerl Aug 9, 2018
Do you mean to leave reviews for Linux releases, or to leave them for Windows only releases and comment about interest in Linux versions? I suppose for the later case you assume playing it in Wine?

Convincing developers who aren't yet releasing for Linux can be tricky.


Last edited by Shmerl on 9 August 2018 at 8:52 pm UTC
scaine Aug 9, 2018
View PC info
  • Contributing Editor
  • Mega Supporter
Quoting: ShmerlDo you mean to leave reviews for Linux releases, or to leave them for Windows only releases and comment about interest in Linux versions? I suppose for the later case you assume playing it in Wine?

Convincing developers who aren't yet releasing for Linux can be tricky.

I only read this as giving developers already supporting Linux a reason to be delighted with us Linux users, by leaving reviews of their Linux games. This in turn ensures some developer loyalty and shows other non-Linux-supporting-developers the error of their ways...
Shmerl Aug 9, 2018
Yes, good point. Leaving reviews and thanking for the Linux release will give them more appreciation of the Linux user base.
Alm888 Aug 9, 2018
Quoting: ShmerlDo you mean to leave reviews for Linux releases, or to leave them for Windows only releases and comment about interest in Linux versions?

IMO, a review should be just that: a review. This means one must at least play the game in order to judge it and vocalize its flaws/strengths. Otherwise it will be like "I haven't read <author's name, usually Pasternak>, but I condemn him/her!"

That being said, if one played a game in WINE, I see no problems with him/her leaving a review and marking it as "WINE experience" because, obviously, those playing the game on Windows might have different results, and this review helps other WINE-users to better weight the purchase (not that I encourage WINE-targeted purchases, it is NTNB for me most of the time, but that's just me).
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.