Give fascists the finger and a few bullets in Too Many F*cking Nazis

Perfect timing. The rightwing party of germany just claimed almost 20% in one of the lands...🤮

Yesterday, the French municipal elections also saw a historic breakthrough for the far-right party, which openly aligns on nazis and fascists roots, helped (as right before the WWII) by the traditional right wing that fears a true left elected.

Sadly, it smells like our generation could be "all out of bubblegums" in the next decade in this mad world!

Last edited by Geppeto35 on 23 Mar 2026 at 4:02 pm UTC

Quoting: ChrisznixPerfect timing. The rightwing party of germany just claimed almost 20% in one of the lands...🤮

Quoting: Geppeto35Yesterday, the French municipal elections also saw a historic breakthrough for the far-right party, which openly aligns on nazis and fascists roots, helped (as right before the WWII) by the traditional right wing that fears a true left elected.

Sadly, it smells like our generation could be "all out of bubblegums" in the next decade in this mad world!

Has anyone ever stopped to ask those voting this way WHY? I don't follow European politics closely so I could be wrong about this, but from what I can tell the major voting point is immigration and the downstream effects (like increased housing prices as one example).

Add to this, people calling them Nazis for wanting something different than you might want will only exclude them and dig them into their positions. If you are an open-borders proponent (or whatever the issue might be), you won't change any minds calling people names and telling them they are wrong/dumb.

Extremism is created when there is a lack of communication, and I see this divide worsening as people seemingly refuse to engage civilly with one another. Futher, I am hesitant to call anyone extremist when they simply have a diffent opinion. Is it really extremist to want to stop immigration and deport some of the current immigrants? Compared to rounding them up and shooting them - an actual extremist view? You might not want that, but is wanting that (the deporting, not executing) really extreme? If so, can I argue that importing them is at the other end of extreme? That is an honest question. FYI I don't think either position is truly extreme.

Quoting: eggrole

Quoting: ChrisznixPerfect timing. The rightwing party of germany just claimed almost 20% in one of the lands...🤮

Quoting: Geppeto35Yesterday, the French municipal elections also saw a historic breakthrough for the far-right party, which openly aligns on nazis and fascists roots, helped (as right before the WWII) by the traditional right wing that fears a true left elected.

Sadly, it smells like our generation could be "all out of bubblegums" in the next decade in this mad world!

Has anyone ever stopped to ask those voting this way WHY? I don't follow European politics closely so I could be wrong about this, but from what I can tell the major voting point is immigration and the downstream effects (like increased housing prices as one example).

Add to this, people calling them Nazis for wanting something different than you might want will only exclude them and dig them into their positions. If you are an open-borders proponent (or whatever the issue might be), you won't change any minds calling people names and telling them they are wrong/dumb.

Extremism is created when there is a lack of communication, and I see this divide worsening as people seemingly refuse to engage civilly with one another. Futher, I am hesitant to call anyone extremist when they simply have a diffent opinion. Is it really extremist to want to stop immigration and deport some of the current immigrants? Compared to rounding them up and shooting them - an actual extremist view? You might not want that, but is wanting that (the deporting, not executing) really extreme? If so, can I argue that importing them is at the other end of extreme? That is an honest question. FYI I don't think either position is truly extreme.

Alot of these people tend to be misled by the goverment though.. "it's not our fault your life is shitty, its that immigrants fault"

Take Brexit here in the UK for example. Everyone I know who voted to leave was due to immigration.

Yet under the EU we could send illegal immigrants to the EU country they entered from, then brexit happened

Subsequently, the small boat crisis wasn't a thing pre-brexit, but not seen a single brexiteer who will acknowledge this and instead beat their chests and still act like brexit was a good thing.

Critical thinking needs to be used more with right wing parties, instead of being so biased about their opinions all the time

Oh please, fuck victim blaming and shaming immigrants or apologizing to that shit. Bigotry and xenophobia are bullshit regardless of anything that's going on. It's not the fault of any of the immigrants that imperialism has destabilized and/or brutally exploited and oppressed their home countries, forcing them to leave. Which is something that the petty liberals (Blair, Obama, and Genocide Joe, etc.) are all equally guilty of as the assholes in the right (Bush, the Orange Moron, and the Tories, etc.).

Quoting: eggroleExtremism is created when there is a lack of communication

No it isn't. Different political camps never communicated much and probably never will. Extremism is created when the system as it is fails to meet the needs of large and increasing numbers of people, when lives become precarious and even those who are doing all right fear that this might not be a stable situation. At that point, people look for someone to blame, and there are two basic answers:

Answer 1: Blame the people in charge. This is the obvious answer since the people in charge are, well, in charge. If things are screwed up, who else would be responsible? But this gets more radical if people notice that the current situation, bad for them, is actually enriching the people at the top (as it is today). At that point you start to think they're not just getting things wrong, they're screwing you over deliberately.

