Support us on Patreon
PayPalLatest Comments by Purple Library Guy
Rewrite the past in Airships: Conquer the Skies with the new replay feature
7 Dec 2017 at 4:45 pm UTC
7 Dec 2017 at 4:45 pm UTC
That is a fairly unique feature. It's a long time since I've seen someone come up with a game capability that's genuinely new to me. A pretty cool one, at that.
Open source game engine 'OpenMW' for Morrowind has been updated
6 Dec 2017 at 11:02 pm UTC
6 Dec 2017 at 11:02 pm UTC
the AI will now resurface from water to breatheAIs need to breathe?! ;)
Stellaris is getting a 'Humanoids Species Pack' DLC this month, plus huge patch news
6 Dec 2017 at 10:59 pm UTC
6 Dec 2017 at 10:59 pm UTC
I like the upcoming patch because it's named after one of my favourite science fiction writers (although to be honest you have to sort of pick and choose Cherryh's stuff; her best is incredible, her not-so-best is kinda mediocre, and her worst sucks). But the Chanur series and a few others put C.J. Cherryh forever in my pantheon of amazing.
Here's another way to look at the Linux market share on Steam
6 Dec 2017 at 7:46 pm UTC Likes: 2
6 Dec 2017 at 7:46 pm UTC Likes: 2
Quoting: KuduzkehpanAnd what does any of that have to do with China? It's capitalist through and through. It just happens to be capitalist and overtly authoritarian, unlike us who are capitalist and covertly authoritarian. Not a great choice but I wouldn't say they were better. The best thing you can say about China is that at least they're committed to building infrastructure; hardly a whole different system.Quoting: Duncfreedom of what ? freedom of to live as the capitalists describes what is living heh ? Lolz. i prefer more logical describitions as in communism. no religions no radicals no money no mercanarys.Quoting: AlveKattHowever, remember the whole "Firewall of China" thing? An OS that gives full control to the user might be heavily frowned upon by the rulers in China. People have been put in jail for less over there.That's actually a really good point that I hadn't considered. We all love Linux because of the freedom. The Chinese authorities are likely to hate it for exactly the same reason.
Here's another way to look at the Linux market share on Steam
5 Dec 2017 at 6:25 pm UTC
5 Dec 2017 at 6:25 pm UTC
Quoting: etonbearsI probably find it even more disturbing to see the same sort of blanket influence/group-think behaviour where it crops up in the financial world. It is a root cause of the mass stupidity that gave us Tulip Mania, the South Seas Bubble, Collateralized Debt Obligations ( the result of which we are all still feeling ) and now looks like we will get it again with Bitcoin and other crypto-currencies...Don't look now, but Collateralized Debt Obligations are back. I think they gave them a different acronym, but I read an article a while ago saying the same basic schtick is quietly making a sizable comeback. Gotta do something with all that Quantitative Easing cash.
Here's another way to look at the Linux market share on Steam
5 Dec 2017 at 6:21 pm UTC Likes: 1
On the first question, I suspect it would unless it was a really big discount. Valve gets, what, 30%? Sure, some purchasers would just play the games they have on their PC anyway, only in front of a TV instead. But the main market they'd be going after isn't like that. I'm a pretty low spender and over a few years I've dropped a few hundred on games. It adds up. I'm sure they could do fine selling $100 or $200 below cost--they'd want to do a bit of market research on how much console users spend on games to get it right. They might not initially make much money doing that, maybe even take a loss in the first year or so, but I don't think cashflow is a huge problem for Valve. They'd make money in the medium term and improve their strategic position.
At the same time, I question whether increasing prices would make much difference. People in a broad sense have a budget for games; they buy when they can afford them. If I'm willing to blow around $200 in a year on games, it doesn't matter much to Valve whether it's 4 games for $50 or 8 games for $25. If they bump their percentage, sales will decline (and developers will find it a less attractive platform). They'd be better off pricing the boxes on the assumption of the game price structure staying the same.
5 Dec 2017 at 6:21 pm UTC Likes: 1
Quoting: KetilI wonder about that. The question is, first, would the money Valve made from game sales to Steam Machine buyers pay for the discount on them, and second, would jacking the prices up make any difference?Quoting: MohandevirConsole pc should be targeted to console users and the typical console user doesn't care about upgradability that much. This Dell and Zotac nailed it but the price tag... Ouch! Way too expensive. This is why I have the feeling that Valve is in a much better position to offer a cheaper solution partnering with AMD and, if it is not enough, sell it under cost. Afterall they already got the games catalog to absord the loss. PC gaming, as a whole, would benefit from a successfull Steam Machine campaign.The money from selling under cost has to come from somewhere. For consoles it comes from the pricier games. If valve did the same with steam machines, then I am afraid the price of all steam games would increase, which would be bad for everyone except Valve.
On the first question, I suspect it would unless it was a really big discount. Valve gets, what, 30%? Sure, some purchasers would just play the games they have on their PC anyway, only in front of a TV instead. But the main market they'd be going after isn't like that. I'm a pretty low spender and over a few years I've dropped a few hundred on games. It adds up. I'm sure they could do fine selling $100 or $200 below cost--they'd want to do a bit of market research on how much console users spend on games to get it right. They might not initially make much money doing that, maybe even take a loss in the first year or so, but I don't think cashflow is a huge problem for Valve. They'd make money in the medium term and improve their strategic position.
