Every article tag can be clicked to get a list of all articles in that category. Every article tag also has an RSS feed! You can customize an RSS feed too!
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

With the Steamworks Virtual Conference: Steam Deck over, we now have quite a few details that have come out on what to expect from the Steam Deck, Proton, Linux, SteamOS 3 and more.

Soon we'll go over some of the main points in another article, but something interesting caught our attention in one of the Q&A sessions. A hot topic that has come up time and time again since Proton was revealed back in 2018, has been whether developers will just drop native support and always go with Proton (or however it has been phrased).

We've seen a lot of articles across the web on it, and plenty of users from both camps argue it to death. So what do Valve really think about it?

We now have an actual answer.

Read out from developers in the session by Valve's Kaci Aitchison, the question was: "Would you prefer a game to use Proton or to have native Linux support, what's the stance on that?", answering Valve developer Pierre-Loup Griffais said "We have no strong preference. Really, it comes down to whatever is the best experience. So if it's easier for the developer to get to a point where the best experience is achieved through Proton we think that's great. But if they have the know-how or the resources to work on a native Linux build, that has a great experience and has all the functionality and they're able to maintain it, we think that's even better."

You can listen back yourself on YouTube in the full event video, with the question around 3:02:35.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
54 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly came back to check on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. Find me on Mastodon.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
35 comments
Page: 1/4»
  Go to:

kit89 Nov 13, 2021
A very diplomatic answer, also a perfectly logical one, Valve is interested in games working, how as far as they are concerned is irrelevant.
d10sfan Nov 13, 2021
I think the answer makes sense. There's many native games that are worse experience than Proton. Nothing because of Linux, just a shoddy port.

In that case, I think it makes alot of sense for companies to use Proton unless they want to take the effort to ensure that a native port actually has all features and is not missing major features, like multiplayer, or being out of date constantly.

I'll always prefer native first when buying, but part of that will be does the port actually work and do everything needed. If not, I usually avoid the game.
StenPett Nov 13, 2021
Having worked on multiple (okay, two) games released first on Windows, and then on Linux, we saw that while using Proton/Wine was great for testing (it gave way better crash reports than what we got in Windows), performance was just about doubled on modest hardware when we made a Linux native build (up from around 25 FPS to over 40).
AussieEevee Nov 13, 2021
That's pretty much how I would have put it too. Native is best, but I would love it if developers without the resources to make a native build would just focus on Proton/WINE compatibility.
AussieEevee Nov 13, 2021
Quoting: d10sfanI think the answer makes sense. There's many native games that are worse experience than Proton. Nothing because of Linux, just a shoddy port.
To be entirely fair, there are a LOT of PC ports that perform way worse than their console counterparts, so this doesn't surprise me.
Julius Nov 13, 2021
If developers target Proton/Wine as a stable API instead of doing strange hacks that only work on specific versions of Windows, then it is better then custom (closed-source) native ports. The GNU/Linux ecosystem is too dynamic and focused on working with constantly maintained open-source software, for the typical close-source game port to work without problems longer then a few months. Sure you can try to work around that with more stable runtime environments like Steam does or package it in containers etc. but at that point you might as well run another compatibility shim like Proton.

What we really need it open-source engines for games, not closed source native ports.


Last edited by Julius on 17 November 2021 at 12:59 am UTC
kuhpunkt Nov 13, 2021
Quoting: GuestIt's quite a non-committal answer, the sort you get from politicians.

Judging from investment and effort, it very much looks like Valve prefer "Proton". Just easier for them, makes complete sense. Supposedly however the Deck isn't as closed up as consoles, so it shouldn't matter what Valve want - it should matter what the community wants, what developers want.

How is it non-committal? And how is Proton easier for Valve? The constantly have to update it and work on it to make new games working. Native games would be easier for them.
berarma Nov 13, 2021
Maybe Valve doesn't care but users should. Proton games come without support, that means the user doesn't have any rights regarding their purchase. In case of issues the developer can answer with "no Linux, play it on Windows" and they're right. Native games are supported, you're entitled to have the game working on Linux as the developer promised and they shouldn't do anything to prevent it.

To date, no Proton game is supported. What does Valve have to say about this?
kuhpunkt Nov 13, 2021
Quoting: berarmaMaybe Valve doesn't care but users should. Proton games come without support, that means the user doesn't have any rights regarding their purchase. In case of issues the developer can answer with "no Linux, play it on Windows" and they're right. Native games are supported, you're entitled to have the game working on Linux as the developer promised and they shouldn't do anything to prevent it.

To date, no Proton game is supported. What does Valve have to say about this?

I guess that's why Valve have the "verified" thing they are now working on.

If they verify it...
berarma Nov 13, 2021
Quoting: kuhpunkt
Quoting: berarmaMaybe Valve doesn't care but users should. Proton games come without support, that means the user doesn't have any rights regarding their purchase. In case of issues the developer can answer with "no Linux, play it on Windows" and they're right. Native games are supported, you're entitled to have the game working on Linux as the developer promised and they shouldn't do anything to prevent it.

To date, no Proton game is supported. What does Valve have to say about this?

I guess that's why Valve have the "verified" thing they are now working on.

If they verify it...

And we have to see what "verified" means. It doesn't sound like full support, just a very slight level of commitment. Will we have the same level of support than other users or is it on us? Can we get stuck on an old version of the game because the last version doesn't work and the developer doesn't care?

I hope it means a lot more than "we tested the game and it sorta works."
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.