Latest Comments

Quoting: AnonymousI'm still at a loss how such a simple concept, that people running linux as their OS should be counted as running linux as their OS, would get such a reaction. Especially from 2 editors no less. Honestly, if RPS hadn't mentioned this place, I'd have never heard of it. Think there might be a reason I hadn't heard of it...

Okay, up until this point I have been reading your posts with a certain amount of good humour, but when you start insulting the website I have to draw a little line in the sand here. First, as Liam has explained, Cheese and my opinions are our own respectively, and do not necessarily reflect Liam (the owner) or anyone else on this website. Second, we have not been being abusive, we have not been attacking you, and we have not abused our powers against you. You have no reason to complain that a couple of Editors have disagreed with you.

And your RPS comment is interesting since they are also quite well known for never being of one mind on anything and allowing a great deal of editorial freedom.

Quoting: AnonymousThe word "wine" comes out, and it doesn't matter what I say, everyone kneejerks and assumes I'm saying something else, then turns around and basically says what I've said as if it should set me straight.

I hardly think I am being kneejerk against Wine here. In fact, I use Wine often, and do not actually use Steam in any incarnation (so my interest in this discussion is purely academic). It is true that I do not believe it is a proper substitute for native Linux gaming, but this is not about penalizing people for using Wine.

This is about the fact that playing a Windows executable is not the same as running a Linux executable. If you believe that Wine numbers are really inflating the Windows stats (something which I do find dubious as I doubt it is all that large a piece of them) to such a degree, why are you opposed to the suggestion of a separate entry for Wine usage?

Not that all this really matters, as we are not Valve.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

[table][tr][td][115110](http://steamdb.info/app/115110/)[/td]
[td]Game[/td]
[td]Stacking[/td]
[td]12 minutes ago[/td]
[td]Game Possibly Works (No Linux Icon) (unconfirmed)[/td]
[/tr]

[tr][td][115100](http://steamdb.info/app/115100/)[/td]
[td]Game[/td]
[td]Costume Quest[/td]
[td]12 minutes ago[/td]
[td]Game Possibly Works (No Linux Icon) (unconfirmed)[/td]
[/tr]
[color][size][font]
[/font][/size][/color][tr][td][225260](http://steamdb.info/app/225260/)[/td]
[td]Game[/td]
[td]Brütal Legend[/td]
[td]13 minutes ago[/td]
[td]Game Possibly Works (listed)[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Personally I think Wine is fantastic and is part of the reason Linux has been as popular as it has been.

I am unsure where I stand on it, I think my personal view is that I would like for Wine installs to be counted as exactly what it is - Wine.

Since Wine can be run on Mac as well it would be interesting to get the numbers on it.

QuoteHonestly, if RPS hadn't mentioned this place, I'd have never heard of it. Think there might be a reason I hadn't heard of it...

The main reason would be that we are still a small website nothing to do with our commenters as you imply - you are the only one who seems to be having a big problem with all of this.

Mr/Miss? Anonymous I've read all of this and I see nothing wrong with what my editors have said, everyone has their own point of view that is the point of commenting if they don't agree with you it's not them being confrontational it's them trying to give their point of view as well.

Honestly to me it just sounds like everyone is having a good old chat, just remember to keep it cool guys.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: AnonymousYes. I've been saying that. Repeatedly.

I think this point has been overlooked by the bigger picture, but I do agree with you here.

Quoting: AnonymousYes. Which is why it needs to report as linux rather than anything else. I've been saying that. Repeatedly.

Quoting: AnonymousYes. That would be the entire point of why I've been saying it should report as linux.

You keep saying everyone is missing your point, yet you are missing everyone else's. Wine usage should *not* count as a *native* Linux client. Plain and simple. However, it *should* count as a Windows client in an *emulated* environment.  

I think the main problem is that the title of the "OS" portion of the survey is misleading, in that it would suggest what base operating system you are running, but we are all too aware that this is not always the case.

Quoting: AnonymousWell, that's not surprising. Even you're doing a similar song and dance. The word "wine" comes out, and it doesn't matter what I say, everyone kneejerks and assumes I'm saying something else, then turns around and basically says what I've said as if it should set me straight. If it's unclear, why do you all keep restating my points?

I haven't "knee jerked" at all -- my previous point about "OS" being misleading hopefully clarifies my stance a bit better. Considering you think we are all putting words in your mouth, you sure are doing a lot of the same. If there is some kind of communication issue between your posts and mine, then I can only apologise -- as I said, to me, your stance is unclear.

Quoting: AnonymousYou seem to have understood them well enough to rephrase them and retain the meaning.

