Every article tag can be clicked to get a list of all articles in that category. Every article tag also has an RSS feed! You can customize an RSS feed too!
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

How SteamOS could become a better console competitor

By - | Views: 33,538

What is SteamOS?

SteamOS is the console OS from Valve to turn PCs into consoles, but with PC things you love such as the ability to mod and use PC software. But it puts them in an easy to use package with a controller on the TV and removes some hassle that operating systems like Windows, Mac, Ubuntu (or other Linux distributions with a desktop GUI) and FreeBSD includes.

SteamOS grabs the drivers and updates the OS from within SteamOS Big Picture Mode. With Windows you have to download the newest drivers from websites and from Ubuntu you have to go to choose the drivers, then update them in the system updater, and then open steam. These all work and aren't particularly difficult but add a bit more hassle into a gaming experience.

SteamOS has little bumps in the road that prevent it from being a good console alternative for people who aren't used to the PC market.

Playable Games

SteamOS still has a way off having all games or games by default coming to both SteamOS and Windows, thus they need a better way of handling content not available for SteamOS coming into consumers eyes that they can't use. Currently if you open the store and go to Featured, you have a high chance of seeing some Windows only deal on the right hand side. For any Windows user it's like seeing Halo or Uncharted on the front page of Steam just to be told that you can't play it on Windows but need to go grab a PS4 instead. This is something that used to be a much bigger problem for Big Picture Mode as it used to just show whatever people running Windows would see, but to say it's not a problem currently is an issue.

People also realize there's a PC and phone client and a web app, which is great, but the problem with that is that Windows only games are shown there, possibly making SteamOS users feel upset about games they can't get. A solution could be to only show games that are available for all platforms by default, then choose the platforms you game on, and thus the front page would always only show you games you can play regardless of device.

Another difficulty people may have is that they're probably using a Steam Machine in a front room with no keyboard and mouse. They only have the Steam controller, which is great, and works with many more games than ordinary Dualshock 4s and Xbox 360 controllers, but there are still games that require a keyboard and/or mouse. Pony Island is one, you need a keyboard there to type. Sure you could use the onscreen keyboard option but that is a pain, is not practical in some games and is a lot less enjoyable than a keyboard. My solution to this would be, if you're in big picture mode with only a Steam controller connected, by default the only games that should show up are games that have full controller support or games that you can beat from beginning to end with a Steam controller—even if they originally needed a keyboard and mouse. This should include games that need keyboard and mouse if the system detects one, or one is selected in the store's settings screen.

Oneof the worst issues with Steam Machines is the confusion. What hardware we should buy is a problem we're going to have to deal with, but if a game works or not on your system with the current drivers shouldn't be a problem any more with SteamOS. SteamOS detects your hardware and Steam version, and knows the minimum system requirements for a game, so why not hide games with minimum system requirements that aren't met? This means gamers won't be disappointed that they can't play their game they just bought and that it's extremely laggy.

Please note that any game that I'm saying should be hid by default, should have an option not to hide. People who have the capabilities or are willing to deal with certain difficulties should be able to, just customers who perhaps don't have as much knowledge as hardcore gamers shouldn't have to risk these issues.



Separation of Media’s

Steam currently has several issues with displaying medias in Big Picture Mode. When you go to the store page the games and movies have an icon or a banner in which it shows a bit of the media the same way a bit of box art would. The issue is that they aren't separated at all, there's never anything to say which media it belongs to. The only thing below the icon is a price tag, possibly with a discount sticker with it. The only way you find out if the media is a game or movie is if you click on it, which isn't exactly a chore but makes the system seem less cohesive.

Steam does address this in some tabs a little further down if you wish to segregate medias inside a tab named “Browse”. This offers you to browse Games or Videos, so perhaps this isn't that big of an issue, but it should be talked about.

Now while we're talking about medias and videos, how can I miss out, Youtube and Netflix? There’s no app for SteamOS, simple enough. You can easily access these providers and many more via the internet browser but the UI isn't good, it's not fun, and is awful for a consumer. There's also no picture viewer or USB media playback. This means you can't browse photos on a USB stick or watch movies downloaded legally on your TV with the Steam Machine unless you pull yourself out of Big Picture Mode and into the desktop mode.

Perhaps a small amount of people like to view images on their TV via their console, but I'm sure many people use their consoles to play other media like music and videos. Whether that be via a USB stick, or YouTube, or Netflix, there are already tabs for music and videos. Why not let people import their own, and add a tab for apps and try to get big internet players on board?

Boot like a console

Currently SteamOS—at least on the Cyber, this is less true with the Alienware Steam Machine—is you turn it on, you get a BIOS screen, then a Steam Machine logo. Then sometimes it'll go to a SteamOS logo with a bar underneath it, go black for several seconds and then show the Big Picture splash screen.

