Don't want to see articles from a certain category? When logged in, go to your User Settings and adjust your feed in the Content Preferences section where you can block tags!
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

Talking Point: how about a monthly Steam Game Pass from Valve

By - | Views: 31,575

Subscriptions, they're everywhere and more seem to appear all the time. So, what IF Valve were to announce their own Steam Game Pass to give you access to a great many games?

Let's be realistic here though - Valve doesn't need one. Steam is and will be for a long time to come, a money printing machine because of the user share they have across PC platforms (Linux, macOS and Windows). However, Valve do have competition increasing all the time. Not just from the Epic Games Store but thinking more on the likes of the Xbox Game Pass Ultimate - which includes a ton of games along with upcoming game streaming support too. That has proven extremely popular for Microsoft and services like that absolutely will pull people away from buying more games on Steam. Why would you, after all, if you can get 100+ (and growing) AA/AAA and indie games often close to release in a single subscription?

It's something I've been thinking on for a long time, and I've probably mentioned it in some previous articles. I speculated a little back when the subscription and rewards features for Steam leaked out. Although that turned into the points shop and allowing the likes of EA Play and the Crusader Kings II - Expansion Subscription. So now Valve allows other developers to use subscriptions but what about Valve directly though? Are they going to bring out their own, should they do it and would you actually use it?

Many questions! Some of which I posed to our Twitter followers (#1, #2) with the results being quite surprising. A small sample with the majority thinking Valve aren't doing one but 50/50 for people who want it versus not wanting it. I actually expected the question of people wanting it or not to swing quite hard one way which it clearly didn't.

For gamers, it might work out to be more cost effective to have a subscription. Thinking on the cost of these subscription services, it can work out at the price of 1-2 AAA games a year to gain access to tons. You would have to play quite a few of them to actually make it worth it - but a lot of people would probably forget about that part. Even if you're only interested in a few of the games, it could still work out as reasonably good value. For a store like Steam, compared to streaming services, being able to choose between outright buying and subscribing to have access gives the best of both worlds (compared with the likes of Stadia, where it's streaming-only and if it's gone, it's gone even if you "buy" it).

The drawback for developers though is monies. It all depends on the revenue split of each subscription, likely based on how much time is put into each title which could end up being worse for smaller developers who often struggle on Steam as it is. There's a lot of different angles like that to think on. What sort of levels would the subscription have? It could be interesting with different selections like Indie Gems, AAA classics and so on. Could even be an additional bit of marketing for developers as people might spots games from the lists they want to actually buy from it. Also, as a reminder, you don't actually own what you buy on Steam, as per the Steam Subscriber Agreement you get a license to play it.

A Steam Game Pass would probably be quite popular if Valve actually did it though, but will they?

Over to you in the comments: what are you thoughts on if Valve actually did a Steam Game Pass system?

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Editorial, Misc, Steam
12 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly came back to check on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. Find me on Mastodon.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
38 comments
Page: «2/4»
  Go to:

Koopacabras May 23, 2021
Quoting: Creak
QuoteAlso, as a reminder, you don't actually own what you buy on Steam, as per the Steam Subscriber Agreement you get a license to play it.

@Liam legally, you never own a game, even if you buy a hard copy. The same goes for music and movies. You have a license to listen/watch/play them, but you don't own them as you don't have any rights on the intellectual property.

But I think you wanted to point out that owning a copy of a game is different than buying a game on Steam, as Steam games can have DRM which prevent you from playing offline.

right in other words the agreement that liam quotes says that you don't OWN the game... you actually own a license. That's true.

but let's stretch this a little further... do you legally own all the free software that it's on you computer? technically it's also a license that grants you rights to modify it ... actually, the developers who wrote it are the ones that own it... or I am wrong?


Last edited by Koopacabras on 23 May 2021 at 11:45 pm UTC
Xaero_Vincent May 24, 2021
I probably wouldn't be interested in a subscription myself but if it could help compete against Microsoft Game Pass for PC, if priced similarly with an equal or greater selection of quality games.

It could help chip away at the Microsoft Store and keep it at bay on PC. Anything that can help fight the Microsoft app store is good in my mind simply because it's UWP and thus is incompatible with Wine/Proton, whereas other game launchers and store fronts are Win32 based and generally run.


