Patreon Logo Support us on Patreon to keep GamingOnLinux alive. This ensures all of our main content remains free for everyone. Just good, fresh content! Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal Logo PayPal. You can also buy games using our partner links for GOG and Humble Store.
We use affiliate links to earn us some pennies. Learn more.

California law to require operating systems to check your age

By -
Last updated: 2 Mar 2026 at 12:12 pm UTC

The time of age assurance is upon us, and not just for social media - for operating systems too and that includes Linux as well of course.

News currently doing the rounds is California law AB-1043 "Age verification signals: software applications and online services" that comes into effect January 1, 2027 that will require operating systems and app stores to get your age and be able to somehow signal that age to applications when they request it.

From the bill:

This bill, beginning January 1, 2027, would require, among other things related to age verification with respect to software applications, an operating system provider, as defined, to provide an accessible interface at account setup that requires an account holder, as defined, to indicate the birth date, age, or both, of the user of that device for the purpose of providing a signal regarding the user’s age bracket to applications available in a covered application store and to provide a developer, as defined, who has requested a signal with respect to a particular user with a digital signal via a reasonably consistent real-time application programming interface regarding whether a user is in any of several age brackets, as prescribed. The bill would require a developer to request a signal with respect to a particular user from an operating system provider or a covered application store when the application is downloaded and launched.

This bill would prohibit an operating system provider or a covered application store from using data collected from a third party in an anticompetitive manner, as specified.

This bill would punish noncompliance with a civil penalty to be enforced by the Attorney General, as prescribed.

This bill would declare its provisions to be severable.

Reading through the bill details, it doesn't seem to demand any ID scanning or anything like that. The text makes it pretty clear they want "nonpersonally identifiable data" taken from your birth date to have you placed into age brackets like under 13, under 16 or at least 18.

This is very US / California specific of course but still applies worldwide to any operating system that has downloads available in California, and continues the trend we've seen elsewhere against social media platforms from various countries (like the unpopular changes with Discord). All in the name of protecting children. This in a way seems a lot more invasive though, considering this age checking is now making its way into your PC directly. It starts with asking for your birth date, but how long before they want more - and for other places to create similar laws? It's a slippery slope.

What we may end up seeing is the likes of GNOME, KDE Plasma and other deskop environments just add in a simple date picker for your age on account creation, or some kind of statement on their downloads page on how it's not to be used in California perhaps.

It would be interesting to see how this type of law could go after Linux distributions if they don't have any age checking at all in place, especially since accounts already created before July 2027 will need to have something in place so you can go back and add your age.

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
Tags: Misc
12 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly.
See more from me
All posts need to follow our rules. Please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Readers can also email us for any issues or concerns.
29 comments
Page: 1/2
  Go to:

doragasu 5 hours ago
User Avatar
It's again nonsense brought by people that does not understand technology. How can Archlinux or Gentoo guarantee that the age check exists if the user does not install the corresponding package? What about my router, will it have to verify my age before connecting WiFi? And what about my smart light bulb? Will it have to verify my age to turn on?
Szkodnix 5 hours ago
Ubuntu: California Edition when? 😁
pb 5 hours ago
User Avatar
What's next, CPU checking your age?

Last edited by pb on 2 Mar 2026 at 12:15 pm UTC
Chrisznix 5 hours ago
User Avatar
Somehow some folks manage to make every day a bit more dystopian than the next. You have put it out first that this will come, and here we are - faster than i expected. I have four children, and of course i want to protect them, and yes, i have to bickle about media usage every day with them. But this is not protecting kids - it's cocooning them. And absolutely hate that they use our kids as an excuse to deploy all this.
vic-bay 5 hours ago
1984 was a warning, not a tutorial.
pb 4 hours ago
User Avatar
Quoting: doragasuAnd what about my smart light bulb? Will it have to verify my age to turn on?
Your light bulb will stream the picture to the central server where AI will evaluate your age. If you're <18, The light will automatically turn off at 22:00 so you get a proper rest before school.
Haelikor 4 hours ago
User Avatar
I know MidnightBSD is entertaining a desktop ban on California starting 2027.

