It seemed to me that a lot of John Carmack's shift in attitude toward Linux was him being pressured to toe the company line after Zenimax acquired Id.  Zenimax had no interest in Linux or in releasing older game engines as open source.  I'm not saying that Carmack lied or thought that Linux was commercially profitable for the company.  I just don't think that his interest in open source and Linux was all about profitability before Zenimax came into the picture.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

This looks pretty interesting.  I would really hate it if they introduced micro-transactions, though.  I'd ten times rather pay a monthly fee than deal with micro-transactions.  They are one of the quickest ways to douse my interest in a game.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

This does look pretty good.  I may buy this after I get through a couple of games in my queue.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Quote from MALWhy not focus the effort by adding some of this content into SuperTuxKart instead?

This game is offered for sale, while SuperTuxKart is open source.  This game is modeled after 16 bit games, especially SNES mode 7 games, while SuperTuxKart is a polygon based game more like the 32/64 bit kart games that came later.  Besides them both being kart games, there's not that much similarity between the two projects.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

If you understand where the term came from, you can see why it's ended up being used the way it has.  Back in the 1980's the competing systems were the IBM PC (& compatibles), the Apple Macintosh, the Commodore Amiga, and the Atari ST.  While talking about the systems and which of them software was available for, people would shorten the names to PC, Mac, Amiga, and ST.  Of course after a while there were no Amigas or STs.  Then it was PC vs. Mac.

However, the original shortened terms were talking about different pieces of hardware, not different operating systems.  These days Windows and Linux both run on 'IBM PC compatibles,' and even Macs could arguably be referred to as 'PC compatibles.'  Therefore, even knowing where the term came from and acknowledging that a 'PC' could be a reference to an IBM PC compatible system, it's no longer appropriate to use the term because we're now talking about different operating systems running on compatible hardware, not different hardware systems.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Quote from HamishJust to throw my own molotov into the flames, I have been using radeon cards on Linux since I made the switch full time to Fedora in 2007, and my old Radeon 9200 was one of the best graphics cards I have ever used. Even then it worked out of the box with free in-kernel drivers that required no fuss to use and setup, something that I had come to expect from Linux. Unfortunately that was one of the last cards out of ATI that had free drivers supported by the company, something that used to be the norm before the likes of Matrox and 3DFX went down the toilet and Nvidia started pushing everyone to use non-native blob drivers that did not work with the Linux graphics stack and instead crudely welded their own proprietary implementations on top of a free well integrated system.

Thankfully AMD bought out ATI later that year, and with the help of Linux vendors such as Novell and Red Hat started their own open source initiative. From there with the help of Intel they helped to further the development of the actual Linux graphics stack that had long since been suffering from atrophy due to a lack of proper commercial support. During the past five years the situation has improved dramatically, and I can now love my Radeon HD 4670 just as much as I did my Radeon 9200. There is still more work that needs to be done, and it is still getting done at an amazingly fast rate, but to credit Nvidia as being a beacon on Linux is to ignore the fact that through their actions they actually helped cripple the Linux graphics stack for almost half a decade.

I actually have some similar experiences.

I had a laptop with a Radeon from that era (I'm not sure of the exact model), and it always worked great with the open source drivers.  In fact, I had that laptop for a while, then bought a new one (which happened to have an NVidia GPU) which worked OK for a little over a year, then I had to send it back for motherboard replacement under a recall. After this it worked for a little over another year, at which point the motherboard promptly went again (great recall).  So I went back to the old laptop which still worked great with Linux and Windows (well, as great as anything worked with Windows).  I was saddened when the motherboard on that laptop finally gave up the ghost.  I think it was about six years old by that time, and had been used a tremendous amount (I think I may have logged more time on that laptop than any other laptop I've had).  (Incidentally, I recently acquired a somewhat old laptop with a broken screen, and I resurrected the 1680x1050 display from that laptop to replace it with since the broken screen was also 15.4 inch.  It has a Mobility Radeon 2600, which works well with the latest open source drivers.)

