Fedora Linux 43 has arrived for Fedora Workstation, Fedora KDE and other assorted flavours that use Fedora have also seen various upgrades.
There's a lot of the usual background upgrades bumping up the versions of various software included, but plenty of user-facing improvements too. Across different spins of Fedora, you should now see their newer Anaconda WebUI installer for example. GNOME in Fedora is also now Wayland-only coming in with GNOME 49 with all the goodies that gives you like a new video player, an improved GNOME Software app store and much more.
On the KDE side you get Plasma 6.4 which also has a whole lot new like per-workspace tiling options, accessibility upgrades, drawing tablet improvements and lots more.

Pictured - Fedora Linux KDE 43
One major background change is the swap over to RPM 6 for packages. This should be transparent to users, but comes with many benefits to security. And, starting with this release the installer will no longer support installing Fedora on disks that use Master Boot Record (MBR) while in UEFI boot mode on 32-bit x86 systems, it will instead enforce the use of the modern GUID Partition Table (GPT). This only affects new installs. Another seemingly small change, but one needed, is that the /boot partition has been bumped up to 2 GiB due to increasing sizes of everything like firmware, initramfs and more.
See more in the release notes. And various blog post announcements.
In case you missed it recently, we also had the news about Fedora officially allowing AI-assisted contributions. Which, going by all the comments and quotes on our Bluesky post, has not been received well at all.
THAT BEING SAID
Fedora Linux Project agrees to allow AI assisted contributions with a new policy
So you know...
...but after the ai update, I'll never consider it for anything ever again.
Given the amount of backlash they're seeing over it, I imagine they'll have changed tact by the time Fedora 44 comes out.
There was a point in time when I considered Fedora to be a great middle-ground distro between rolling releases and the slower stable releases, but after the ai update, I'll never consider it for anything ever again.
Don't worry, even with all the AI stuff, Fedora will still be more mature than CachyOS with its Zenity-based GUI tools. :-)
And Fedora Workstation (Silverblue) is 90% stock upstream GNOME (that does not allow AI based contributions) anyway. (Not sure about the KDE variant though, but I suppose it will be similar.)
Last edited by AsciiWolf on 28 Oct 2025 at 3:54 pm UTC
Why can't they create an AI spin and call it FedorAI?
Because puns make some people unreasonably angry, and they probably get enough death threats as is.
Wasn't always Fedora the testbed for everything new?
Is there any more suitable candidate to test AI-created code on Linux?
Am I the only who recalls the backlash when they were first to make Gnome 3 and wayland default?
(as for the AI part, posted my opinion in the other post as that was more relevant than here)
Glad that there are still people here. You are not bots right? Right?
And the KDE on this tiny machine (Intel Core i5-7500T + ntel HD Graphics 530) works amazing!
What they've done is basically acknowledging the fact that it's impossible to check whether their contributors are using AI or not in their developments. So they're doing the only reasonable thing about it : officially allowing people to use it.
And since most developers already use AI, whether it's simple auto-complete agents in IDEs or problem-solving agents, their decision has little impact whatsoever. They wouldn't have a way to enforce an anti-AI policy. It's not even a matter of pro VS anti AI debate.
And STILL people are freaking out about it. For like... no reason ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Glad that there are still people here. You are not bots right? Right?
...I can't legally answer that.
And STILL people are freaking out about it. For like... no reason ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
They should be freaking out because we shouldn’t be allowing it at all. Beyond the ethical and legal implications for an open source project, there’s also the outsized environmental impact of every single prompt because of the data centers required to host these LLMs. It’s not good.
Wasn't always Fedora the testbed for everything new?Not every new thing is the same.
It would be new to have the default desktop do a constant strobe effect at the best frequency for inducing seizures. And yet, new though the idea is, I suspect some would have quibbles about it. Some people just don't understand progress.
Last edited by Purple Library Guy on 28 Oct 2025 at 11:13 pm UTC
They should be freaking out because we shouldn’t be allowing it at all. Beyond the ethical and legal implications for an open source project, there’s also the outsized environmental impact of every single prompt because of the data centers required to host these LLMs. It’s not good.
Again, you (and the people freaking out) are missing the point : it's not a question of being pro or anti AI. AI is here, it's being used, and neither Fedora nor ANY project, open-source or not, have the means to enforce or forbid the use of AI from their contributors. Just like : if I build a chair, there's no way to know I used a saw of brand X or Y.
I mean, what would you have them do ? Requiring the installation of a spyware on the contributors' computers and manually review recorded videos to make sure the coder never used an AI ever ? Who would take the time to view those videos ? Who would spy on the coders ? What if the project has several contributors, or if the contributor used another person's work, like, for example, dependencies or external libraries ? How do you check that ?
Again, and finally. I'm not making a pro-AI speech, your concerns are perfectly valid. But your expectations are unrealistic and unfeasible.




How to setup OpenMW for modern Morrowind on Linux / SteamOS and Steam Deck
How to install Hollow Knight: Silksong mods on Linux, SteamOS and Steam Deck