Support us on Patreon
PayPalLatest Comments by Colombo
Aspyr Media have delayed the Civilization VI 'Fall 2017' update until sometime after the 'holiday break'
29 Dec 2017 at 12:30 am UTC
29 Dec 2017 at 12:30 am UTC
If you write comments, then they are part of code.
Its the same as leaving variable name after everything else was changed and thus the variable name no longer correspond with its function.
Its the same as leaving variable name after everything else was changed and thus the variable name no longer correspond with its function.
Aspyr Media have delayed the Civilization VI 'Fall 2017' update until sometime after the 'holiday break'
24 Dec 2017 at 5:45 am UTC
For an example, see here:
http://apdevblog.com/comments-in-code/ [External Link]
24 Dec 2017 at 5:45 am UTC
Colombo, you already rebuked this approach with your earlier comment:I was merely stating how this trend began.
For an example, see here:
http://apdevblog.com/comments-in-code/ [External Link]
Aspyr Media have delayed the Civilization VI 'Fall 2017' update until sometime after the 'holiday break'
24 Dec 2017 at 2:34 am UTC
24 Dec 2017 at 2:34 am UTC
It just... there is this book called Clean Code. It became influential because it had good advices. And guy there says if the code is good, it doesn't need comments and that comments are sign of bad code that isn't readable.
And a lot of people adopted this approach.
And a lot of people adopted this approach.
Aspyr Media have delayed the Civilization VI 'Fall 2017' update until sometime after the 'holiday break'
23 Dec 2017 at 7:45 pm UTC
23 Dec 2017 at 7:45 pm UTC
Often, what is important is not comment what function does. You can see it if the code is well written. More important is to know why the code does a certain thing.
Open source game engine 'OpenMW' for Morrowind has been updated
11 Dec 2017 at 9:10 am UTC
Problem was mostly in design philosophy.
There are basically two branches of design, as seen by people. One is fun roller-coaster, construct system in a way to allow player be constantly challenged.
The other is basically pre-created world.
First can feel a bit artificial and when you screw the balance, it is BAD.
Second can have a lot of boring places, some people don't like when they play the game "incorrectly", become too strong and then complain that they don't have any challenge and game is too easy. This approach is problematic especially when game is very linear. Different builds can have different strengths and without way to get some extra XP, player can become stranded, unable to defeat next encounter, but having a no way to get his character stronger.
Morrowind is the later approach, Oblivion and Skyrim the former. So like Gothic, Morrowind has a plenty of characters premade and put into locations by hand. Characters are generally not levelled dungeons and so on. Still, there are random encounters (in outside as well as in dungeons). Those are leveled. But each creature and each location have some level range. Some creatures will not spawn if you are far away from their level. Some will level you only in their level range, i.e.:
range 8-13. Which means that if you are below 8, monster would be in level 8 (if it spawns at all) and if you are above 13, monster will be on level 13 (if it spawns at all, again).
However generally, unlike Oblivion and Skyrim, Morrowind was "broken" by design. Level didn't mean a lot and Morrowind provided PLENTY of powerful ways (magical items, potions, training and powerful armours and weapons if you know where to find them) how to deal with enemies.
Oblivion on the other hand was broken by balance. The used system is not significantly different than Morrowind. Problem was that they tried to make it more important and provide the roll-coaster feeling for players, but they screwed balance and monsters leveled with player all the time. In addition, their power usually (unless you played super-efficient) grew more quickly than player. Which made game actually easier if you didn't level at all. In addition, all equip was autoleveled as well. This means even the almost-unique armours like ebony, daedric and glass were quite common, glass in particular, as light armour, was present on every single random bandit. Oblivion removed a lot of freedom and "exploits" from Morrowind, so it wasn't that easy to combat those overleveled monsters.