I don't know how best to respond to that -- you obviously have a good idea of where you stand on the matter, however that stance is not coming across (to me) in your posts. If my opinion on it matches yours, but the wording is different, then perhaps it's because the way your phrase it does not make it obvious. I'm not trying to argue what your opinion should be, I'm trying to get across my opinion and clarify how I interpreted other peoples opinion to maybe help you understand them better.

Quoting: AnonymousWell, I point out the basic flaw of the hardware survey in this instance and assumed everyone else was smart enough to connect the dots. I get people who don't "buy it" as if I'm a charleton selling snakeoil, then turn right around and say they don't think wine should count as windows either. I've done this till I literally can't comprehend how people are missing this, so I tried to drop it down another notch to make it harder to twist around. So yes, I've stripped everything out, because anything else just seems to fly above heads.

Being obnoxious does not prove a point.The main argument (as far as I can tell) rebutted against you was that -- because your original post did not go in to nearly as much detail as your subsequent replies -- Wine should not be counted as native.

There are clearly some crossed wires here because Wine usage still means they are running Linux, however - on the face of things - it does not accurately suggest Linux users want Linux ports. It suggests Linux users are happy to settle on Wine compatible way before an actual port (which wouldn't be so bad if the developers helped improve Wine).

Quoting: AnonymousI'm still at a loss how such a simple concept, that people running linux as their OS should be counted as running linux as their OS, would get such a reaction. Especially from 2 editors no less. Honestly, if RPS hadn't mentioned this place, I'd have never heard of it. Think there might be a reason I hadn't heard of it...

I'm not sure if you want a response from me on this or not.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: edgleyIf they attribute the Wine usage as actual Windows usage, then they should probably do something about that

Yes. I've been saying that. Repeatedly.

Quoting: edgleyHowever, many companies see Wine as a viable "Linux port"

Yes. Which is why it needs to report as linux rather than anything else. I've been saying that. Repeatedly.

Quoting: edgleyI can't speak for anyone else, of course, but I think most people would argue that a native port is better than a Wine wrapper.

Yes. That would be the entire point of why I've been saying it should report as linux.

Quoting: edgleyI don't see either Hamish's or Cheese's arguments as straw men, I see your point as being unclear.

Well, that's not surprising. Even you're doing a similar song and dance. The word "wine" comes out, and it doesn't matter what I say, everyone kneejerks and assumes I'm saying something else, then turns around and basically says what I've said as if it should set me straight. If it's unclear, why do you all keep restating my points? You seem to have understood them well enough to rephrase them and retain the meaning.

Quoting: edgleyJust to add, your example here is -- in my opinion -- stripped right down to the basics, which I don't think is close to accurate.

Well, I point out the basic flaw of the hardware survey in this instance and assumed everyone else was smart enough to connect the dots. I get people who don't "buy it" as if I'm a charleton selling snakeoil, then turn right around and say they don't think wine should count as windows either. I've done this till I literally can't comprehend how people are missing this, so I tried to drop it down another notch to make it harder to twist around. So yes, I've stripped everything out, because anything else just seems to fly above heads.

I'm still at a loss how such a simple concept, that people running linux as their OS should be counted as running linux as their OS, would get such a reaction. Especially from 2 editors no less. Honestly, if RPS hadn't mentioned this place, I'd have never heard of it. Think there might be a reason I hadn't heard of it...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: AnonymousYou're stuck on the fact that a previously released game is being run with emulation, while I'm discussing how not identifying that properly will effectively camouflage the linux market until companies no longer believe it exists. That results in less native games, more emulation, and it just snowballs from there.

This is a very simple point. I'm utterly astounded that you keep trying to twist it into something else and then complain about your version. That's called a "straw man argument" btw.

I don't know how Valve attribute Wine usage into their stats, but you have to acknowledge you want to participate in the survey -- so you would only add to the stats if you said you are okay with it.

If they attribute the Wine usage as actual Windows usage, then they should probably do something about that, however Steam itself (again, how that gets transferred I have no idea) is aware it's being run in Wine; when you get the system information through Steam it tells you the Wine version as well.

However, many companies see Wine as a viable "Linux port" -- if they see that a lot of Linux gamers are running games via Wine just fine, then this could have a negative impact on said companies opinion of making an actual native port just as much as hiding the fact that lots of Linux gamers use Wine.

I can't speak for anyone else, of course, but I think most people would argue that a native port is better than a Wine wrapper.

I don't see either Hamish's or Cheese's arguments as straw men, I see your point as being unclear.

Quoting: AnonymousGame company X is making a new game. They want to distribute on Steam as it is a very popular service. They look at the hardware survey to decide what platforms to support before beginning their project and see that no one apparently uses linux, so they won't bother supporting the platform. In reality, a large chunk of the supposed windows users are in fact using linux, and would love company X's new game to be released natively... but alas, the metrics lied to them. Thus company X does not make linux games. Company Y, wanting to model themselves on X's success, notices they don't waste time with linux, so neither will they. etc. etc.