Answer 2: Blame groups who have no power, but who seem different. Outgroups, aliens, people who trigger xenophobia. This is the stupid answer--like how are these scapegoats supposed to have caused any of the problems--but it is the answer that gets the propaganda funding, because the people in charge really want everyone who's upset to believe it's the fault of anyone but them. And when people are afraid and angry, blaming the outsider is a strong instinct, so it works pretty well. But it is simply wrong, not to mention evil.

(It's particularly wrong in today's world, where if there are a bunch of immigrants it is because the exact people siccing you on immigrants ruined the countries people are fleeing, whether by war or predatory trade practices or coups and destabilization. For instance, if the US and Europe hadn't deliberately broken Iraq, Libya and Syria, the mass immigration to Europe from those regions would not have happened. Anyone who doesn't want lots of immigration, the last thing they should do is vote for fascists, because they're always militarists who will create crises that cause immigration.

Quoting: eggroleFurther, I am hesitant to call anyone extremist when they simply have a diffent opinion. Is it really extremist to want to stop immigration and deport some of the current immigrants? Compared to rounding them up and shooting them - an actual extremist view? You might not want that, but is wanting that (the deporting, not executing) really extreme?

[sarcasm] Well, and is rounding them up and shooting them really extreme? Compared to torturing them slowly and then eating them - an actual extremist view? [/sarcasm]
You can always pretend (X) isn't extreme if you can find a vile enough (Y) to compare it to. What's not extreme is justice and equal rights for all.

Quoting: eggroleAdd to this, people calling them Nazis for wanting something different than you might want will only exclude them and dig them into their positions.

So like being transgender (nonbinary), these people want me imprisoned or dead for that reason alone. They think suicidal ideation among us is a big joke. They think because they are cis and I am not I should be a in prison for the rest of my life or a corpse. Yes, they are nazis this is what the nazis did. And of course, electing a guy who talks like a nazi because trans people exist does also make them at the very least complicit in nazism and accepting of it. Oh sure, debating someone else's right to life is just an opinion to you because it doesn't directly affect you. Given the rest of that comment I can already see the "is life in prison really that extreme, you're still alive" yes it is extremist. I should not be in prison for existing and using a goddamn bathroom.

Boy, oh boy...

Quoting: eggroleHas anyone ever stopped to ask those voting this way WHY? I don't follow European politics closely so I could be wrong about this, but from what I can tell the major voting point is immigration and the downstream effects (like increased housing prices as one example).

Increased housing prices don't happen because of immigration. It happens because of the de-regularisation of the housing market (Which it should never be a fucking market) and allowing the likes of Airbnb to take over or giving new builds to multi-millionaires en-mass to do money laundering and put directly into the rental market.

Add to this, people calling them Nazis for wanting something different than you might want will only exclude them and dig them into their positions. If you are an open-borders proponent (or whatever the issue might be), you won't change any minds calling people names and telling them they are wrong/dumb.

It is true that the words nazi/fascist are sometimes overused, diluting their real meaning. However, it is the right that started using it so they can deflect the conversation to that topic, instead of their policies and actions. When Musk did the nazi salute, he was very aware of this.

But let's not forget either; if it looks like nazi, behaves like a nazi, and says things a nazi would, it is definitely a fucking nazi.

Is it really extremist to want to stop immigration and deport some of the current immigrants?

1. Yes, it is.
2. Are they/you really against immigration and pro deporting, or do they only ask of this for people that aren't white and are economically worse than them/you? If the latter, they/you are racist and waging class war. Edit: Actually, if the former, also applies to being racist and waging class war nonetheless.
3. I'm going to assume you are a white person in the US, so you don't belong in that continent... Or this only applies to "now"?

If so, can I argue that importing them is at the other end of extreme?

No one is "importing" anyone. Please stop referring to people like if they were goods.

P.S: There's so much I'd like to say, but I don't have too much time right now, and I also promised myself to be more civil.

Last edited by Arehandoro on 24 Mar 2026 at 5:47 pm UTC

Quoting: ArehandoroBoy, oh boy...

Quoting: eggrole

Is it really extremist to want to stop immigration and deport some of the current immigrants?

1. Yes, it is.

If so, can I argue that importing them is at the other end of extreme?

No one is "importing" anyone. Please stop referring to people like they were goods.

P.S: There's so much I'd like to say, but I don't too much time right now, and I also promised myself to be more civil.

Arehandoro, it's "funny", I wanted to say exactly the same thing you said! Perfect.
Also the obligatory expected Purple Library Guy comment. ❤️
It's a good way/reminder to see that the majority of people here are not on the eggrole's side and I'm really happy about it.

