While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:
Reward Tiers:
Patreon. Plain Donations:
PayPal.
This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!
You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Reward Tiers:
This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!
You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register
- Linux and open source getting age checking exemptions could be problematic
- Steam Deck stock returns but there's a big price increase
- Dusklight the reimplementation of The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess gets a major update
- Proton-CachyOS adds low latency layer and Discord rich presence support
- Flathub moves to ban nearly all apps and submissions made with generative AI
- > See more over 30 days here
- Shop Crush - Psychological Horror Thrift Sim with Literal Illusio…
- hollowlimb - Fully native alternative to ProtonDB
- PlayingOnLinuxphone - Feedback needed - future website updates
- Liam Squires-Hand - New Desktop Screenshot Thread
- Hamish - Restrict way kernel-level-anti-cheat is installed.
- PlayingOnLinuxphone - See more posts
Anticheat check - which competitive games actually work on Linux?
How to give Valve feedback when Proton games have issues on Linux / SteamOS
I am believing more and more each time that DRM is not fair (even in Europe it is not valid) however as I am moving towards GOG I have a feeling about their ports. Many of them are only a wine wrap. I don't feel like I am supporting linux developers through that (I mean, I could do that in a moment: just install wine and run a win game, and nobody contributed to linux).
Before it was advertised when it was only a wine port, now I don't see this information anymore in the gog website. Is it not possible to know now?
And also: What's your position about this? I ask because I think gog is better, but I don't want to buy such portings.
Thanks in advance
GOG's refund offer is enough to make me shop with them. Try getting a refund from Steam...
My feelings on the matter of wrappers is that if it brings yesterdays titles to Linux and they run well on reasonable hardware by today's standards then the only response (as far as I'm concerned) is "AWESOME!!!". With many of the "next gen" engines supporting Linux "out of the box" then these types of ports would certainly be unacceptable for newer games in the coming couple of years and I will certainly view them as "lazy".
I am a GOG employee and I wanted to tell you that we do state on the gamecards that a given game is "ported" via Wine, if that's actually the case. We also note whether a game comes as a 32-bit binary and we also note which packages are required in order to run said game with the proper package names given so that you can copy-paste them into your terminal and download them via your distro's package manager.
See FlatOut as an example: http://www.gog.com/game/flatout
The majority of Linux games on GOG are native.
As an exclusive GOG user I bid you welcome :-)