Just to add, your example here is -- in my opinion -- stripped right down to the basics, which I don't think is close to accurate.

I would really hope that a company does not base their entire operation around Steam and Steam's (known) less than perfect survey. Moreover, I wouldn't say a "large chunk" of the Windows user base was in fact running Wine.

At best, I would estimate 1% of the entire Windows group were running Wine.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Ah, well that sums it up. You miss the point entirely, and can't even see how you've missed it when notified, because you're thinking on a different scale.

You want everything to have its nice little box to be put into. You think I'm saying that, for instance, playing Fallout:New Vegas with wine and being counted as using linux will somehow make a new vegas port appear out of thin air.

So, for the final time, I'm going to explain this. Let's try a story since outright discussion seems impossible:

Game company X is making a new game. They want to distribute on Steam as it is a very popular service. They look at the hardware survey to decide what platforms to support before beginning their project and see that no one apparently uses linux, so they won't bother supporting the platform. In reality, a large chunk of the supposed windows users are in fact using linux, and would love company X's new game to be released natively... but alas, the metrics lied to them. Thus company X does not make linux games. Company Y, wanting to model themselves on X's success, notices they don't waste time with linux, so neither will they. etc. etc.

You're stuck on the fact that a previously released game is being run with emulation, while I'm discussing how not identifying that properly will effectively camouflage the linux market until companies no longer believe it exists. That results in less native games, more emulation, and it just snowballs from there.

This is a very simple point. I'm utterly astounded that you keep trying to twist it into something else and then complain about your version. That's called a "straw man argument" btw.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: tooryea got it yesterday and I'm really not unhappy, the graphics are awesome and it's interesting to play

That's a strange way to put it :P

I didn't actually see the previous post about this, but I brought it on Desura this morning going purely off the screenshots and a very brief YouTube video I found.

Looks very promising and I will be trying this out tonight :)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

yea got it yesterday and I'm really not unhappy, the graphics are awesome and it's interesting to play

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Anonymous

Quoting: CheesenessWhilst stats of Wine users as a separate metric may be of value in some respects, I think it would undermine the efforts and recognition of people actually running native software if the numbers were to be mixed with people running software that pretended to be Windows

Yes, that is my point. Thanks. Oh wait...

Ah, no. You misunderstand. I think it would undermine the efforts and recognition of people actually running native software if the numbers of people running native software were mixed with people running software that pretended to be Windows.

Quoting: Anonymous

Quoting: Cheesenessand in the end make for less accurate data rather than more accurate as you claim.

So I say if I'm using wine, that I should count as linux. You say that wine stats should not be mixed with windows stats, which seems to be in agreement with me. Then you say I'm wrong? How does that work?

No, I'm saying that Wine user stats should not be mixed with Linux user stats, that they should be included in Windows stats, and that there would be value in having an entirely separate measurement of Wine vs native Windows users.

Quoting: Anonymous

Quoting: CheesenessIMO, championing Wine usage stats is a trap.

Which is why there shouldn't be any. It should count as linux, because that's the OS you're running. Who, besides you, ever mentioned such a thing as stats for wine?

You (or another Anonymous user) did:

Quoting: AnonymousTo save time, let me just tell you that a company questioning whether or not to port a game to linux would want to know how many potential new customers they could get for their efforts. In that respect, someone running a linux OS is what matters. The fact that a gamer is using a workaround to play something is irrelevant in the course of having accurate data to base that decision on.

Please refer to my previous post for reasons why this reasoning may be flawed (namely, that from a business perspective, if a Linux user has already bought a game, they don't represent a new market that a native version would gain sales from).

Quoting: Anonymous

Quoting: HamishWe need to show that there is a native market on Linux if they are going to be convinced to make a change.

THAT

IS

MY

POINT

Are you certain that that is your point? Hamish is saying that we need to show that there is a market of people who don't use Wine, something that would be misrepresented by the presence of Wine users in the Linux Steam stats.

Quoting: AnonymousWhy do you keep twisting it and telling me I've got everything ass backwards, then espouse the exact same thing I just said? What is wrong with both of you?

Nothing is wrong with either of us - in fact, we're being awfully patient with what is coming across as a very abrasive attitude :)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: HamishWe need to show that there is a native market on Linux if they are going to be convinced to make a change.

THAT

IS

MY

POINT

Why do you keep twisting it and telling me I've got everything ass backwards, then espouse the exact same thing I just said? What is wrong with both of you?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: CheesenessI can't really speak for Hamish, but he certainly didn't come across as confrontational or lacking insight to me.