They realized it and in Skyrim, they got rid of most of their system completely. Skyrim got rid of all the useless stats and instead put there perks, which can work better for specialization and creation of interesting characters. Unfortunately, they botched it again my making plenty of perks boring. The autolevel was also much better, leveling weapons and armour as well. However, leveling monsters was done in a bit boring way (not that anyone else figured how to make it better), their AI is usually poor and thus monsters have to rise in both HP and DMG. Which makes them bullet sponges. This makes every character slowly approach the master class: archer assassin. Which through sneak attack and hiding back can deal with those bullet sponges. Still, if you don't try to play it on legendary, its fine. Especially if you have immortal followers who can soak some attacks. Or you are summoner.
11 Dec 2017 at 9:10 am UTC
Quoting: slaapliedjeOblivion and newer they added auto-scaling of creatures. So you can go anywhere at the beginning will still have lower level enemies.That is not true, not true at all. Autoscaling was there since maybe Arena, for sure from Dagerfall.
Problem was mostly in design philosophy.
There are basically two branches of design, as seen by people. One is fun roller-coaster, construct system in a way to allow player be constantly challenged.
The other is basically pre-created world.
First can feel a bit artificial and when you screw the balance, it is BAD.
Second can have a lot of boring places, some people don't like when they play the game "incorrectly", become too strong and then complain that they don't have any challenge and game is too easy. This approach is problematic especially when game is very linear. Different builds can have different strengths and without way to get some extra XP, player can become stranded, unable to defeat next encounter, but having a no way to get his character stronger.
Morrowind is the later approach, Oblivion and Skyrim the former. So like Gothic, Morrowind has a plenty of characters premade and put into locations by hand. Characters are generally not levelled dungeons and so on. Still, there are random encounters (in outside as well as in dungeons). Those are leveled. But each creature and each location have some level range. Some creatures will not spawn if you are far away from their level. Some will level you only in their level range, i.e.:
range 8-13. Which means that if you are below 8, monster would be in level 8 (if it spawns at all) and if you are above 13, monster will be on level 13 (if it spawns at all, again).
However generally, unlike Oblivion and Skyrim, Morrowind was "broken" by design. Level didn't mean a lot and Morrowind provided PLENTY of powerful ways (magical items, potions, training and powerful armours and weapons if you know where to find them) how to deal with enemies.
Oblivion on the other hand was broken by balance. The used system is not significantly different than Morrowind. Problem was that they tried to make it more important and provide the roll-coaster feeling for players, but they screwed balance and monsters leveled with player all the time. In addition, their power usually (unless you played super-efficient) grew more quickly than player. Which made game actually easier if you didn't level at all. In addition, all equip was autoleveled as well. This means even the almost-unique armours like ebony, daedric and glass were quite common, glass in particular, as light armour, was present on every single random bandit. Oblivion removed a lot of freedom and "exploits" from Morrowind, so it wasn't that easy to combat those overleveled monsters.
They realized it and in Skyrim, they got rid of most of their system completely. Skyrim got rid of all the useless stats and instead put there perks, which can work better for specialization and creation of interesting characters. Unfortunately, they botched it again my making plenty of perks boring. The autolevel was also much better, leveling weapons and armour as well. However, leveling monsters was done in a bit boring way (not that anyone else figured how to make it better), their AI is usually poor and thus monsters have to rise in both HP and DMG. Which makes them bullet sponges. This makes every character slowly approach the master class: archer assassin. Which through sneak attack and hiding back can deal with those bullet sponges. Still, if you don't try to play it on legendary, its fine. Especially if you have immortal followers who can soak some attacks. Or you are summoner.
Steam now has a form of platform-specific wishlisting, to help developers see demand
7 Dec 2017 at 10:34 pm UTC
7 Dec 2017 at 10:34 pm UTC
What about this:
Preferred system setting:
1. If not set, estimate from the most common platform AND/OR from setting in store.
2. If set, THIS system is the preferred system.
-- This enable to have auto-detection of this setting, but it can still be overruled by user preference.
Wishlist:
1. Wishlist works like shopping list. Therefore direct unfiltered connection to non-wanted platforms is bad.
2. So either create more structured wishlist or special button.
3. In either case, special buttons/settings needs to be available. "I wish this was for my platform". Other stats can be also present as well, like "I wish this had DLCs, I wish this had sequels, I wish this had multiplayer, I wish this was in X sale". If small, but informative number of cases are present (providing options from which people decide is quite complex thing and many questionaries fail to make it limited and comprehensive at the same time), devs could have a powerful tool to find potential buyer.