Last edited by Xaero_Vincent on 24 May 2021 at 12:33 am UTC
Comandante Ñoñardo May 24, 2021
EA play is included for FREE in Xbox Game pass for PC.... Valve should do the same.
Xaero_Vincent May 24, 2021
Another question would be is, if a Steam Game Pass subscription were made, would Linux and macOS Steam users obtain access to different curated selection of games compared to Windows players or would Valve only choose games that support all three platforms? Linux and Mac users having the same games (some that may not work) wouldn't make much sense nor be fair, especially if the subscription pricing was the same.

Valve could only leverage Proton for Linux not macOS and kernel anti-cheat games would need to be excluded if they aren't native ports.

It seems like deciding on this in a fair manner could get complicated pretty fast.
slaapliedje May 24, 2021
No, and here's an example of why subscriptions suck.

Changing of license in the middle of it...

So in the wee hours of the morning, I'd woken up and couldn't go back to sleep, so figured I'd look around on Amazon Prime for a movie to watch. Landed upon Saturday the 14th (figured it was amazing to watch at 3am). It finished up, and all of a sudden said that it was going to load up the Highlander series. I was like 'well okay then, I didn't click on a single thing, it just said 'video would resume' and then started Highlander...

Well turns out it'd automatically started IMDBtv... with Ads... needless to say I was freaking PISSED! I didn't ask for this garbage. I had to stop watching it because every so often it'd force me to watch a 45s ad. No.. Just no. So I did end up starting to watch the Highlander movie...

Off topic, I have to say, why is it that they picked Sean Connery, who very much has a Scottish accent, to play a person from Spain, when they had Christopher Lambert play the Highlander, who couldn't do a Scottish accent to save his life...

Anyhow, I'm pissed that I subscribe to Amazon Prime Video, multiple channels on it (Starz, Showtime, HBO) yet they screw me and force me to watch IMDBtv with ads??? And there is no option to opt out of that either...

There are enough subscriptions out there, and most of them end up being garbage. I'd prefer to just outright purchase my games, and I've bought a LOT on Steam.
tuubi May 24, 2021
View PC info
  • Supporter
I'm not a fan. I have a feeling that subscription services—whether in the form of access to a library of content or monthly media bundles—lead to even less influence on the markets by the consumer. You end up paying for all kinds of stuff you'd rather not support, and niches are marginalized even further. Especially if these subscriptions replace more traditional market models, like they've largely done for music and films. (Not that those markets weren't broken already.)

I know my disinterest in media subscriptions of any sort (Netflix, Spotify, Humble Monthly etc.) is probably considered weird, but despite the obvious convenience, I don't think they're worth the downsides for us or the majority of artists and developers. These services are a goldmine for big retailers and publishers, obviously, and superficially they seem like a good deal, but I'm not sure that they're good for us in the long run.


Last edited by tuubi on 24 May 2021 at 9:14 am UTC
TheSHEEEP May 24, 2021
View PC info
  • Supporter Plus
My biggest fear with subscription services is that I'm not sure if it is actually viable for smaller developers.
It all depends on the contracts with the given platforms, obviously - but since those tend to be very hush-hush...
Unless leaked like Epic's, of course.
NoSt May 24, 2021
Personally I prefer the traditional model.
I think the subscription model may be attractive to new people to Steam or to people who want to play the newest and hottest AAA titles (given that the subscription includes them). Though, in case of people like me, who have a huge backlog (my Steam library has over 1000 games) and don't really care about the newest hit titles, it doesn't seem all that interesting.
For me Humble Choice is the best option. I get plenty of games every month and, if I don't like a game or I already own it, I can just send a gift link to one of my friends.
no_information_here May 24, 2021
Quoting: TheSHEEEPMy biggest fear with subscription services is that I'm not sure if it is actually viable for smaller developers.
Exactly. Ask smaller-name musicians how much money they make on spotify or other streaming services.

Streaming only benefits the platforms and the big names. Everyone else loses.
Klaus May 24, 2021
I'd roughly echo a common mindset here: Steam will probably need it but I'm not sold.

My only use cases for streaming are trying before buying (the refund model already allows that, but best would be proper demos) and playing AAA games without buying a desktop PC. Given that I anyway don't have the time for AAA anymore, and usually prefer shorter indie games or games without defined playtime like Warband, I'd probably end up not using it at all.

Also, I'm worried about time limits for game licenses. Right now we buy the license, so it cannot be revoked freely (though it may become worthless on the event that Steam shuts down), while with streaming the licenses will come and go. No interest to play a he without a guarantee that it will be available until I'm finished, or if I want to replay.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.