Thank you. ^_^

And you also helped by making my point for me - I really do not see why a game company would take that much interest in Wine stats as that means people are buying and purchasing their games already. We need to show that there is a native market on Linux if they are going to be convinced to make a change.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: CheesenessWhilst stats of Wine users as a separate metric may be of value in some respects, I think it would undermine the efforts and recognition of people actually running native software if the numbers were to be mixed with people running software that pretended to be Windows

Yes, that is my point. Thanks. Oh wait...

Quoting: Cheesenessand in the end make for less accurate data rather than more accurate as you claim.

So I say if I'm using wine, that I should count as linux. You say that wine stats should not be mixed with windows stats, which seems to be in agreement with me. Then you say I'm wrong? How does that work?

Quoting: CheesenessIMO, championing Wine usage stats is a trap.

Which is why there shouldn't be any. It should count as linux, because that's the OS you're running. Who, besides you, ever mentioned such a thing as stats for wine?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: AnonymousTo save time, let me just tell you that a company questioning whether or not to port a game to linux would want to know how many potential new customers they could get for their efforts. In that respect, someone running a linux OS is what matters. The fact that a gamer is using a workaround to play something is irrelevant in the course of having accurate data to base that decision on. If linux is their os, then linux is what should be reported. Otherwise the real numbers are watered down by people using workarounds like wine, thus ultimately delaying or completely preventing linux ports because it looks like no one is using the OS.

Now, if you'd like to be less confrontational about this very simple concept, I'd be happy to clarify anything that still eludes you.

I can't really speak for Hamish, but he certainly didn't come across as confrontational or lacking insight to me.

Whilst stats of Wine users as a separate metric may be of value in some respects, I think it would undermine the efforts and recognition of people actually running native software if the numbers were to be mixed with people running software that pretended to be Windows, and in the end make for less accurate data rather than more accurate as you claim.

I think the assumption that Wine usage would convince a developer to support Linux is flawed. From a business perspective, if you already have Linux users buying your non-native titles, then that's a market already satisfied without the overheads of porting, extra support or testing. It would take a more insightful publisher/dev studio than most to believe that native support was worth the effort.

IMO, championing Wine usage stats is a trap.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Hamish

Quoting: MowsDoes that count me incorrectly as a windows user since I was having to run the windows version of steam to play it?

I am sorry, but I do not buy that assertion  If you are using the Windows version, why would it saying you were a Windows user be incorrect? What does WINE usage have to do with Linux client usage? I am not condemning you for anything here, but this notion that WINE statistics should count as Linux bothers me, as you are still being a Windows customer for them regardless.

You don't buy it? Well that's a little confrontational for someone who misses the point. Since you set the tone, allow me to carry it:

What are the stats on number of linux users for Steam going to be used for? Ponder that for a moment.

To save time, let me just tell you that a company questioning whether or not to port a game to linux would want to know how many potential new customers they could get for their efforts. In that respect, someone running a linux OS is what matters. The fact that a gamer is using a workaround to play something is irrelevant in the course of having accurate data to base that decision on. If linux is their os, then linux is what should be reported. Otherwise the real numbers are watered down by people using workarounds like wine, thus ultimately delaying or completely preventing linux ports because it looks like no one is using the OS.

Now, if you'd like to be less confrontational about this very simple concept, I'd be happy to clarify anything that still eludes you.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

QuoteBenchmark results:
Average FPS: 16.6
Resolution: 1440x900
Performance level: High performance

Not bad. In fact, I would say it works even better than the Valve Source games on my PC!

I tried Portal yesterday, and get the same problems as with Team fortress 2 and Counter-Strike:Source:
It looks nice and seems to be fluid sometimes, but every few seconds (or every second), it lags a bit and the sound stutters.

Note: Posting CLI output on this forum is still not very nice. I had to deal with interpreted [\size=] statements from lspci and there is no scrollbar, making this take up a lot of space.
I think [code/verbatim] tags could be quite useful... ;)

Quote$ sudo lspci -vvnn
00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RS690 Host Bridge [1002:7911]
       Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5000]
       Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap- 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort+ >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 32