At the same time, I question whether increasing prices would make much difference. People in a broad sense have a budget for games; they buy when they can afford them. If I'm willing to blow around $200 in a year on games, it doesn't matter much to Valve whether it's 4 games for $50 or 8 games for $25. If they bump their percentage, sales will decline (and developers will find it a less attractive platform). They'd be better off pricing the boxes on the assumption of the game price structure staying the same.
Here's another way to look at the Linux market share on Steam
4 Dec 2017 at 11:40 pm UTC
4 Dec 2017 at 11:40 pm UTC
It weirds me out that with the thousands of games around, many of them really good, the statistics can be pulled around so much by one or two top-selling games. Clearly everyone's buying the top game because everyone else is buying the top game, not because it's one they will intrinsically find fun. The mindset unsettles me.
Here's another way to look at the Linux market share on Steam
4 Dec 2017 at 11:16 pm UTC Likes: 1
This is something of a misconception. Governments do, it's true, do plenty of atrocities 'on their own hook' for reasons of state. But an awful lot of government atrocities are committed on behalf of corporations. So for instance, much of the impetus for WW I on the British, German and French sides at least was about cornering markets for their respective industrialists and financiers. Most of the impetus for colonialism was commercial; India was conquered largely for the benefit of the British East India company, the genocide in the Belgian Congo was an almost entirely private matter (the CEO happened to be a king, but the Belgian state had nothing to do with it) and so on. In Latin America, coups were fomented, dictators installed, thousands massacred and disappeared, mainly for the benefit of outfits such as the United Fruit Company. Nowadays the big players backing the wars tend to be oil companies, mining companies, military contractors (Halliburton anyone?)
Corporations play a huge role in the impetus for most wars and atrocities, and have for as long as they've existed.
4 Dec 2017 at 11:16 pm UTC Likes: 1
Quoting: Boogiepop_PhantomProbably off-topic, so put it under spoiler.
Spoiler, click me
but how did you come to such conclusion?I am actually live in one of aforementioned countries, and I doubt they will bring any kind of freedom to the world.
Power of corporations is a grim alternative to power of dictators.No, just no. All the most horrible atrocities were commit by states, governments. Look at 20th century and even now. Corporations are little children compared to them. Plus I never had this resentment against corporations to begin with. I would take Microsoft over Putin any day.
Spoiler, click me
This is something of a misconception. Governments do, it's true, do plenty of atrocities 'on their own hook' for reasons of state. But an awful lot of government atrocities are committed on behalf of corporations. So for instance, much of the impetus for WW I on the British, German and French sides at least was about cornering markets for their respective industrialists and financiers. Most of the impetus for colonialism was commercial; India was conquered largely for the benefit of the British East India company, the genocide in the Belgian Congo was an almost entirely private matter (the CEO happened to be a king, but the Belgian state had nothing to do with it) and so on. In Latin America, coups were fomented, dictators installed, thousands massacred and disappeared, mainly for the benefit of outfits such as the United Fruit Company. Nowadays the big players backing the wars tend to be oil companies, mining companies, military contractors (Halliburton anyone?)
Corporations play a huge role in the impetus for most wars and atrocities, and have for as long as they've existed.
Linux market share on Steam drops again as Steam continues to grow
4 Dec 2017 at 7:37 pm UTC
It's still not good. And I suspect that the Chinese will be among the last to start using Linux unless there's some kind of concerted government action to change things. So to some extent these percentages probably represent a new normal; when the Chinese influx stabilizes a bit we'll have the new floor from which to measure future growth (which will tend to be, for a while at least, happening in places other than China).
4 Dec 2017 at 7:37 pm UTC
Quoting: subSorry, but I don't see the point always mentioning that the absolute number of Linux Steam users "still" grows. It sounds like saying "It's not that bad".Presumably what counts for developers is who buys games. So for instance, if there are patterns observable in different locales, like English speakers having more dough to buy games with or Chinese (simplified) users tending to be fanboys of a single game and not buy that much else, developers would be fools not to look past the raw numbers of individuals on Steam.
It is that bad - the fraction of Linux users is far below 1 %.
And THAT is ALL that counts to developers (unless they are Linux fans).
It's still not good. And I suspect that the Chinese will be among the last to start using Linux unless there's some kind of concerted government action to change things. So to some extent these percentages probably represent a new normal; when the Chinese influx stabilizes a bit we'll have the new floor from which to measure future growth (which will tend to be, for a while at least, happening in places other than China).
Cutthroat is an amusing 2D party game involving stealth shenanigans
30 Nov 2017 at 6:56 pm UTC
30 Nov 2017 at 6:56 pm UTC
Where's Killer Waldo?
- CachyOS founder explains why they didn't join the new Open Gaming Collective (OGC)
- The original FINAL FANTASY VII is getting a new refreshed edition
- GPD release their own statement on the confusion with Bazzite Linux support [updated]
- Proton Experimental updated to fix the EA app again on SteamOS / Linux
- Stop Destroying Videogames initiative to get a public hearing organised by the European Parliament
- > See more over 30 days here
How to setup OpenMW for modern Morrowind on Linux / SteamOS and Steam Deck
How to install Hollow Knight: Silksong mods on Linux, SteamOS and Steam Deck- I need help making SWTOR work on Linux without the default Steam …
- WheatMcGrass - Browsers
- Jarmer - New Desktop Screenshot Thread
- Hamish - Is it possible to have 2 Steam instances (different accounts) at …
- whizse - Will you buy the new Steam Machine?
- DoctorJunglist - See more posts