This however needs structured wishlist that would enabled greying-out games that don't follow current conditions.
So what we have? Two powerful stats.
1. How many players have your game but don't play it because it is not on their preferred platform?
2. How many players play this game, but have different preferred platform?
3. How many players wish for this game, but only if it was cheaper (i.e., waiting for sale, number of customers that wished game to be cheaper vs number of customers that bought that game when it was cheaper could be an interesting stat).
4. How many players wish for this game, but need feature X/platform.
Preferred system setting:
1. If not set, estimate from the most common platform AND/OR from setting in store.
2. If set, THIS system is the preferred system.
-- This enable to have auto-detection of this setting, but it can still be overruled by user preference.
Wishlist:
1. Wishlist works like shopping list. Therefore direct unfiltered connection to non-wanted platforms is bad.
2. So either create more structured wishlist or special button.
3. In either case, special buttons/settings needs to be available. "I wish this was for my platform". Other stats can be also present as well, like "I wish this had DLCs, I wish this had sequels, I wish this had multiplayer, I wish this was in X sale". If small, but informative number of cases are present (providing options from which people decide is quite complex thing and many questionaries fail to make it limited and comprehensive at the same time), devs could have a powerful tool to find potential buyer.
This however needs structured wishlist that would enabled greying-out games that don't follow current conditions.
So what we have? Two powerful stats.
1. How many players have your game but don't play it because it is not on their preferred platform?
2. How many players play this game, but have different preferred platform?
3. How many players wish for this game, but only if it was cheaper (i.e., waiting for sale, number of customers that wished game to be cheaper vs number of customers that bought that game when it was cheaper could be an interesting stat).
4. How many players wish for this game, but need feature X/platform.
Steam now has a form of platform-specific wishlisting, to help developers see demand
7 Dec 2017 at 1:14 am UTC
7 Dec 2017 at 1:14 am UTC
Someone who developed this function couldn't think 5 minutes ahead.
Dominions 5 - Warriors of the Faith, the latest deep 4x turn based strategy game is now out
1 Dec 2017 at 6:11 am UTC
But the "no diplomacy" ai kind of resemble the shit you get in multiplayer, when everyone breaks the non-aggresion-pact and gangbang on you because you are ur and thats free land.
1 Dec 2017 at 6:11 am UTC
There is no AI diplomacyTechnically, AI recognize war and sometimes it will declare war against you.
But the "no diplomacy" ai kind of resemble the shit you get in multiplayer, when everyone breaks the non-aggresion-pact and gangbang on you because you are ur and thats free land.
Dominions 5 - Warriors of the Faith, the latest deep 4x turn based strategy game is now out
1 Dec 2017 at 12:18 am UTC
http://www.illwinter.com/dom4/startoptions.pdf [External Link]
1 Dec 2017 at 12:18 am UTC
Quoting: razing32Just read the manual:Quoting: soulsourceWould one care to share said command ? :)Quoting: razing32Dominions 4 always got stuck for me when the AI did its turn.That's likely a deadlock in the multithreaded AI. One can disable that feature with a command lime switch.
I poke a bit at Dominions 3 since it works and seems to have more nations to play.
http://www.illwinter.com/dom4/startoptions.pdf [External Link]
--multiai X
Create up to X processes for AI computations
(0=off). This switch only works on Linux and
Mac. It cannot be used in Windows.
Dominions 5 - Warriors of the Faith, the latest deep 4x turn based strategy game is now out
30 Nov 2017 at 10:03 pm UTC Likes: 2
1. New bless system significantly change game. You don't have just 2 bless effects per parth, you have 7 bless effects per path and you can point-buy those that you want, greatly personalize and specialize your bless.
This together with pretender getting bless effect in their dominion, some strong bless effects working only if your pretender is alive and new (minor) banish change, which now get part of the path effects is HUGE change that significantly change gameplay and adds load of new possible builds.