I would kindly ask to stop promoting games with "killing nazis" tagline, that's not about actual nazis and more about killing political opponents that extreme left calls nazis. And all of the comments reflect exactly that. We had one such killing in recent times IRL of the man who werent a nazi, but was named as such by his political opponents. If there's a problem in a modern politics - it's this rhetoric. Also I think that this "game" is a lazy shitpost in gaming form and personally, I'm not interested in such content. This rule will also apply to any "sucking off Adolf simulator 5000" or "kill many communists", just in case.

Also I was under the impression that this site's position was somewhat apolitical. But those types of postings (this is second of such case in my memory) generate "political discussion" that I would consider faux pas and maybe even extreme. It's not nice in any way, shape or form.

Last edited by vox on 24 Mar 2026 at 4:29 pm UTC

Quoting: voxI would kindly ask to stop promoting games with "killing nazis" tagline

No.

Quoting: voxAlso I was under the impression that this site's position was somewhat apolitical.

You can't have read much from us over the years then. We've never been apolitical.

Quoting: voxI would kindly ask to stop promoting games with "killing nazis" tagline, that's not about actual nazis and more about killing political opponents that extreme left calls nazis.

I watched the trailer. Sure looked like the main character was killing a bunch of actual cartoony Nazis. But if you see your "side" in that . . . Ehhh, tough. Meanwhile, games where the enemies are Communists are so common it's not even really remarked on.

Quoting: voxAlso I was under the impression that this site's position was somewhat apolitical.

Far as I can tell, this site's position is an insistence on common decency. It just so happens that a lot of things the modern far right like to say violate that. That's on them. But I don't see what you have to complain about here except that commenters disagree with you. That isn't a site policy. People rubbishing nonsense is not a free speech violation, it's the other people also getting to speak.

Quoting: eggroleAdd to this, people calling them Nazis for wanting something different than you might want will only exclude them and dig them into their positions. […] Extremism is created when there is a lack of communication, and I see this divide worsening as people seemingly refuse to engage civilly with one another.

Other commenters already (civilly) pointed out issues with your comment, but I have to say I agree with this point A LOT.

Calling people names is the worse way to make them change their minds. The only thing you get out of it is validation from people who already agree with you anyway.

I'm in France, in my 20k-people city the far-right party got 20% of the votes, their main selling points were (in descending order of priority according to their website):
1. more police, more weapons, more cameras
2. more parking space for cars near the city center
3. less money for thing they don't like (mainly pointing out subsidized housing and immigration-related associations)

And the non-written selling point is that their leader is a 19-yo woman studying law, ie a young Marine Le Pen.

Now I disagree with all of these points, but is calling 1 out of 5 of my neighbors nazis or fascists going to change their minds in any way? Or should I go to them and ask “Okay, why do you want cameras in the street? When do you think it would have helped you? I don't like that kind of surveillance because it can be misused for X, plus example Y shows it isn't even effective in the case you just described, what do you think of solution Z instead?”?

---

Back to article's subject, I don't really like this kind of games, which I place into the name calling category. They're fun only if you already agree with the point they're trying to make* and won't change anyone's mind.

(*or are we reading too much into it, associating it with currently raising far-right ideas?)

Quoting: Purple Library GuyWhat's not extreme is justice and equal rights for all.

In our current, somewhat distopian times, it seems to me that the ideal of "justice and equal rights for all" IS an extreme viewpoint, verging on utopian in nature. Our society more accurately reflects a paraphrase of George Orwell's famous quote from Animal Farm: "... some are more equal than others." Our society definitely allows certain individuals to hold more power and privilege than others.

Quoting: George OrwellAll animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.

We are a hierarchical species. If you look back in history, this is how it has always been.

Quoting: voxYou can't have read much from us over the years then. We've never been apolitical.

Just remembered some closed comments in a discussions before. Oh well.

Quoting: Purple Library Guy

Quoting: eggroleExtremism is created when there is a lack of communication

No it isn't. Different political camps never communicated much and probably never will. Extremism is created when the system as it is fails to meet the needs of large and increasing numbers of people,

For the last 10 or so years people have been saying "hey, maybe all this immigration isn't a good idea." They have made points that one might agree or disagree with, but it was their position. And that entire time the governments and the opposing parties have said to them, resoundingly, "STFU, Nazi, Racist, Bigot!" (as also seen in some post in this very thread).

These were middle of the road people with concerns that have largely been proven true. Housing prices have increased not only because of reckless fiscal policies, but because there are literally more people competing for the same houses. Rape gangs in Europe (again I am not well versed) seem like they are far too common - and the demographics are clear. Public services are being spread thinner, again because (among possible other reasons) there are more people to service. This really is a basic supply-demand problem (again, among other problems). In the USA we are seeing investigation after investigation on fraud that is often done by migrants (though all fraud should be dealt with, this isn't a migrant issue really until you look at the demographics).