00:02.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RS690 PCI to PCI Bridge (PCI Express Graphics Port 0) [1002:7913] (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
       Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 4 bytes
       Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0
       I/O behind bridge: 0000e000-0000efff
       Memory behind bridge: fdf00000-fdffffff
       Prefetchable memory behind bridge: 00000000d0000000-00000000dfffffff
       Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- <SERR- <PERR-
       BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR- NoISA- VGA+ MAbort- >Reset- FastB2B-
               PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn-
       Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 3
               Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
               Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
       Capabilities: [58] Express (v1) Root Port (Slot+), MSI 00
               DevCap: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s <64ns, L1 <1us
                       ExtTag+ RBE+ FLReset-
               DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-
                       RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+
                       MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 128 bytes
               DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq- AuxPwr- TransPend-
               LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s L1, Latency L0 <64ns, L1 <1us
                       ClockPM- Surprise- LLActRep+ BwNot-
               LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- Retrain- CommClk+
                       ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
               LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive+ BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
               SltCap: AttnBtn- PwrCtrl- MRL- AttnInd- PwrInd- HotPlug- Surprise-
                       Slot #2, PowerLimit 75.000W; Interlock- NoCompl-
               SltCtl: Enable: AttnBtn- PwrFlt- MRL- PresDet- CmdCplt- HPIrq- LinkChg-
                       Control: AttnInd Off, PwrInd Off, Power- Interlock-
               SltSta: Status: AttnBtn- PowerFlt- MRL- CmdCplt- PresDet+ Interlock-
                       Changed: MRL- PresDet+ LinkState-
               RootCtl: ErrCorrectable- ErrNon-Fatal- ErrFatal- PMEIntEna- CRSVisible-
               RootCap: CRSVisible-
               RootSta: PME ReqID 0000, PMEStatus- PMEPending-
       Capabilities: [80] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit-
               Address: 00000000  Data: 0000
       Capabilities: [b0] Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5000]
       Capabilities: [b8] HyperTransport: MSI Mapping Enable+ Fixed+
       Capabilities: [100 v3] #1002
       Kernel driver in use: pcieport
       Kernel modules: shpchp

00:06.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RS690 PCI to PCI Bridge (PCI Express Port 2) [1002:7916] (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
       Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 4 bytes
       Bus: primary=00, secondary=02, subordinate=02, sec-latency=0
       I/O behind bridge: 0000d000-0000dfff
       Memory behind bridge: fde00000-fdefffff
       Prefetchable memory behind bridge: 00000000fdb00000-00000000fdbfffff
       Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- <SERR- <PERR-
       BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR- NoISA- VGA- MAbort- >Reset- FastB2B-
               PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn-
       Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 3
               Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
               Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
       Capabilities: [58] Express (v1) Root Port (Slot+), MSI 00
               DevCap: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s <64ns, L1 <1us
                       ExtTag+ RBE+ FLReset-
               DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-
                       RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+
                       MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 128 bytes
               DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq- AuxPwr- TransPend-
               LnkCap: Port #3, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s L1, Latency L0 <64ns, L1 <1us
                       ClockPM- Surprise- LLActRep+ BwNot-
               LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- Retrain- CommClk+
                       ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
               LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive+ BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
               SltCap: AttnBtn- PwrCtrl- MRL- AttnInd- PwrInd- HotPlug- Surprise-
                       Slot #6, PowerLimit 25.000W; Interlock- NoCompl-
               SltCtl: Enable: AttnBtn- PwrFlt- MRL- PresDet- CmdCplt- HPIrq- LinkChg-
                       Control: AttnInd Off, PwrInd Off, Power- Interlock-
               SltSta: Status: AttnBtn- PowerFlt- MRL- CmdCplt- PresDet+ Interlock-
                       Changed: MRL- PresDet+ LinkState-
               RootCtl: ErrCorrectable- ErrNon-Fatal- ErrFatal- PMEIntEna- CRSVisible-
               RootCap: CRSVisible-
               RootSta: PME ReqID 0000, PMEStatus- PMEPending-
       Capabilities: [80] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit-
               Address: 00000000  Data: 0000
       Capabilities: [b0] Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5000]
       Capabilities: [b8] HyperTransport: MSI Mapping Enable+ Fixed+
       Capabilities: [100 v6] #1002
       Kernel driver in use: pcieport
       Kernel modules: shpchp

00:11.0 SATA controller [0106]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA Controller [AHCI mode] [1002:4391] (prog-if 01 [AHCI 1.0])
       Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:b002]
       Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 32
       Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 22
       Region 0: I/O ports at ff00 [\size=8]
       Region 1: I/O ports at fe00 [\size=4]
       Region 2: I/O ports at fd00 [\size=8]
       Region 3: I/O ports at fc00 [\size=4]
       Region 4: I/O ports at fb00 [\size=16]
       Region 5: Memory at fe02f000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [\size=1K]
       Capabilities: [60] Power Management version 2
               Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
               Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
       Capabilities: [70] SATA HBA v1.0 InCfgSpace
       Kernel driver in use: ahci
       Kernel modules: ahci

00:12.0 USB controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB OHCI0 Controller [1002:4397] (prog-if 10 [OHCI])
       Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5004]
       Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap- 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 32, Cache Line Size: 4 bytes
       Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16
       Region 0: Memory at fe02e000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [\size=4K]
       Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd

