We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

After the absolute disaster that was their original Runtime Fee announcement, Unity have now put up another apology and announced what the new plan is going forward.

Their new plan will keep Unity Personal free and there's no Runtime Fee for games made with it. The revenue cap there is also moving up to $200,000 and they're removing the requirement to show the Made with Unity splash screen. Additionally, no game earning less than $1 million in a 12 month period will be subject to the Runtime Fee.

For developers on Unity pro and Enterprise, the Runtime Fee will now only apply with the next LTS version of Unity shipping in 2024. So existing games and games with older Unity versions will not be included (unless developers choose to upgrade).

Unity said they will also "make sure that you can stay on the terms applicable for the version of Unity editor you are using – as long as you keep using that version", so they won't change the terms for existing users. Although, we've heard that before and they changed their mind as I noted in a previous article.

For games that are subject to their new Runtime Fee, they will offer a choice of either a 2.5% revenue share "or the calculated amount based on the number of new people engaging with your game each month" and those numbers will be self-reported by developers and they will "always" be billed the lesser amount.

They're also inviting developers to a live fireside chat hosted by Jason Weimann today at 8 PM UTC.

Pictured Credit - Unity

As for how Unity will calculate the Runtime Fee from the FAQ it states: "While we always recommend you supply your own data, in the absence of that, we will use our own data from Unity services that you have agreed to integrate into your project, and readily available external data." and they also confirmed the Unity Runtime does not phone home by default unless developers have hardware stats enabled.

The new plan that has a fresh policy page here is a lot better that's for sure but is it enough? Their original announcement and the anger it caused for developers has broken a lot of trust.

What are your thoughts?

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Game Dev, Misc, Unity
18 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
22 comments
Page: 1/3»
  Go to:

d10sfan Sep 22, 2023
Feels like any good will they had with the community is gone with their recent bad decisions. This is a decent walk-back, but requiring people to be online to use the editor is annoying.

I hope people continue to use open source solutions like Godot in the future
baconcow Sep 22, 2023
I've already switched to Godot and ported what I had there. It isn't much, but I don't plan on going back. Always online, for a development environment, is trash. Their top executives clear well over $100 million. Apparently, they are spending half a billion yearly on marketing. If they are bleeding profit and want ways to get back in the green, going after the developers profits should not be their first priority.
Highball Sep 22, 2023
I started with Godot a year ago. I saw the writing on the wall with Unity, which is why I chose to learn Godot. The recent debacle just cemented my decision from a year ago. I hope this will give the current Unity developers the off ramp they need and I hope they take it.
Tchey Sep 22, 2023
Unity changed the rules to make more money, and then rolled back (a little), but not because they actually care, only because of the hate toward them.

Very different, but same feel IMO, it’s just like the "greenwashing" from the big corpo. They don’t care at all, it’s just because it’s in tune with the times.
Philadelphus Sep 22, 2023
Hopefully this is a better deal for all the people with Unity games on the market or in advanced stages of completion. But I'd be surprised if we don't see a wave of people switching engines in future, and maybe even porting over their already-on-the-market games to new engines.
dwm Sep 22, 2023
I think the CEO has to be fired.

I don't say this lightly, but I think trust in the organisation has been badly breached, and unless and until the senior person responsible for this planned deception is fired, it's going to be difficult for the organisation to redeem itself.

I note from the most recent posting that it's not the CEO who is apologising, but one of their subordinates.
PublicNuisance Sep 22, 2023
Quoting: baconcowI've already switched to Godot and ported what I had there. It isn't much, but I don't plan on going back. Always online, for a development environment, is trash. Their top executives clear well over $100 million. Apparently, they are spending half a billion yearly on marketing. If they are bleeding profit and want ways to get back in the green, going after the developers profits should not be their first priority.

Quoting: HighballI started with Godot a year ago. I saw the writing on the wall with Unity, which is why I chose to learn Godot. The recent debacle just cemented my decision from a year ago. I hope this will give the current Unity developers the off ramp they need and I hope they take it.

Care to link to your games ? Always looking for more Linux games that use a FOSS engine.
ElectricPrism Sep 22, 2023
Always Online Editor?

Welcome to the future of digital hell on earth.

This is the world as it will be if we fail in our foss quest.

The Lord of the Bin
ElectricPrism Sep 22, 2023
To continue above ^^ Mudahar today covered 10 years of Xbox leaks. Its clear the global leaders are trying to get rid of Personal Computing and move gaming to "the cloud" where you can't own a copy, content can be censored, updated or removed and game preservation and emulators is a thing of the past.

I don't think these moves by Unity are missteps, they might as well come out and say they only want you to be able to Stream Their Editor since that seems to be the way things are going.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=z_XUBUc_uDQ
Kimyrielle Sep 22, 2023
So if you don't keep track of user installations, don't use any of their intrusive "services", and aren't publicly traded...they take an educated guess?

Also, what the heck is "initial engagement"? A term you come up with when you attended too many board meetings? Or had to much coffee?
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.