Quoting: scaineDisolver Group.

I was thinking Divester Group.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Linux_RocksUgh, I forgot that IBM owns Red Hat now. Even more of a reason to never touch Fedora ever again... :sick:

Hey, could be a lot worse. Could be Oracle.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Poke your eyes out?
. . . Just how close were you planning to get?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I'll switch when Mint does; I'm vaguely hoping that will be soon, but I haven't had any problems with X11.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

That's hilarious.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Some people might be OK with carrying vehicles across maps, but I expect my vehicles to carry me.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I dunno, it's not very much . . . only A Handful of Missions. Be nice if there were A Few Missions More.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

they do not forget easily.

OK, but maybe they forgive?
. . . No?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

It seems like a stupid idea. I won't say it can't work, maybe it can. But what I'm getting is "From the makers of the game store nobody likes, a new game store you can't access at all unless you're already playing another game!"

I guess people who already play Fortnite might use it--for them, it's convenient. And there are quite a few of those people. And, that might keep them in the Fortnite universe for longer. Just that could probably be considered a success at Epic's real core mission of keeping Fortnite going as a huge phenomenon one year at a time. But it doesn't seem to me that likely it would become a success on a broader level than that, or that likely that it will pull more people into Fortnite just to use it as a game store.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

But is there a Majestic Carrot?

View this comment - View article - View full comments