00:12.1 USB controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB7x0 USB OHCI1 Controller [1002:4398] (prog-if 10 [OHCI])
       Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5004]
       Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap- 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 32, Cache Line Size: 4 bytes
       Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16
       Region 0: Memory at fe02d000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [\size=4K]
       Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd

00:12.2 USB controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB EHCI Controller [1002:4396] (prog-if 20 [EHCI])
       Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5004]
       Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 32, Cache Line Size: 4 bytes
       Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 17
       Region 0: Memory at fe02c000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [\size=256]
       Capabilities: [c0] Power Management version 2
               Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold-)
               Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
               Bridge: PM- B3+
       Capabilities: [e4] Debug port: BAR=1 offset=00e0
       Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd

00:13.0 USB controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB OHCI0 Controller [1002:4397] (prog-if 10 [OHCI])
       Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5004]
       Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap- 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 32, Cache Line Size: 4 bytes
       Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 18
       Region 0: Memory at fe02b000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [\size=4K]
       Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd

00:13.1 USB controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB7x0 USB OHCI1 Controller [1002:4398] (prog-if 10 [OHCI])
       Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5004]
       Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap- 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 32, Cache Line Size: 4 bytes
       Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 18
       Region 0: Memory at fe02a000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [\size=4K]
       Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd

00:13.2 USB controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB EHCI Controller [1002:4396] (prog-if 20 [EHCI])
       Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5004]
       Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 32, Cache Line Size: 4 bytes
       Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 19
       Region 0: Memory at fe029000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [\size=256]
       Capabilities: [c0] Power Management version 2
               Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold-)
               Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
               Bridge: PM- B3+
       Capabilities: [e4] Debug port: BAR=1 offset=00e0
       Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd

00:14.0 SMBus [0c05]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SBx00 SMBus Controller [1002:4385] (rev 3a)
       Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology GA-MA770-DS3rev2.0 Motherboard [1458:4385]
       Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
       Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort+ <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Capabilities: [b0] HyperTransport: MSI Mapping Enable- Fixed+
       Kernel driver in use: piix4_smbus
       Kernel modules: sp5100_tco, i2c-piix4

00:14.1 IDE interface [0101]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 IDE Controller [1002:439c] (prog-if 8a [Master SecP PriP])
       Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5002]
       Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 32
       Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16
       Region 0: I/O ports at 01f0 [\size=8]
       Region 1: I/O ports at 03f4 [\size=1]
       Region 2: I/O ports at 0170 [\size=8]
       Region 3: I/O ports at 0374 [\size=1]
       Region 4: I/O ports at fa00 [\size=16]
       Capabilities: [70] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit-
               Address: 00000000  Data: 0000
       Kernel driver in use: pata_atiixp
       Kernel modules: pata_atiixp

00:14.2 Audio device [0403]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SBx00 Azalia (Intel HDA) [1002:4383]
       Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:a002]
       Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=slow >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 32, Cache Line Size: 4 bytes
       Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16
       Region 0: Memory at fe024000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [\size=16K]
       Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2
               Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=55mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
               Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
       Kernel driver in use: snd_hda_intel
       Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel

00:14.3 ISA bridge [0601]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 LPC host controller [1002:439d]
       Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5001]
       Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle+ MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap- 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 0

00:14.4 PCI bridge [0604]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SBx00 PCI to PCI Bridge [1002:4384] (prog-if 01 [Subtractive decode])
       Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop+ ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap- 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 64
       Bus: primary=00, secondary=03, subordinate=03, sec-latency=64
       I/O behind bridge: 0000c000-0000cfff
       Memory behind bridge: fdd00000-fddfffff
       Prefetchable memory behind bridge: fdc00000-fdcfffff
       Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort+ <SERR- <PERR-
       BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR- NoISA- VGA- MAbort- >Reset- FastB2B-
               PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn-

00:14.5 USB controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB OHCI2 Controller [1002:4399] (prog-if 10 [OHCI])
       Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5004]
       Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap- 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 32, Cache Line Size: 4 bytes
       Interrupt: pin C routed to IRQ 18
       Region 0: Memory at fe028000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [\size=4K]
       Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd

00:18.0 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor HyperTransport Configuration [1022:1200]
       Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Capabilities: [80] HyperTransport: Host or Secondary Interface
               Command: WarmRst+ DblEnd- DevNum=0 ChainSide- HostHide+ Slave- <EOCErr- DUL-
               Link Control: CFlE- CST- CFE- <LkFail- Init+ EOC- TXO- <CRCErr=0 IsocEn- LSEn+ ExtCTL- 64b-
               Link Config: MLWI=16bit DwFcIn- MLWO=16bit DwFcOut- LWI=16bit DwFcInEn- LWO=16bit DwFcOutEn-
               Revision ID: 3.00
               Link Frequency: 1.0GHz
               Link Error: <Prot- <Ovfl- <EOC- CTLTm-
               Link Frequency Capability: 200MHz+ 300MHz- 400MHz+ 500MHz- 600MHz+ 800MHz+ 1.0GHz+ 1.2GHz+ 1.4GHz- 1.6GHz- Vend-
               Feature Capability: IsocFC+ LDTSTOP+ CRCTM- ECTLT- 64bA+ UIDRD- ExtRS- UCnfE-