Even if you disagree with everything I said, your disagreement or namecalling doesn't make me believe otherwise. Hence, if I am wrong, instead of telling me I'm dumb, make a compelling argument as to why I'm wrong.

Now, you can't honestly tell me that the people you call extremists today weren't for 10 years trying to voice their opinions and now when they've finally reached a point where enough is enough they form a political block and say "well, you didn't want to hear our concerns or compromise, so we will simply vote our leaders in" everyone is acting surprised?

What's the old saying: if you make peaceful revolution impossible, you make violent revolution inevitable? Now, I know many of the people here see themselves as the underdog fighting the man, but remember that sword cuts both ways. There are plenty of people today that see the forced acceptance of your ideas as "the man", particularly when the governments of the world seem to enforce these views...

Quoting: Purple Library GuyI watched the trailer. Sure looked like the main character was killing a bunch of actual cartoony Nazis. But if you see your "side" in that . . . Ehhh, tough. Meanwhile, games where the enemies are Communists are so common it's not even really remarked on.

I was talking about the reactions of the commenters. Also I was thinking about previous post. No one in the comment section reacted to it as if it was a game about historical nazis. So that's not me seeing things or interpreting them. Also I don't really remember any game that's comparable and about killing communists anywhere. I don't know what you`re talking about, sorry.

Quoting: Purple Library GuyFar as I can tell, this site's position is an insistence on common decency. It just so happens that a lot of things the modern far right like to say violate that. That's on them. But I don't see what you have to complain about here except that commenters disagree with you. That isn't a site policy. People rubbishing nonsense is not a free speech violation, it's the other people also getting to speak.

So I would reiterate, that common decency (in my taste) is lacking with such postings. Then you blame the "modern far-right" for being in violation and then you talk about free speech as if I'm trying to shut anybody here. Just... what? Is this the case where we call out someone on being indecent to then do such indecency ourselves? I don't get your point at all.

Quoting: ArehandoroIncreased housing prices don't happen because of immigration. It happens because of the de-regularisation of the housing market (Which it should never be a fucking market)

I agree completely. The problem is that investors are being allowed to speculate on real estate. Housing/shelter should be a basic human right not a field for investment and speculation. There are other ways to handle real estate, but society and the rentier class are too deeply involved with the current system for change to happen. Particularly, since many of society's elite are members of the rentier class.

Quoting: ArehandoroNo one is "importing" anyone. Please stop referring to people like if they were goods.

"Import" is definitely the wrong word. It's hard to find the right word for this. "Immigration" refers to moving into a new country or region. "Emigration" refers to leaving one's country to move to another. Neither really apply to the act of encouraging immigration. "Deporting" means to exile or expel from a country or region. I guess the closest word we have for the opposite of that would be "admitting".

Quoting: eggroleFor the last 10 or so years people have been saying "hey, maybe all this immigration isn't a good idea." They have made points that one might agree or disagree with, but it was their position. And that entire time the governments and the opposing parties have said to them, resoundingly, "STFU, Nazi, Racist, Bigot!" (as also seen in some post in this very thread).

Which governments exactly?

Quoting: eggroleRape gangs in Europe (again I am not well versed) seem like they are far too common - and the demographics are clear.

Based on what statistics? I live (as a migrant) in a country (and a city) that's pretty heavy on migrants, especially Syrian and Afghan, have yet to see a "rape gang".

Quoting: eggroleIn the USA we are seeing investigation after investigation on fraud that is often done by migrants (though all fraud should be dealt with, this isn't a migrant issue really until you look at the demographics).

Um, you might wanna consider another look at your current political representation and the crimes on their hands. Also, raging about migrants while being a citizen of a country based on immigration is...just wow...

Quoting: eggroleNow, you can't honestly tell me that the people you call extremists today weren't for 10 years trying to voice their opinions and now when they've finally reached a point where enough is enough they form a political block and say "well, you didn't want to hear our concerns or compromise, so we will simply vote our leaders in" everyone is acting surprised?

What's the old saying: if you make peaceful revolution impossible, you make violent revolution inevitable? Now, I know many of the people here see themselves as the underdog fighting the man, but remember that sword cuts both ways. There are plenty of people today that see the forced acceptance of your ideas as "the man", particularly when the governments of the world seem to enforce these views...

Dude (i assume you're a dude, right?), please show me a single government that has enforced "forced acceptance", or where the more conservative to far-right were so completely singled out of the public debate as you're trying to portray. i'll wait.