Quoting: GuestNaive question but did those game sell well ?

Yes
http://steamspy.com/app/291650 [External Link] 1M+
http://steamspy.com/app/240760 [External Link] 500K+
http://steamspy.com/app/362960 [External Link] 200k+
but less than the divinity games

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: GuestYou mean above the usual 1-1.5% ? You piqued my curiosity. :)

I have the feeling that Linux gamer are more core PC gamer than console gamer. So they tend to play more to niche PC games than mainstream one. It's just a feeling through, maybe Liam have the numbers on it

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: EikeWith Larian not Porting Divinity 2, that's basically a whole genre (classic CRPGs) gone, no?

Nah, there is the indy scene and some new actors like Pathfinder: Kingmaker, but sure the niche market is badly hurt on Linux. And it is certainly a move on Linux, the crpg games do not sell well and do not sell at all on console, but I think they had a prety respectable share of Linux sales.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Nice news, Mount and Blade is one of my favorite video game.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Purple Library Guy3. Microsoft have been systematically funneling patents to sort of deniably-affiliated patent trolls and siccing those patent trolls on its opponents rather than getting its own hands dirty, thus allowing it to have its propaganda cake and eat its enemies too. Joining the OIN makes no difference whatsoever to use of this tactic. This is a very important point if true, and would indeed make MS joining the OIN a worthless and deeply cynical move. I have seen techrights articles making this claim before. I've never seen anyone else discussing it, whether to agree or debunk it, so I'm not sure if it's true or not.

They sometimes link to legal decisions https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20180904118 [External Link] it's legal stuff so it mostly available but hard to find. Who have founded which patent troll is an info available on wikipedia or on legal site about society creation. Techrigths mostly link second hand sources, but it is still possible to go to the legal source by following links. But then, the legal stuff is pretty much unreadable

View this comment - View article - View full comments

The style is ranty as hell, but I never saw them lying and even if they mostly source themselves, when they write their articles, the info used are everywhere on the news.
So I'm still cautious about them but no more than with mainstream newspaper from my country

View this comment - View article - View full comments

http://techrights.org/2018/10/10/lotnetwork-msft-and-now-oin/ [External Link]
A more in depth answer about what it is not a good news as it may seems superficially.
Basically, Microsoft still does tons of patent trolling, he does not have given to OIN the patent used on patent trolling and the move can be seen as a way to legitimate software patent.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: AppelsinI'd wager assimilation rather than protection. As for protection, I suspect it's more a case of "if we can't steal 'em, noone else will get to either."

But they get tons of money from patent attack on Linux (directly or via patent troll, look for intelectual venture founded by Gate & co).
Maybe its war between services but assimilation is the most likely, Linux is no longer a threat, why?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Has Microsoft stop lending patent to patent troll attacking GNU/Linux users?
http://techrights.org/2018/10/04/patent-trolls-as-microsoft-enforcers/ [External Link]

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I don't use Youtube (or any google services) I want to have a bit of control on the data I leak.

What is the content of the video? Trolling about Linux?

View this comment - View article - View full comments