With Alienware the BIOS screen doesn't show up—this as a console is a good thing. The BIOS screen makes it feel like a desktop when it should feel like a console. Just have a SteamOS boot screen in which you can go into the BIOS by holding down a button on the Steam controller or keyboard but don't make it look like a BIOS screen. Make it a SteamOS logo screen, then after a second or so of waiting the splash screen should awaken and let the players play.

The Steam Machine also boots games pretty slowly, perhaps this is a hardware issue, but for a console that costs double or more than a Playstation 4, the PS4 shouldn't boot games faster than the Steam Machine...

Adverts

Now that most uncertainties of SteamOS have a solution the next is selling devices and getting games. The first step is to let people know it exists, get some advert time on TV, get advert space and advertise like crazy, get bigger slots in game retailers for hardware, make Steam stores. Just get out there, and give the world SteamOS and Steam on Linux.

Exclusives

Now Valve has said there wont be any SteamOS exclusives from them:

Valve’s Greg Comer[Y]ou won’t see an exclusive killer app for SteamOS from us. We’re not going to be doing that kind of thing.


Source

I think this is negative for SteamOS; without exclusives there's little reason for anyone to try and use SteamOS or Linux. If they created Half life 3 and it was only available for SteamOS/Linux then you know a lot of people would install Ubuntu or SteamOS and may start to use it as their main gaming OS. If every new game comes to both systems and the exclusives are the difference between HL3, Portal 3, Team Fortress 3 on Linux and Halo Reach on Windows.

What do you think? What do you think would make SteamOS better and more successful in the mainstream?

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Editorial, Steam
0 Likes
The comments on this article are closed.
46 comments
Page: «2/5»
  Go to:

bubexel Feb 20, 2016
Isn't microsoft making his game exclusivly for windows?
Keyrock Feb 20, 2016
"I think this is negative for SteamOS; without exclusives there's little reason for anyone to try and use SteamOS or Linux. If they created Half life 3 and it was only available for SteamOS/Linux then you know a lot of people would install Ubuntu or SteamOS and may start to use it as their main gaming OS. If every new game comes to both systems and the exclusives are the difference between HL3, Portal 3, Team Fortress 3 on Linux and Halo Reach on Windows."

While, from a business and marketing standpoint, exclusives make sense, as a consumer, I will NEVER EVER favor exclusives. Exclusives are anti-consumer, plain and simple. No amount of sweet talk and marketing double speak will change this fact, and it is a FACT. This is not disputable. Exclusives never benefit consumers, the generally don't even benefit the developer/publisher, unless the exclusivity deal is extremely favorable, they generally only benefit the manufacturers of the platform it is exclusive to. Exclusives create rifts between the consumer base and stupid fanboy wars. They serve to divide and conquer the consumer base and turn us against each other to create a buying frenzy.

Would a major exclusive benefit SteamOS as a gaming platform. Potentially yes. Would I be in favor of such a thing. HELL NO. As much as I want Linux/SteamOS to succeed as a gaming platform, I'm not willing to give into the pure evil that is platform exclusives.
devland Feb 20, 2016
QuoteI think this is negative for SteamOS; without exclusives there's little reason for anyone to try and use SteamOS or Linux.

How about having a platform that is open and doesn't spy on you which is free and easy to customize?
How about having a superior experience to the rest? How about having a better product for the same or even lower price?
Exclusives are bad, regardless of the platform. Valve understands this. You don't.


Last edited by devland on 20 February 2016 at 8:44 am UTC
rkfg Feb 20, 2016
One exclusive is a good thing if it motivates to buy the platform. There should be a tangible motivation factor to buy a Steam Machine. For some it's a nice living room gadget but that's not enough to turn the tides. As was mentioned before, XBox/PS have an exclusive title that sells the platform, after that people would need more titles to run on the console (or else why have they bought it for?), hence the demand grows. Same for Steam Machines, one title to motivate, more titles to hold. What are the downsides?
sub Feb 20, 2016
Quoting: EagleDeltaFor the Exclusives, SteamOS/Steam itself already has a couple killer exclusives:

1. Buy once, play anywhere. Not just the same vendor platform (Like what MS is doing with XBone and Win10), but ANY platform the game is on for steam, you can play it on that platform. Another nice little piece of the pie is that I never have to re-buy classics to play them again. My biggest complaint about the emulation of older classics on newer consoles is that they HAVE to be re-bought every generation.

[....]


From my experience, that's still a big illusion currently.
Savegames are in most cases not shared across different platforms, accessible via Steamcloud.

In the end that makes it a feature of very, very little value.
aL Feb 20, 2016
I tried to buy an steambox this winter, but dell insisted that I had to send them an easy to fake document (an scanned bill) to prove where I live... So I refused to continue the transaction. (Hell, most of my bills are html nowadays. I dont even have to gimp in anything!)

Im looking forward to buy an steambox announced on the store of steam to boost sales... I can afford it... If only they were easy to buy...
ChloeWolfieGirl Feb 20, 2016
I understand that exclusives are bad for consumers, and that if you have the money your game should come out on all platforms.

The reason I think its different for linux exclusives is that people can obtain and use it for free, theres no lock out as its free and easy to use, where as xbox, and sony's exclusives mean a person has to go out to buy some hardware which offers to lock them into there ecosystems, offering little to no freedom and stopping people with low incomes getting a game because someone's greedy.

A linux exclusive might not be openly inclusive but anyone who has any kind of computer can obtain it.

Having a console thats got a better experience at a lower price isn't good enough for gamers because then there’s more exclusives and thus more reason to buy a playstation, If every xbox game comes to pc and playstation while playstation and pc keeps there exclusives, who's ever going to buy a xbox, you have all the games on xbox on playstation and pc, and its the games that are important.

I dont think its right that I should have to buy a xbox one to be able to play halo or banjo kazooie, but its the world we live in right now, and if sony didn't have as many, the most exclusives in my favourite areas, then I wouldn't have bought a PS4.

Valve already do exclusives, other then orange box on the xb360 and portal2 on the ps3, valve games aren't on consoles, wheres surgeon simulator on xbo or half life on the PS4?

I'm not saying the games have to be exclusives for all time, perhaps have them as a 4 months exclusive then come to everything else, but steam already does exclusives, they still have windows only games.

SteamOS has exclusives away from consoles, but they're all available on windows, If gamers want to play half life, they need windows, xbox360 or Linux, street fighter v isn't on xbox one, but is coming to steamOS, same with other games like danganronpa, we have reasons why people should get a steam machine over a xbox one, but if everyone has a laptop or desktop then unless the computers not powerful enough, then how much point is there, you get more games that work a bit better on windows then steamOS or Linux in anyway, and you're comfortable with windows and your xbo.
ChloeWolfieGirl Feb 20, 2016
Quoting: NyamiouYou can play Typing of The Dead (not a Linux game) with the Steam Controller onscreen keyboard :
View video on youtube.com

So once you get used to it, I don't think any game that require a keyboard from time to time is going to be that much of a problem.

For me the biggest problem with the Steam Machines is the price, I would gladly pay 450$ for an Alienware Steam Machine but in France the basic one actually cost 600€ which is 670$, this is outrageously expensive for what it is. For comparison, a PS4 cost 350$ in the US, 350€ (390$) in France, so the taxes are not an excuse for Alienware to add 220$ which is almost a 50% rise in price. The Materiel.net Steam Machine is a way better choice for us (way more performances for the price), but it costs 800€ and I don't want to spend that amount of money right now.

Thats a good example of people being able to use the onscreen keyboard well and good.

Pricing is a big issue to and the fact that you can't see them in stores.

Quoting: maodzedunExclusives are a dead trick - Xbox One has more and better exclusives than PS4. It still gets it's rear kicked by Sony.

I strongly disagree with this, Xbox One doesn't have that many great exclusives in my opinion, I'd only be interested in an xbox one for rare's collection and halo, where as the ps4 has gravity rush, persona 5, ratchet and clank, the last guardian, blood born, disgaea 5, uncharted, Yakuza.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Xbox_One_games
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Playstation_4_games

But obviously some of this is personal taste, Lets look at the wii-u
http://www.inquisitr.com/1611525/smash-bros-wii-u-to-double-console-sales-nintendo-thinks-so/
Exclusives sell, they're the only reason to get a wii-u.

But from what you've earlier said, making half life 3 would hurt the game, but would make a lot of people look at getting a steam machine or putting linux on there computer, its just would they rather have more gamers from launch and thus more sales, or would they rather ween more people off windows? other companys don't have the insentive or care to ween people off windows, where as valve does, and I think its a easier and more effective way to get AMD and Nvidia to bring better drivers and bring linux a much higher present in the market then 1%
then ps4+Pc,
Liam Dawe Feb 20, 2016
I'm torn on it all myself.

Exclusives are evil, I agree with that, but I also agree with the author that for the general gamer Linux/SteamOS really doesn't offer them anything they don't have right now on Windows.

What would be great to have is things like Netflix, I think Valve have missed the mark on that one. I know it's not up to Valve, but I do wonder if they have had a chat with Netflix about it.
wojtek88 Feb 20, 2016
According to my knowledge Steam OS is missing important boot feature - booting machine on remote controller button press. I can't imagine living without that functionality on my living room's pc after I started to use ps4. Without that functionality, for me, it's still pc, not a console experience.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.