About four years ago I bought a laptop with an AMD 4850 GPU.  It didn't work very well for games with the open source drivers when I got it, so I ran Catalyst.  I had to put up with the quirks and workarounds for full motion video while I used that.  Not too long ago, however, I decided to update from Ubuntu Studio 12.04 to 13.10 and go back to the open source drivers.  With all the recent work on those drivers the laptop now works much better generally than it ever worked with the Catalyst drivers, and games still work reasonably well.  I've been contemplating getting a laptop that is a bit lighter and with an IPS display (I now have an IPS monitor for my desktop, and I'm spoiled).  However, I hate to give up on my old laptop while it's working so well, even if it is heavy and the battery only lasts two or three hours.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Quote from CheesenesGravity Badgers, ho!

The significance this remark didn't hit me until I watched the trailer.  When I did, I immediately understood the reference. :)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Reminds me of polygon games on the Atari Jaguar back in the day (which I actually thought were pretty good games at the time).  I guess the frame rate is a bit smoother.  It could be decent.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I think that a little of the contentiousness in this thread could have been avoided just by making points a little clearer.

...Linux isn't getting you as much value for money for your hardware.

This comment was made very specifically about video cards.  It's true that Linux gives you more value for your hardware when it comes to CPUs, RAM, hard drives, etc. (just about anything besides video cards, as long as it's compatible hardware).  It's even true that some video cards that are quite a bit older get better support in Linux than they do in Windows.

However, it's still generally true that video card driver performance in Linux trails that of Windows.

With NVidia's latest proprietary drivers you will see the best comparative performance (sometimes Linux beating out Windows, though that may be because of the Linux advantage with the other parts of the system).  They won't always work with every other part of the system exactly as expected, and have sometimes had stability problems.  The issues are generally minor, however, and they give you the best game performance along with perfectly acceptable desktop performance most of the time.

The open source drivers for Nvidia are probably hardly worth mentioning in a discussion on a gaming forum.  I respect all of the reverse engineering work that has been done on Nouveau, but the developers have been at a tremendous disadvantage (at least up until very recently).

With Intel video, the Linux performance is good, but not quite as good as the Windows Intel drivers.  The Windows and Linux drivers are developed entirely separately at Intel, so who knows what the future may hold.

AMD's proprietary Catalyst drivers are much better than they used to be, but that's not saying much.  They are pretty good for a lot of games, but have problems with others.  They pretty much stink for anything not involving OpenGL.  You get poor performance and tearing on your desktop.  You have to set media players to use OpenGL for output and set OpenGL to sync with the monitor in order to avoid tearing when playing videos.  This doesn't help you with Flash videos or anything being played directly by your browser.  You can try using a compositor outputting your entire desktop to OpenGL to alleviate this issue, but Compton, for instance, doesn't seem to be stable with Catalyst drivers.

AMD's open source drivers have also improved greatly.  In fact, I would go as far as saying that the open source drivers are very good ... as long as your card is at least two or three years old.  The biggest problem with the AMD open source drivers is how much they lag the hardware.  They have, however, continued to improve steadily ever since AMD acquired ATI.

AMD has recently made statements to the effect that we should expect a lot of progress in the performance of their hardware with Linux.  The recent flurry of activity with the open source driver has lead some to speculate that this is where the improvement they are referring to will arrive.  It's difficult to be sure, though, whether their efforts are going to be especially focused on the open source driver or not.  If that is what happens, they might eventually drop the Catalyst for Linux driver altogether, but we still don't know one way or the other.

One other issue that involves all of the open source drivers is that the open source OpenGL stack in Linux has trailed behind the OpenGL spec (I should clarify that the native OpenGL stack in Windows is much more behind the spec, but all the drivers in Windows are proprietary and use their own OpenGL stacks).  That means that the newest versions and features of OpenGL are not supported by open source drivers at this time.  A lot of recent effort has gone toward remedying this situation, so it is improving steadily.  It really seems to me that Valve's efforts, the resurrection of the independent game developer market, and the growth of desktop Linux in general have all helped with this.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

My memories of Chip's Challenge are of the Atari Lynx version, but it was a good puzzle game.

Of course when I want to relive my Atari Lynx memories I fire up the Lynx emulator on my OpenPandora, but a new game is a good idea.

View this comment - View article - View full comments