Every article tag can be clicked to get a list of all articles in that category. Every article tag also has an RSS feed! You can customize an RSS feed too!
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

Linux Mint 20 has today been officially released across multiple official desktop environments and it's all sounding great. The Cinnamon desktop edition sounding especially good.

This is the first Linux Mint release to be based upon Ubuntu 20.04, the latest Long-Term Support release so you can keep on using Linux Mint 20 happily until around 2025. If you're looking for a good starting point with Linux, Mint is often a good choice.

Pictured: Linux Mint 20 Cinnamon

Linux Mint 20 will likely see 2-3 point releases, all supported until 2025 and all made from the same base Mint 20. They no longer chase all the interim Ubuntu releases so they can focus on keeping things stable, this should mean upgrades to Mint 20.1 and 20.2 should be quite easy.

With this latest release, there's lots of fun new features included. For the Cinnamon edition, the biggest is the inclusion of fractional scaling for the UI along with each monitor being able to be scaled differently. Another big improvement is better support for NVIDIA Optimus out of the box, as their included applet easily allows you to pick your GPU from its menu. It also now support the NVIDIA "On-Demand" profile too. For gamers, the Optimus improvements are a big plus.

Some other nice fluff improvements came with it, like the Welcome app letting you pick a colour scheme easily.

More improvements can be found elsewhere like the improved system tray icon system, a new application named Warpinator to easily share files across networks, Nemo file manager performance improvements and the Gdebi tool used to manually install .deb files was given a fresh look.

The most controversial change in Linux Mint 20 is their disabling of Snap packages by default. Snap is the Canonical-backed next-gen Linux packaging format, which Mint's Clément Lefèbvre is not currently a fan of for various reasons like the Chromium package on Ubuntu actually being empty and just sets up a Snap instead. Their reasoning goes a lot deeper than that though, including Snaps being from one centralized store. If you want to read more on Mint's stance on Snaps, see here.

Additionally, the is the first time the Mint team have gone 64bit only as they've retired the 32bit downloads.

The currently released editions are:

Are you a Linux Mint or Cinnamon fan? Let us know what you think of the latest releases in the comments.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
15 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly came back to check on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. Find me on Mastodon.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
51 comments
Page: «3/6»
  Go to:

ageres Jun 29, 2020
I've read Chromium browser was removed from the official repositories. What was the reason for that?
DefaultX-od Jun 29, 2020
Quoting: ageresI've read Chromium browser was removed from the official repositories. What was the reason for that?
Reason is snapshaming. And it's should be stopped!
Schattenspiegel Jun 29, 2020
Quoting: DefaultX-odReason is snapshaming. And it's should be stopped!
I am actually quite happy that Mint tries to stop the Snapification that Canonical tries to force down peoples throats.
Reminds me to much of Windows 10 way of doing things to be comfortable with it.
Snaps and flatpaks can be useful, but on a normal users desktop they should always only be offered as alternatives to traditional packages, because they waste space, computing power and the time of every user compared to them.
DefaultX-od Jun 29, 2020
Quoting: Schattenspiegel
Quoting: DefaultX-odReason is snapshaming. And it's should be stopped!
I am actually quite happy that Mint tries to stop the Snapification that Canonical tries to force down peoples throats.
Reminds me to much of Windows 10 way of doing things to be comfortable with it.
Snaps and flatpaks can be useful, but on a normal users desktop they should always only be offered as alternatives to traditional packages, because they waste space, computing power and the time of every user compared to them.

What space is it wasting? We are not in 1999, almost everyone have enough space to never run out, but if they don't HDD is not that costly anymore.
Me myself ran into dependencies hell, so I think that normal users will prefer snaps.
The only thing I don't like about them is that it's take too much time to start, and they're less responsive, but it will be fixed
ageres Jun 29, 2020
Quoting: DefaultX-odReason is snapshaming. And it's should be stopped!
If I understand correctly, Chromium has been removed from APT repos too. Or not?
Schattenspiegel Jun 29, 2020
Quoting: DefaultX-odWhat space is it wasting? We are not in 1999, almost everyone have enough space to never run out, but if they don't HDD is not that costly anymore.
Me myself ran into dependencies hell, so I think that normal users will prefer snaps.
The only thing I don't like about them is that it's take too much time to start, and they're less responsive, but it will be fixed

Just because I have a spacious living room does not mean I want to clutter it with three generations worth of furniture. Wastefulness stays wastefulness regardless of the surrounding circumstances and Software has become quite bloated anyway over the last couple of years. We do not buy better, faster, bigger machines every few years just to run more inefficiently written or packaged software, do we?

Quoting: DefaultX-odMe myself ran into dependencies hell, so I think that normal users will prefer snaps.
Sorry you burned your fingers, but Appimage would be able solve the problem there without the additional "features" and dependencies of Snaps or Flatpacks and it would be easier for the novice user to keep his system clean.
Quoting: DefaultX-odThe only thing I don't like about them is that it's take too much time to start, and they're less responsive, but it will be fixed
If that is fixable, the why not fix it first and then offer it to people?


Last edited by Schattenspiegel on 29 June 2020 at 9:51 am UTC
Schattenspiegel Jun 29, 2020
Quoting: ageres
Quoting: DefaultX-odReason is snapshaming. And it's should be stopped!
If I understand correctly, Chromium has been removed from APT repos too. Or not?
Ubuntu removed it from the APT repos and automatically offered to install the snap instead (they say it is easier to maintain for them that way) - since Linux Mint does share a large part of the Ubuntu repos they would either have to offer the same redirection to snap (which they do not want - read the their blog if you want to know more), package it themselves (which would would be a considerable additional workload for so small a team and not really justified given there are quite a few alternative browsers avaliable and google does not offer it prepackaged themselves) or block the installation with a message stating the reasons behind it and giving you simple directions how to install it anyway, if you insist on using it (which is the way they chose for now).
Redface Jun 29, 2020
Quoting: Schattenspiegel
Quoting: ageres
Quoting: DefaultX-odReason is snapshaming. And it's should be stopped!
If I understand correctly, Chromium has been removed from APT repos too. Or not?
Ubuntu removed it from the APT repos and automatically offered to install the snap instead (they say it is easier to maintain for them that way) - since Linux Mint does share a large part of the Ubuntu repos they would either have to offer the same redirection to snap (which they do not want - read the their blog if you want to know more), package it themselves (which would would be a considerable additional workload for so small a team and not really justified given there are quite a few alternative browsers avaliable and google does not offer it prepackaged themselves) or block the installation with a message stating the reasons behind it and giving you simple directions how to install it anyway, if you insist on using it (which is the way they chose for now).

Ubuntu still has Chromium as a deb package for 16.04 and 18.04. That they have so many supported releases is the reason they switched to snaps for newer releases. Currently the same snap is used for 19.10, 20.04 and 20.10 currently under development.

It takes to many resources for a optional package in universe to package it for so many, and especially the older releases.

The choice was to not have chromium at all or a snap according to a post I saw.

Popos did not want a snap so they build it as a deb for 19.10 and 20.04. I have tried it on Ubuntu, but not tested it much. If someone really wants a deb on 20.04 then getting that package from Popos is an option with pinning (much better than the Debian version build against other library version which some suggest)

But instead of packaging it them self or working with Popos Mint chose to make it harder to install Chromium for their users.
Redface Jun 29, 2020
Quoting: Guest
Quoting: Redface
Quoting: Schattenspiegel
Quoting: ageres
Quoting: DefaultX-odReason is snapshaming. And it's should be stopped!
If I understand correctly, Chromium has been removed from APT repos too. Or not?
Ubuntu removed it from the APT repos and automatically offered to install the snap instead (they say it is easier to maintain for them that way) - since Linux Mint does share a large part of the Ubuntu repos they would either have to offer the same redirection to snap (which they do not want - read the their blog if you want to know more), package it themselves (which would would be a considerable additional workload for so small a team and not really justified given there are quite a few alternative browsers avaliable and google does not offer it prepackaged themselves) or block the installation with a message stating the reasons behind it and giving you simple directions how to install it anyway, if you insist on using it (which is the way they chose for now).

Ubuntu still has Chromium as a deb package for 16.04 and 18.04. That they have so many supported releases is the reason they switched to snaps for newer releases. Currently the same snap is used for 19.10, 20.04 and 20.10 currently under development.

It takes to many resources for a optional package in universe to package it for so many, and especially the older releases.

The choice was to not have chromium at all or a snap according to a post I saw.

Popos did not want a snap so they build it as a deb for 19.10 and 20.04. I have tried it on Ubuntu, but not tested it much. If someone really wants a deb on 20.04 then getting that package from Popos is an option with pinning (much better than the Debian version build against other library version which some suggest)

But instead of packaging it them self or working with Popos Mint chose to make it harder to install Chromium for their users.
Until Snap is made open source, it shouldn't be used. Your choices are add a PPA for Chromium, install the snap for Chromium anyway even though it's proprietary, or use another browser.
snapd including the snap command is not just open source but free software under the GPL v3: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/blob/master/COPYING
Quoting: GuestThe best solution would be for someone to release a flatpak or appimage of Chromium. That way, everyone could use it across all Linux distros, and no one would be locked into proprietary software while doing so.
Snaps run under most (or all?) Linux distros. See the logarithmic graph at https://snapcraft.io/chromium to see on how many different distributions people installed the Chromium snap. And Chromium is still open source also when packaged as a snap: https://code.launchpad.net/~chromium-team/chromium-browser/+git/snap-from-source

What is a problem for some and I also do not like that, is that snaps by default only come from Canonicals servers. You can not add extra snap repositories.
And while you could point snapd to your own servers you will have to implement all the functionality your self and the snaps from Canonicals snapcraft will not be available out of the box.
Or install snaps manually with the --dangerous flag which disbales autoupdates for them
There is a long discussion about that here: https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/external-repositories/1760
DefaultX-od Jun 29, 2020
flatpak install flathub org.libreoffice.LibreOffice

snap install libreoffice

who would win?
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.