Quoting: Guest

Quoting: Eike

Quoting: hardpenguinYes, this is good. Gotta get rid of the AI generated images (it is difficult to call it art).

It's obvious that this will not happen, right?

I do understand - and share - such feelings, but in the end, it's like trying to get rid of photos in the early stages of photography because they're "not art".

no sorry it's not like that... sometimes (not always tho) AI just takes some art and slightly morphs it.

Did you actually try image making AI? I gave it an attempt, and while of course I don't know all the art out there, I'm confident this wasn't just something slightly morphed.

*edit* I'm just too easy to distract sometimes. :D "They're not art" in my comment obviously points to "photos".

In the end, it doesn't matter if you consider AI work art or copying or something in between. Neither did it matter if you called photography a mere copy of a moment in reality eons ago. It's a way to produce something that's sometimes nice to look at and sometimes not (which is also true for photos and drawings), and which will be used.

What I would hope for is that people get to know if something is AI generated.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: hardpenguinYes, this is good. Gotta get rid of the AI generated images (it is difficult to call it art).

It's obvious that this will not happen, right?

I do understand - and share - such feelings, but in the end, it's like trying to get rid of photos in the early stages of photography because they're "not art".

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Klaas

Quoting: EikeBut I'm already a fan!?!

But do you make a high-pitched whining sound?

*lol *

My daughter (6 yo) is great at that!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: NodThere are three common schools of thought:

Well, thanks for trying to be neutral, I guess. :D

... but I'd remove everything about "religous".

My stance for school 3: They just want to play games and don't care how they are running, but that they are running. They don't want to restrain themselves to some 10 to 20% of the Steam catalogue, mostly indies, that are running natively.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: RavenWingsJust what my Steam Deck needs: Another fan :wink:

But I'm already a fan!?!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: slaapliedje

Quoting: Purple Library GuyGames that aren't open source are normal, and there are various reasons that isn't likely to change unless our whole economic system changes. Game engines that aren't open source . . . I kind of hope gradually become eclipsed by ones that are. But emulator things for making old games work that aren't open source are . . . problematic IMO. Especially when there's just one guy doing it. He loses interest or gets hit by a bus and then it just quietly rots because nobody can ever update it again, and so much for preserving the game. Not a basket I'd want to be putting my eggs in.

Amusingly, even if something is open source, if someone doesn't maintain the code, it'll stop working. Xkobo is an example, the C source is out there, but modern gcc doesn't like it too much. It's still built for NetBSD 9.0 though!

Yes, but if anybody is interested enough, they can take over.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

By the way, I saw a libSDL3 in my Steam directories lately. What is that about? Are they using an early development version?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: fabertaweI've set my scaling to 1.1 (1440p monitor), just enough to make reading "discussions" legible for these old eyes. Desperately needed!

Similar here, i couldn't stand the original new scaling, but I'm all fine with 1.2. :-D

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: apocalyptechBah.

I know a lot of folks really like the new update, but for me it was the final straw which made me abandon the beta branch and try to avoid it for awhile. I know they've said they put a lot of work into making it fast/smooth/whatever, but it just *feels* dog-slow to me. Visible little flickers when a menu activates. Little rendering delays when a window closes so there's a black area visible on the main window until the client catches up. It's just so infuriating.

This!

Quoting: apocalyptechI hate how every app nowadays is just some Electron-or-whatever webapp, and optimizing that kind of thing properly is nearly impossible. I really miss native widgets.

This, too!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Mountain Man

Quoting: Purple Library Guy

Quoting: Mountain Man

Quoting: Purple Library GuyDepends what you mean. In the sense that it's a bug rather than a feature, sure. Or, in the sense that it's not "intended", OK.
In the sense that a "feature of X" is something that inevitably goes with it . . . yeah, it's a feature of capitalism.

That's like saying that traffic accidents are a "feature" of automobiles.

They are. Introducing the automobile is introducing the traffic accident.

You apparently define the term "feature" so broadly that literally anything can be considered a feature.

According to my understanding, "feature" can be understood in two ways: as a property/trait of something, or in the dichotomy bug vs. feature, as an intended trait.

In all of our history, car traffic has come with accidents. Of course, this is not intended.

View this comment - View article - View full comments