That'll be an entertaining precedent. lol
Drakker 4 hours ago
Great, now it will be super easy for scammers to target children. Imagine what the ad industry will do with this. Targeting toys and fast fashion ads to the most vulnerable (fews kids can ignore ads and they have yet to develop defense systems against ads). That's totally crazy.
jeisom 4 hours ago
What I find interesting is that it applies to any user base size, includes hobby OSes, and could even apply to a rescue disk OS if it allows downloads from say, flatpak for instance. I suppose the rescue OS could just disable internet or try to claim it is "enterprise software".
Jarmer 3 hours ago
User Avatar
from a technical standpoint this is a complete non-starter since there's about 50 ways it just simply is impossible to implement in the linux space. And by that I mean TRUE age detection with some kind of auth.

If all they're doing by this idiotic law is making a new checkbox that says "are you over 18?" then 🤣

Last edited by Jarmer on 2 Mar 2026 at 1:21 pm UTC
Cybolic 3 hours ago
User Avatar
Oh no... this is really going to delay the release of AmigaOS 3.3!
whizse 3 hours ago
User Avatar
Non-issue. Download and install Linux on your device, you automatically fall in the 30+ age bracket 😄
Ehvis 3 hours ago
User Avatar
  • Supporter Plus
Quoting: JarmerIf all they're doing by this idiotic law is making a new checkbox that says "are you over 18?" then 🤣
Even that would be a risk. It would signal to law makers that the idea works and that they just need to change the requirements for how age is checked.
Eocene84 3 hours ago
As someone who doesn't have kids (thank God) and never will, I'm really tired of being punished because other people can't or won't parent their children, which makes the government feel the need to step in. Hopefully the state I live in, Colorado, doesn't do something like this.

Last edited by Eocene84 on 2 Mar 2026 at 2:17 pm UTC
Klaas 2 hours ago
Quoting: Eocene84Hopefully the state I live in, Colorado, doesn't do something like this.
Too late. There are reports that they are doing the same thing.

https://www.pcmag.com/news/colorado-lawmakers-push-for-age-verification-at-the-operating-system-level
Lachu 2 hours ago
I hope they do not search for reason to made GNU illegal.
Serious_Table 2 hours ago
It's funny reading the comments to this because I wonder how many actually read through the article.

This is the compromise we could hope for; if they're going to keep demanding an age verification, having that verification instead ONLY on the host device instead of it being face or ID scanning, and that host device simply sending a signal to any requesting site, etc, that "this user is in this age bracket", that's about as secure as you could hope for while still meeting a requirement for an age check, especially if it remains as just a "enter your birthdate" text box at the setup of an OS. It keeps the onus of verification off the website providers, which means user account creation isn't required to verify age because it can just ask for the proper flag from your OS or app provider, and is better for privacy overall than what others are proposing.

The BEST for privacy, of course, would be to never have to ask for that information in any way, shape, or form, but it appears that bridge has already been burnt, so we're now just hunting for the best and most secure and privacy-enabling compromise without just streaming your damn face to every web page 24/7 while you're using it.
Lachu 2 hours ago
I am above 18, so I will tell: I have 120 years - no matter how old I am. Does telling your age should not be prohibited? Why Google, MS and other should known, how old you are?
CanadianBlueBeer 2 hours ago
User Avatar
proper comment is something about fornication and the equine transport
🤬

The lunatics are running the asylum.

(and yes, 1984 was not a "how to")
Cloversheen 2 hours ago
User Avatar
Quoting: Eocene84As someone who doesn't have kids (thank God) and never will, I'm really tired of being punished because other people can't or won't parent their children, which makes the government feel the need to step in. Hopefully the state I live in, Colorado, doesn't do something like this.
It's sadly not about protecting children.

It is simply a lazy and easy excuse because any criticism of the law will open you up to be marked as "dangerous to children" and thus socially destroy you. It has been used for all kinds of things going back hundreds of years. It is unfortunately quite effective on the species as a whole.

These laws also hurt small businesses and marginalized groups harder than large businesses and privileged groups, so it is unfortunately very apropos in the current political climate.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon Logo Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal Logo PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register