Found this in the bug report comments...

At this point, and I'm aware this isn't the forum for such conversations, I'd pin the blame on management guidance, not the dev team; the build works just fine on Desktop.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

With how big games are getting nowadays (I've seen 100+ GB), with 256 GB you'll run into storage limits real quick. I have a 512 GB Deck and I've had to do some juggling.

I just pimped my 64 GB model with an SD card.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

A "native Linux" label doesn't automatically mean fewer layers or better longevity. Unity's Linux export targets Vulkan/OpenGL and uses SDL2, but the core engine is proprietary.

Something seems to be missing here...
Unity's Windows support targets DirectX (I guess), which by Proton is translated to Vulkan/OpenGL. So yes, for Unity exports, which you seem to be talking about, native Linux does mean fewer layers.

Many of us still equate "native Linux" with fewer dependencies and better long-term stability. In reality, both paths are layered. The difference is who maintains those layers and how quickly fixes propagate when things break.

Who maintains the .exe format or the DirectX Interface? Ah...

We assume native equals independence.

Never heard that. I assume native support means native support.

Unity’s open-source dependencies are compiled and linked together with Unity’s proprietary engine code. Many issues can’t be fixed by the community. You'd need changes inside the closed Unity runtime or the game project itself.

It was possible for the Unity problem I'm actually aware of though, a strange interaction between a 10 year old Unity weakness and Steam using CEF in a certain way 10 years later.
(Good luck btw for getting a bug fixed for a Windows version of a ten years old game...)

https://ein-eike.de/2025/06/05/fix-for-old-unity-games-for-linux-not-starting-anymore/ [External Link]

So here’s the question: For closed-source commercial titles (not community-maintained OSS like 0 A.D.), what concrete benefits does a (proprietary) "native Linux" build deliver that outweigh Proton's faster fixes, wider hardware coverage, and transparent maintenance?

For the vast majority of my Linux native games, I don't need fixes, have never had a problem with hardware coverage and have the most transparent OS-to-OS translation layer possible: none. So, I don't see all the greatness you want to have outweighed in the first place.

What do you get by having a native version: Your system is supported, which seems to mean nothing for you, but much for me. And you are entitled to support by the developers. We lately had a case in the Steam forums again where somebody was told that the devs don't care that their game stopped working with Proton, they only care about Windows.

https://steamcommunity.com/app/221410/discussions/0/601915789280286287/ [External Link]

(Yes, there's bad support for Linux version as well sometimes. And for Windows versions used on Windows.)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

@Cyril, "not wanting to get bullied", tends to be a pretty solid reason to do something.

Not wanting to be bullied is a solid reason to do what the bullies want you to do?
Hm.
Will this make the person happy?
Will it make the person feel free?
Will it at least stop the bullying?
I'm my experience, they'll find something else.
Because bullying is not actually about what you're doing or wearing.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Non-collectible hats! :wub:

View this comment - View article - View full comments

like tabs on top, where one needs to use extensions or make manual modifications that often break on version update. Let's see which way this will go...

I got so much no idea why they've done this. I mean, the tab "heading" obviously has such a close relationship to the tab contents - and none to the search bar, the favorites, ...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

To be honest... This will come. It will be used. And it even will be practical, to some amount.

The question is how they're making you pay for it.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

If I remember correctly, some ten years ago it was speculated that Intel might buy Nvidia (to be able to fully compete with AMD who had CPUs and GPUs already). Things can turn around...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

But the approach towards the official Linux support from the shot callers was dismissive on the grounds of the low number of customers.

I totally understand that. Not every company has got the bags of money Valve seems to have.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

We used to have a time when Windows users complained about Linux ports

...but why? I don't understand the logic behind this.

(To be more precise than above: They didn't complain about their quality, but about their very existence.)

Don't ask me. :D
Wanting to be the only one (being supported)?
Fearing it takes away resources?
Having tried Linux, not having been able to cope with it, and now hating it? (I saw some trolls which seem to have this story.)

What baffles me more is the next though:

Nowadays, this job has been taken by Linux users.

(For the records: They mostly don't complain about their quality, but about their very existence.)

View this comment - View article - View full comments