NVIDIA have released a blog post from chief security officer, fighting back against attempts from pundits and policymakers in governments wanting backdoors.
In the post, David Reber Jr. gives a firm no to the suggestion they should add in anything like a backdoor or killswitch into their hardware noting "NVIDIA GPUs do not and should not have kill switches and backdoors" noting that adding anything like it would be "a gift to hackers and hostile actors". Some words that perhaps the UK Government should take note on, with their repeated attempts (#1, #2 and so on) to get backdoors in encryption.
The post continues noting how a "good" secret backdoor just isn't a thing "only dangerous vulnerabilities that need to be eliminated" and ensuring that "no single-point vulnerability can compromise or shut down a system". It all seems so obvious to say doesn't it? But it clearly needs to be repeated as governments simply don't learn. A backdoor for one, is eventually a backdoor for everyone determined to access it.
Reber Jr goes on to give the NSA's Clipper Chip initiative from the 90s as an example of how it just doesn't work. There's more in the post worth reading but the ending note is especially blunt "There are no back doors in NVIDIA chips. No kill switches. No spyware. That's not how trustworthy systems are built — and never will be".
See more in the NVIDIA blog post.
In related NVIDIA news - there's a new recommended Linux driver out and they're working on some Linux gaming performance improvements.
Words in a statement do not equal actions and if they're forced to add a backdoor I'm sure nvd/amd would not disclose anything until they get caught.
Just have the mindset that all electronic devices are or can spy on you.... EZ

I can't imagine how complicated would be to add a part that must be 110% secure for everyone *BUT* for the self-appointed good guys.
I'm glad the largest company in the world takes this stand against abusive governments.
And if you think UK is bad on this, do you want a rant about US? No, you don't.
They wanna be our friend, yet their drivers are still closed-source.....That's a very good point. Making the source code open for public scrutiny would go a long way for building trust regarding these backdoors and other spying issues.
I see no justification for governments spying on their own citizens to that degree. It's reprehensible.
Logical Psychopathy, Madman strat with big balls just coming out and saying it putting the blame where it belongs, much respect.
They appear to have self-preservation.
They appear to understand that making their products a military proxy will lead to the destruction of their wealth and understand that would be not in their or their investors interests.
Now lets see how they do dismounting the tiger without becoming dinner.
What's apparent from the last few years, is that there has been a shakeup, and for some reason a ton of backdoors have been closed ( CUPS ). I'm guessing there is a new generation of backdoors that have already taken their place and that information will not be shared with non-"friends".
To me, this is sounding close to "We don't want to, trustworthy systems never will be built this way - but we have to."