Every article tag can be clicked to get a list of all articles in that category. Every article tag also has an RSS feed! You can customize an RSS feed too!
We use affiliate links to earn us some pennies. Learn more.

Old School Rally gets hit with a DMCA and taken down from Steam

By -
Last updated: 18 Jul 2025 at 8:22 am UTC

Showing just how tough game dev can be for smaller teams and solo devs, Old School Rally has been hit with a DMCA and the Steam store page is gone. This is hopefully only a temporary situation, while the developer of the game works through the issue.

Writing in a Steam forum post the developer noted how they sourced certain car models from Sketchfab, a website where people can share and buy 3D models. The game developer said they spoke to the original uploader to verify approval for use in the game. All of that was agreed, so the game developer continued using the models and released the game with them. Unfortunately, a week ago the game developer received a claim of ownership over the car models from someone else. The original uploader of the car models maintained they own them, and the game developer reached out to the claimant to explore solutions. Sadly, "on Monday Old School Rally was abruptly issued with a DMCA takedown notice, prompting Steam to temporarily remove the game from the store as per their policies (which is standard practice)".

YouTube Thumbnail
YouTube videos require cookies, you must accept their cookies to view. View cookie preferences.
Accept Cookies & Show   Direct Link

So for now the game store page is just gone. The game developer is planning to update the game to lock the models and note they will return, as they're working on "all-original car model designs that still show resemblances to the classic legendary rally cars that we all love as replacements in waves".

What a sticky situation. Dev grabs models with the author's permission, and it turns out they might not actually own those models. Just goes to show how difficult it can be for game devs sourcing art from elsewhere. And, with the rise of AI generation, that might only get more troublesome.

Old School Rally

Official links:

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
9 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. You can also follow my personal adventures on Bluesky.
See more from me
All posts need to follow our rules. For users logged in: please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Guest readers can email us for any issues.
9 comments Subscribe

Pyretic 8 hours ago
This is why you don't source models from Sketchfab, especially for something like cars. Sometimes, people will just put stuff up there without any regards to licensing. Though, in this case, it seems that the original uploader changed their mind.

If anything, try opengameart.org, where yyhe content have a licence that clearly states what you can and can't do. At least, that way, you can't get sued or DMCA'd.
Liam Dawe 8 hours ago
User Avatar
Sketchfab is not unique in this, and the same could happen to any site, including opengameart.
LungDrago 7 hours ago
  • Supporter
Yeah, I am at a loss here. Copyright is incomprehensible to me. You ask for permission, you get it, have a license and then get taken down anyway?
elmapul 7 hours ago
well, at least it was not a car company saying "you cant use our car", while i understand their point, gaming is a different media, its not like someone was making their cars and they use this excuse to kill game preservation so screw then.
elmapul 7 hours ago
Yeah, I am at a loss here. Copyright is incomprehensible to me. You ask for permission, you get it, have a license and then get taken down anyway?

anyone can purchase something, reupload it claiming it was the original author to make a profit on thirdy party content.

If anything, try opengameart.org, where yyhe content have a licence that clearly states what you can and can't do. At least, that way, you can't get sued or DMCA'd.

that wont solve the issue as i said above, the probem is about figuring out who own the copyriht to an piece of media, any site need an contentID technology that, unless its perfect, wont catch all the cases of plagiarism.


i would say, even pirate sites need an contentID if they want to at least give proper credits to the original authors so those who want can support then.


Last edited by elmapul on 18 Jul 2025 at 9:10 am UTC
tmtvl 6 hours ago
User Avatar
Anyone wanna bet that both the modellers just happened to make almost exactly the same model because they just kinda ripped off existing cars?
Ehvis 6 hours ago
User Avatar
  • Supporter Plus
Yeah, I am at a loss here. Copyright is incomprehensible to me. You ask for permission, you get it, have a license and then get taken down anyway?

There are two problems here. First one is the DMCA, which is a stupid US law that puts the burden of proof solely on the user of a certain digital product. This opens it up for anybody to get something offline without having to proof anything themselves and stores like Steam have to do this. So this claim may still be false, but how the hell is a solo dev going to prove that?

The second problem is that unless there is an official registration of something or you actually made it yourself, it is hard to know who actually owns something. It's like that so called NFT "ownership" thing where the only actually prove that you own that number, but not the thing that it "points" to.
Mountain Man 2 hours ago
User Avatar
Using assets downloaded from the internet in a commercial project is always a bad idea. It's too hard to trace the provenance.
Kimyrielle 59 minutes ago
User Avatar
The law is really kinda weird. If I understand the case right, some random person on the internet claiming "It's mine and my proof is because I said so!" is enough to take down a game whose developer can prove that they bought the assets in good faith. It would be really nice if at least the claimant had to produce some actual proof that the assets are actually theirs, and their first addressee of complaint had to be the asset store which allegedly sold the assets without license. Not a person who did absolutely nothing wrong.

The number of cases of games using 3rd party assets ending in legal disaster like that is mind-numbing. I think many developers don't realize what a legal minefield 3rd party assets are. From that perspective, it's kinda easy to understand why some/many small projects switched to using AI rather than 3rd party assets. AI isn't without risk either, but it's nowhere -that- bad.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon Logo Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal Logo PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register