00:18.1 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor Address Map [1022:1201]
       Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-

00:18.2 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor DRAM Controller [1022:1202]
       Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Kernel modules: amd64_edac_mod

00:18.3 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor Miscellaneous Control [1022:1203]
       Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Capabilities: [f0] Secure device <?>
       Kernel modules: k10temp

00:18.4 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor Link Control [1022:1204]
       Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-

01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RV710 [Radeon HD 4350] [1002:954f] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
       Subsystem: PC Partner Limited Device [174b:174b]
       Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
       Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 4 bytes
       Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 41
       Region 0: Memory at d0000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [\size=256M]
       Region 2: Memory at fdfe0000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [\size=64K]
       Region 4: I/O ports at ee00 [\size=256]
       [virtual] Expansion ROM at fdf00000 [disabled] [\size=128K]
       Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 3
               Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
               Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
       Capabilities: [58] Express (v2) Legacy Endpoint, MSI 00
               DevCap: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s <4us, L1 unlimited
                       ExtTag+ AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset-
               DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-
                       RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+
                       MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 128 bytes
               DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq- AuxPwr- TransPend-
               LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s L1, Latency L0 <64ns, L1 <1us
                       ClockPM- Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot-
               LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- Retrain- CommClk+
                       ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
               LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
               DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Not Supported, TimeoutDis-
               DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis-
               LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 2.5GT/s, EnterCompliance- SpeedDis-, Selectable De-emphasis: -6dB
                        Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range, EnterModifiedCompliance- ComplianceSOS-
                        Compliance De-emphasis: -6dB
               LnkSta2: Current De-emphasis Level: -6dB, EqualizationComplete-, EqualizationPhase1-
                        EqualizationPhase2-, EqualizationPhase3-, LinkEqualizationRequest-
       Capabilities: [a0] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
               Address: 00000000fee0f00c  Data: 4169
       Capabilities: [100 v1] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0001 Rev=1 Len=010 <?>
       Kernel driver in use: radeon
       Kernel modules: radeon

01:00.1 Audio device [0403]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RV710/730 HDMI Audio [Radeon HD 4000 series] [1002:aa38]
       Subsystem: PC Partner Limited R700 Audio Device [Radeon HD 4000 Series] [174b:aa38]
       Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
       Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 4 bytes
       Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 42
       Region 0: Memory at fdffc000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [\size=16K]
       Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 3
               Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
               Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
       Capabilities: [58] Express (v2) Legacy Endpoint, MSI 00
               DevCap: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s <4us, L1 unlimited
                       ExtTag+ AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset-
               DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-
                       RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+
                       MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 128 bytes
               DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq- AuxPwr- TransPend-
               LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s L1, Latency L0 <64ns, L1 <1us
                       ClockPM- Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot-
               LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- Retrain- CommClk+
                       ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
               LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
               DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Not Supported, TimeoutDis-
               DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis-
               LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 2.5GT/s, EnterCompliance- SpeedDis-, Selectable De-emphasis: -6dB
                        Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range, EnterModifiedCompliance- ComplianceSOS-
                        Compliance De-emphasis: -6dB
               LnkSta2: Current De-emphasis Level: -6dB, EqualizationComplete-, EqualizationPhase1-
                        EqualizationPhase2-, EqualizationPhase3-, LinkEqualizationRequest-
       Capabilities: [a0] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
               Address: 00000000fee0f00c  Data: 4179
       Capabilities: [100 v1] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0001 Rev=1 Len=010 <?>
       Kernel driver in use: snd_hda_intel
       Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel

02:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller [10ec:8168] (rev 02)
       Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology GA-EP45-DS5/GA-EG45M-DS2H Motherboard [1458:e000]
       Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
       Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 4 bytes
       Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 40
       Region 0: I/O ports at de00 [\size=256]
       Region 2: Memory at fdbff000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [\size=4K]
       Region 4: Memory at fdbe0000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [\size=64K]
       [virtual] Expansion ROM at fdb00000 [disabled] [\size=64K]
       Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
               Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=375mA PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+)
               Status: D0 NoSoftRst+ PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
       Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/2 Maskable- 64bit+
               Address: 00000000fee0f00c  Data: 4161
       Capabilities: [70] Express (v1) Endpoint, MSI 01
               DevCap: MaxPayload 256 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s <512ns, L1 <8us
                       ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset-
               DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-
                       RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
                       MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 4096 bytes
               DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq- AuxPwr+ TransPend-
               LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s L1, Latency L0 <512ns, L1 <64us
                       ClockPM+ Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot-
               LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- Retrain- CommClk+
                       ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
               LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
       Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable- Count=2 Masked-
               Vector table: BAR=4 offset=00000000
               PBA: BAR=4 offset=00000800
       Capabilities: [d0] Vital Product Data
               Unknown small resource type 00, will not decode more.
       Capabilities: [100 v1] Advanced Error Reporting
               UESta:  DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
               UEMsk:  DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
               UESvrt: DLP+ SDES+ TLP- FCP+ CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF+ MalfTLP+ ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
               CESta:  RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- NonFatalErr-
               CEMsk:  RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- NonFatalErr+
               AERCap: First Error Pointer: 00, GenCap+ CGenEn- ChkCap+ ChkEn-
       Capabilities: [140 v1] Virtual Channel
               Caps:   LPEVC=0 RefClk=100ns PATEntryBits=1
               Arb:    Fixed- WRR32- WRR64- WRR128-
               Ctrl:   ArbSelect=Fixed
               Status: InProgress-
               VC0:    Caps:   PATOffset=00 MaxTimeSlots=1 RejSnoopTrans-
                       Arb:    Fixed- WRR32- WRR64- WRR128- TWRR128- WRR256-
                       Ctrl:   Enable+ ID=0 ArbSelect=Fixed TC/VC=ff
                       Status: NegoPending- InProgress-
       Capabilities: [160 v1] Device Serial Number 12-34-56-78-12-34-56-78
       Kernel driver in use: r8169
       Kernel modules: r8169

03:06.0 Network controller [0280]: Ralink corp. RT2561/RT61 802.11g PCI [1814:0301]
       Subsystem: Ralink corp. EW-7108PCg/EW-7128g [1814:2561]
       Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=slow >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 32, Cache Line Size: 4 bytes
       Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 20
       Region 0: Memory at fddf8000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [\size=32K]
       Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2
               Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
               Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
       Kernel driver in use: rt61pci
       Kernel modules: rt61pci

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Proof: http://i.imgur.com/T6ZHzOd.png
My G+ page: https://plus.google.com/117435119371274250792/posts

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Running Enterprise firefox on this laptop which is old enough the demo told me to get a new browser. Definitely want to give this a try on my desktop...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Running great on AMD 6670, Xubuntu 12.04 and Firefox 20. The nightlys are more optimized though.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: MowsDoes that count me incorrectly as a windows user since I was having to run the windows version of steam to play it?

I am sorry, but I do not buy that assertion  If you are using the Windows version, why would it saying you were a Windows user be incorrect? What does WINE usage have to do with Linux client usage? I am not condemning you for anything here, but this notion that WINE statistics should count as Linux bothers me, as you are still being a Windows customer for them regardless.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Worked fine with r600g as well.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Espero que esta vez tenga suerte. Gracias!! 

Twitter ---> https://www.dropbox.com/s/1suf97uh44c4xbi/postal1.jpg
Google + ---> https://www.dropbox.com/s/11m7ey1tus89urs/postal.jpg

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Hey all,

We would love to bring Snuggle Truck to Linux. It would involve upgrading our project to Unity 4 and dealing with all of the things that break in the upgrade. We're looking for an additional engineer to help with things like that, and if the position gets filled, you'll see Snuggle Truck on Linux some time in the future :)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

So if you weren’t going to back it due to a stretch goal, I don't see why not since now it will be coming.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

WOO!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Only bad thing about this game is the amount of sleep I'm not going to get when it arrives ...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: MowsThe big question I have is the way this is calculated. I was playing a lot of New Vegas in April using WINE. Does that count me incorrectly as a windows user since I was having to run the windows version of steam to play it?

These metrics are useless until we know how accurately they're being compiled.

A number of Steam users are prompted to voluntarily participate in the survey each month. If you didn't receive a prompt to participate, then your details are not included in the results. There's a summary window prior to submission which lists all of the information collected. When running in Wine, this shows the Windows version that Wine is configured to emulate as the operating system version (whether this is incorrect is definitely debatable :) ).

If you're looking for more reading, I've compiled all the solid information that I've been able to find here.

Edit: Wine and Gecko are listed as installed software, but it's unclear as to whether or not this has any bearing in the results seen on the Steam website - I'd hazard a guess and say none.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

The big question I have is the way this is calculated. I was playing a lot of New Vegas in April using WINE. Does that count me incorrectly as a windows user since I was having to run the windows version of steam to play it?

These metrics are useless until we know how accurately they're being compiled.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I'm in! =) http://imgur.com/EzAfE3a

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Just tested it on Fedora 18 with nvidia blob drivers and firefox 20 from the fedora repo and its working great :)

View this comment - View article - View full comments