Quoting: liamdaweA similar issue I saw in another game, if you re-name the Steam API file and put it where it wants it, it should launch. Should be easy for the dev to fix.

Heh, hello over here as well! Yeah, in this case it's some files that are flat-out missing, though fortunately you can find 'em in the original Snakebird instal folder. I agree that it'll be simple enough for a dev to fix, and anyone with the original Snakebird (or possibly also any other Mono-based game) would have the files on-hand to fix right away anyway.

Unfortunately I'm also having some other graphical corruption issues right after finishing the first level:

https://steamcommunity.com/app/1014140/discussions/0/1797403972733936587/ [External Link]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IltAqxsIXCw [External Link]

Much as I don't mind having an easier Snakebird to play through, just that first little tutorial level itself is unlikely to hold my interest. :) I have faith it'll get fixed.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Ooh, I am thrilled!

Having some difficulty launching the app, though: https://steamcommunity.com/app/1014140/discussions/0/1797403972733719945/ [External Link] - I assume that'll get sorted eventually. Anyone have any ideas about that?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed fringilla felis I love DRM free games! sed blandit sagittis. Sed eget urna nec felis mollis blandit ac auctor ex.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Welp, there goes the weekend, I guess.

Looking forward to this! Wonder if we'll see a sale tomorrow...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Huh! I hadn't realized that Quake 4 never got opensourced - I'd just sort of assumed that somewhere down the line it had been. That's a shame! I'm one of the folks who actually quite liked Quake 4, and I'd actually been thinking about giving it another spin soon. Looks like this article should give me some help with that!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Sure, if crossplatform multiplayer is a requirement for anyone, Civ 6 would be difficult to recommend in its current state. For those of us only interested in singleplayer, though, I've been extremely happy with it. I've put in ~120 hours on Civ 6 so far, nearly all of which during the time that Windows folks had the Fall 2017 update, and I've been having a great time regardless. Sure, it's a shame that Civ 6 patches take awhile in general to make it to our platform, but I'd personally have no trouble recommending it to someone (again, so long as crossplatform multiplayer isn't a requirement).

Let's all keep in mind that Aspyr's also got to play with the hand they've been dealt. The very fact that crossplatform multiplayer appears to be so hard may speak to the overall challenge of getting this codebase ported. How much of their previous porting work can be automatically merged, and how much requires manual tweaking? How far ahead of the patch did Aspyr even have the code to start the porting process? Since we can only guess at basically all the factors here, I'm inclined to give Aspyr the benefit of the doubt, given their pretty great history with other ports.

Quoting: 14Because of the Humble deal right now, I'm fairly tempted to grab this game. But lack of cross-platform neuters it. I think I'd be better off getting Civ V even though it's getting on the old side.

Civ 5 remains quite fun, of course, and if I'm being honest, I'm one of the folks who would say that Civ 5 in its current state is a better game than Civ 6 in its current state. As others have pointed out, modern Civ games tend to only really hit their stride after a major expansion or two. But yeah, I'm sure you wouldn't regret a Civ 5 purchase. It's still awesome!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: TetsI'll wait. The "system requirements" section on the store page still have "Additional Notes: You must install GLIB 2.28 in order to run JavaFX Media."

Yeah, I'm pretty sure they literally just copy+pasted the requirements from the first game in the series, which happen to be completely incorrect since it's a totally different engine. Still doesn't reflect very well on their commitment (or non-commitment) to supporting Linux, of course. I'd been waiting to hear how this new one worked before buying it. The port for the first one was just super awful, like nearly unplayably awful.

Still, I'm happy to hear that the new one may be doing much better, even if they don't know how to put up requirements properly!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I've been going on a little adventure game binge, spurred by my recent Full Throttle purchase (which I'd never actually played before). Which led me to finish up my Day of the Tentacle Remastered runthrough which I'd been letting languish for awhile, and then started up Zork 1 again 'cause the mood hit me. Huzzah for nonsensical puzzles!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Thanks for the notice on this one; right up my alley, and it is certainly quite enjoyable. A nice mix of mechanics which do start to get nicely complicated as time goes on.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: GuestWindward drops you in the game with zero explanation about who you are and what the goal is, it’s almost the same for Steamworld Heist (they tried to explain things in long cutscenes but I can’t say it helped much)

I've been having a fabulous time with SteamWorld Heist, actually - I can't believe it took me this long to stumble across it. I agree that the plot is pretty bare bones, but I think all the dialogue and stuff between missions provides enough context to serve as the glue between the actual missions. And the atmosphere is quite pleasant, at least if you're not tired of steampunk stuff. Anyway, I'd personally give it a pretty glowing recommendation. Scratches my X-COM itch better than X-COM does, actually.

View this comment - View article - View full comments