While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:
Reward Tiers:
Patreon. Plain Donations:
PayPal.
This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!
You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Reward Tiers:
This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!
You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register
- Linux and open source getting age checking exemptions could be problematic
- Steam Deck stock returns but there's a big price increase
- Proton-CachyOS adds low latency layer and Discord rich presence support
- Linux Mint gets file manager improvements, a new screenshot tool and more
- Unreal Engine 6 revealed with a major Rocket League upgrade - the teaser concerns me
- > See more over 30 days here
- Are Mac computers good and stable?
- PlayingOnLinuxphone - Terminal trick - progress indicator in the task manager…
- Shmerl - Feedback needed - future website updates
- grigi - What have you been playing recently? - 17th May edition…
- PlayingOnLinuxphone - Anti-Cheat page updates
- Liam Squires-Hand - See more posts
Anticheat check - which competitive games actually work on Linux?
How to give Valve feedback when Proton games have issues on Linux / SteamOS
I'd like to donate and not see the ads but I don't want to use patreon. Can you do something like what phoronix does and have yearly/life one-time paypal purchases? I'm not sure how much money they bring in, but I got the lifetime membership with them, so they got my money that way :)
Love your site, thank you!
They decided to make temporary paywalls, and it works for them. The basic principle is: The majority of articles are payment-free, with no charges. But some more extensive/detailed articles temporarily sit behind a paywall for one week. After the week has passed, anyone - subscriber or not - is free to access it. In addition, paying subscribers have the option to create a payment-free link for their friends (e.g, The subscriber can make a link, which allows access to the article without payment).
Many of their readers (myself included) decided to subscribe to help them. If you provide quality content and do it fairly, people will pay. Particularly in the FOSS community where most of them outright despise data collecting ads and/or block them entirely by default, which in turn would mean lost revenue for yourself from those users.
You can see more on how they do it here:
https://lwn.net/op/FAQ.lwn#subs
It may feel "bad" to charge for content but, ultimately you have to remember you have your own expenses and you are providing a service to others, as such it is not unreasonable to ask for payment for your services.
Another thing I might add: Cost cutting, do you really need a single server that costs £500/mo? That's a lot! I bet you can find an equivalent server to what you're running for less per month.
Agreed. :tongue:
Last edited by BlackBloodRum on 9 Jan 2024 at 9:51 am UTC
:grin:
And again, no plans for paywalls. Just not happening.
Last edited by GamingOnLinux Bot on 9 Jan 2024 at 11:17 am UTC
I don't mean literally everyone though, plenty of people are generous <3 (I'm sure most of you get my point)
Last edited by GamingOnLinux Bot on 9 Jan 2024 at 1:36 pm UTC
Anyway, as Liam said, you're free to use an ad blocker and he won't hold that against you.
Last edited by BlackBloodRum on 13 Jan 2024 at 8:38 pm UTC
It makes me feel like I went to one of those download sites that has 15 ads impersonating the download and maybe, just maybe there is an actual download in there somewhere; and maybe there isn't.
Last edited by m2mg2 on 13 Jan 2024 at 9:20 pm UTC
It does look pretty ridiculous. That's why I assumed it's a joke.
It looks like maybe they've been toned down a little. They don't look quite as intrusive as they did the other day. IMO, the ads should be significantly smaller than the content blocks. Blending them in with the content is basically tricking people into paying attention to them and making them bigger than the content blocks is just ridiculous. Having them smaller and to the side instead of mixing them with the content would be better.
I do find advertising to be pretty gross in general on websites. IMO the public is way too accepting of invasive advertising and data collection (as if the industry asked or cared, we really don't have a choice).
Last edited by m2mg2 on 13 Jan 2024 at 10:11 pm UTC
It doesn't look too bad though, as I'd imagine that's how most ads are. It seems typical. It's as I remember it back before I started using adblockers (12+ years probably at this point, as soon as adblock plus originally came out).
There was no pop-ups, so that's good!
[1] I know the browser still says chromium and not ungoogled chromium, that's just because it is chromium but compiled with the ungoogled patches locally rather than using the flatpak for it. :smile: