You can sign up to get a daily email of our articles, see the Mailing List page!

Recently a big controversy surrounding the Free Software Community appeared and cut deep into the community when it was announced without warning that Richard Stallman (RMS) had returned.

This controversy reached a boiling point, as we covered before with a petition to have Stallman removed. Since then, the FSF repeatedly put out statements about their policies, things that will change, people resigning, a Twitter post and more - but not once did the FSF mention Stallman or what the heck was going on. Finally, multiple weeks later, both the FSF and Stallman have released new statements.

In the FSF statement, it's mentioned that FSF staff had no idea what was going on and neither did organisers of LibrePlanet where RMS returning was announced. RMS was voted back in by voting members and the board of directors after "several months of thorough discussion and thoughtful deliberation". The FSF acknowledge how "badly we handled the news of his election to a board seat" and take "full responsibility". With RMS back on the board as an "unpaid volunteer" the rules still apply including "prohibitions against conflicts of interest and sexual harassment and those outlining whistleblower processes and fiduciary duties". The FSF linked to the changes the organisation is committed to implementing and will "continue to pursue additional ideas and actions designed to improve transparency and accountability".

RMS clearly isn't going anywhere, as the FSF see "his views will be critical to the FSF as we advance the mission and confront the challenges that software freedom faces".

While it took a while, it seems like the FSF are fully aware of their need to improve everything surrounding this. We should give them some points on that.

As for the statement directly from Stallman, it goes over and actually acknowledges some real personal issues and social problems. Then leading into the comments Stallman made about the likes of Marvin Minsky and Jeffrey Epstein, mentioning how the comments were "tone-deaf that I didn't acknowledge as context the injustice that Epstein did to women or the pain that caused". Stallman ends the post with "I've learned something from this about how to be kind to people who have been hurt. In the future, that will help me be kind to people in other situations, which is what I hope to do.".

It will be interesting to see what happens as a result of the public apologies from both Stallman and the FSF. Let's hope that all of this can lead somewhere productive and have less in-fighting with more fighting for software freedom.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Meta, Misc
17 Likes , Who?
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. We are currently affiliated with GOG and Humble Store. See more here.
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly came back to check on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
29 comments
Page: 1/3»
  Go to:

psymin 12 Apr
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
This is great to hear <3
CSharp 12 Apr
I'm very happy the FSF has made up it's mind and is looking for a path forward. The fact that they took several weeks to discuss this is a good sign IMO. No rash decision in response to an outraged mob. :D
BielFPs 12 Apr
cj
scaine 12 Apr
View PC info
  • Contributing Editor
  • Supporter Plus
I'm not outraged, but Stallman, and hence the FSF, can definitely get in the bin. The fact that they took weeks to address something as simple as voting back in a confirmed abuser to their board shows me all I need to know about this organisation.

Pretty incredible really. I don't trust them to represent my interests in free software at this point.
The free software movement is clearly dead if it so badly needs Stallman in a position of leadership. One man cannot be bigger than the free software movement and frankly the STallman cultists have proven that Stallman is bigger than the FSF and thus the free software movement.
Kithop 12 Apr
Quoting: scaineI'm not outraged, but Stallman, and hence the FSF, can definitely get in the bin. The fact that they took weeks to address something as simple as voting back in a confirmed abuser to their board shows me all I need to know about this organisation.

Pretty incredible really. I don't trust them to represent my interests in free software at this point.

Pretty much the entire rest of the industry has stopped trusting them, too. At best, we'll see another org fork in the vein of OpenOffice/LibreOffice, ffmpeg/libav, etc.
tomaszg 12 Apr
Sad he had to apologize. It's only encouraging more attacks of this kind on other people.
CSharp 12 Apr
Quoting: scaineconfirmed abuser

Sources?
Quoting: tomaszgSad he had to apologize. It's only encouraging more attacks of this kind on other people.

I think he needs to apologize more, perhaps a bit of groveling thrown in. And sheesh, the wording. "Women" Stallman, seriously? Stallman's rap sheet is long, ranging far beyond just comments about a pedophile.
Quoting: tomaszgSad he had to apologize. It's only encouraging more attacks of this kind on other people.

Agreed. Apoligizing to the mob will only make it worse, never better. Forgivness will never be on the table with these people.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Patreon, Liberapay or PayPal Donation.

We have no adverts, no paywalls, no timed exclusive articles. Just good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.