2. The new combat system, which is now "realtime" instead of "turn-based" in the sense that both sides act at the same time (each unit based on initiative) and not one side and after that second side... this greatly change how turns are played, remove annoying positioning which decided who will get first attack... supposedly boost cavalry (which is good, because it was a bit weaker). This connected with other combat changes (rebalance of weapon length, rebalance of critical hits, rebalance of fatigue) changes how troops fight and push it from meta "hire those who have longest weapon". Also, there is significant buff to archers, where bows benefit from increased strength. So giant archers are now better, because the gold that you pay for the giant chassis will now reflect its greater DMG.
3. New fort and recruitment system also changes dynamics. Suddenly, you don't need to build fort at once, but you first build palisade and then add another level. As you need, cheaper and safer. But a lot of mages that were earlier recruitable without fort take longer to recruit, while fort-only commanders are much easier to recruit.
4. New movement system. Now you can move more than one province at once. Even in enemy territory. Raiding with cavalry or fast units is now much easier. This is significant change in dynamics.
30 Nov 2017 at 10:03 pm UTC Likes: 2
Quoting: TheSHEEEPIt is a great game, no doubt.This is just crazy talk. Dom4 and Dom5 have HUGE changes.
However, as an owner of Dom3, Dom4 and CoE4 (Conquest of Elysium), I feel kinda ripped off here.
Dom5 is more of a slightly expanded Dom4 with not-too-many changes. And such a price for that seems way out of line.
Especially considering they haven't touched the series' biggest shortcomings - no AI diplomacy making single player almost entirely useless and the UI is still just terrible.
I think they should offer owners of the previous games some deal as other developers have.
If you're new to the series, though, the price should actually be worth it.
1. New bless system significantly change game. You don't have just 2 bless effects per parth, you have 7 bless effects per path and you can point-buy those that you want, greatly personalize and specialize your bless.
This together with pretender getting bless effect in their dominion, some strong bless effects working only if your pretender is alive and new (minor) banish change, which now get part of the path effects is HUGE change that significantly change gameplay and adds load of new possible builds.
2. The new combat system, which is now "realtime" instead of "turn-based" in the sense that both sides act at the same time (each unit based on initiative) and not one side and after that second side... this greatly change how turns are played, remove annoying positioning which decided who will get first attack... supposedly boost cavalry (which is good, because it was a bit weaker). This connected with other combat changes (rebalance of weapon length, rebalance of critical hits, rebalance of fatigue) changes how troops fight and push it from meta "hire those who have longest weapon". Also, there is significant buff to archers, where bows benefit from increased strength. So giant archers are now better, because the gold that you pay for the giant chassis will now reflect its greater DMG.
3. New fort and recruitment system also changes dynamics. Suddenly, you don't need to build fort at once, but you first build palisade and then add another level. As you need, cheaper and safer. But a lot of mages that were earlier recruitable without fort take longer to recruit, while fort-only commanders are much easier to recruit.
4. New movement system. Now you can move more than one province at once. Even in enemy territory. Raiding with cavalry or fast units is now much easier. This is significant change in dynamics.
- The "video game preservation service" Myrient is shutting down in March
- Discord delay global rollout of age verification to improve transparency and add more options
- Firefox 148.0 arrives with AI controls
- FINAL FANTASY VII arrives on GOG with a new edition live on Steam too
- SpaghettiKart the Mario Kart 64 fan-made PC port gets a big upgrade
- > See more over 30 days here
How to setup OpenMW for modern Morrowind on Linux / SteamOS and Steam Deck
How to install Hollow Knight: Silksong mods on Linux, SteamOS and Steam Deck- steam overlay performance monitor - issues
- Xpander - Nacon under financial troubles... no new WRC game (?)
- Xpander - Establishing root of ownership for Steam account
- Nonjuffo - Total Noob general questions about gaming and squeezing every oun…
- GustyGhost - Looking for Linux MMORPG sandbox players (Open Source–friendly …
- Jarmer - See more posts