View video on youtube.com

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: PangachatIt seems that AMD isn't supported again...
Nice one, refund, refund, not buy (Dying Light, SoM, CoH2)
Linux gaming is really cheap :D

If you keep refunding and not buying AMD unsupported games you might collect enough money to buy an Nvidia card.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Guest

Quoting: dubigrasuI've no idea what is wrong with his system/setup but his Linux results seem always suspiciously low, like was the case with the recent Xonotic benchmark.

He uses powersave cpu governor (at least on SoM and DiRT benchmarks)...

You're right, and even according to his own earlier tests that's not a good option for games.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=intel_pstate_linux315&num=3 [External Link]
At the same time the intel_pstate powersave governor is (if I'm not mistaken) the default governor and Michael always is using defaults in its benchmarks.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: ChrispWhere can I commit a bug report?

Watch https://github.com/virtual-programming [External Link]
Sooner or later a Dirt Showdown section will appear (or you can initiate one);

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Guest

Quoting: GuestJust to clarify: the issues with AMD cards are not the fault of the drivers. For whatever reason (time, experience of people involved, etc), Shadow of Mordor is just a shitty port. Like it or not, it is the fault of Feral.

I would have to agree with mirv, just look at Windows vs Linux benchmarks.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=mordor-win10-linux&num=2 [External Link]

Those result are representative only for Michael's system, not for Linux in general.
I've no idea what is wrong with his system/setup but his Linux results seem always suspiciously low, like was the case with the recent Xonotic benchmark.

I have older and inferior hardware than his and yet I get much better results:
View video on youtube.com


View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: mmstickI tried Witcher 2 on Linux one month ago and it still runs significantly worse than running the Windows copy through Wine with Gallium Nine. Indeed, I would very much prefer that non-native ports are abolished henceforth and never allowed onto Steam. Non-native ports are not the way, nor will they ever be. Fixing a bug in a native port is easy, but resolving a bug in a non-native port? I don't think so. Either do a port correctly the first time or don't do a port at all. No port is better than a bad port.

Can you define what "significantly worse" means in numbers?
Because I want to compare them with my numbers:
View video on youtube.com

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: mmstickIf we wanted to play non-native ports then we'd just use Wine with Gallium Nine, without all these silly bugs. Even that dreaded Witcher 2 port runs better in Wine that it does the 'non-native Linux port' from this developer.

That used to be true when Witcher2 was released, but is no longer the case.
As it is now the Linux port is very close to the native Windows release in terms of performance.
But the main difference is that the VP port is instantly available to Linux gamers in general being distributed and supported by Steam/GOG, while there are less people gaming through Wine and even less with Gallium nine.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: ElectricPrismI think this comment relates to a recent benchmark on Phoronix about OpenGL Benchmarks [External Link].

I specifically wanted to hilight Xonotic performance on Ubuntu as doing terrible.

Well, I don't know what is it with Michael's setup/hardware or whatever he is doing, but he is consistently getting low Linux results in his tests.
The Shadow of Mordor benchmark is a good example where I get much better results with my older hardware than his, but this Xonotic benchmark really takes the cake.
His Xonotic results are simply ridiculous, no way Xonotic should work so bad with his hardware.
With my hardware I get these results on SteamOS:

View video on youtube.com

View this comment - View article - View full comments

OK, thanks.
Your TITAN is a nice beast, I have the same CPU but an older GTX 780 (can't believe that I said older) and I get only 45 average FPS on Ultra.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: N30N

Quoting: liamdaweNote: This shows my 970 performing better than the 980 Ti and Titan X tested over at Phoronix, so his benchmark is very odd.

My Titan X (driver v352.30) running at 1920x1200 on Ultra settings, with the HD Content, gets the following results.
Average FPS: 79.59
Max FPS: 115.81
Min FPS: 44.91

What CPU do you have?

View this comment - View article - View full comments