I'm liking this article, but I don't like this article.

So, so sick fed up of AI. I work in cyber security and it's an absolute car crash there too. Accidents waiting to happen.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

automating tasks while allowing employees to focus on creative activities and complex problem-solving

...like finding a new job.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

If there already is a native port, it is always better to fix that port (if possible/feasible) instead of just nuking it and relying on the Windows version running using Proton.

I want to agree, but this is pretty idealistic, tbh. The original dev team must have had some Linux experience, because I remember enjoying this game when it became available for Linux, despite the microphone issue that was never, ever fixed. Or wasn't during the two years or so I played.

But now? Do the new modding team have the same familiarity with Linux? Will their plans for extending the game use tooling and third party libraries that run flawlessly in Linux?

I'm sceptical.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I despise Denuvo and their anti-consumer culture. Everything they stand for basically screams, "you, the consumer and purchaser of this product, are criminal scum and not to be be trusted".

So this is very on point for them. Great strategic alignment really.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Considering AI code generation is generally only possible because OpenAI scraped the entirety of every public repo in existence, it's pretty much impossible to guarantee that any given code it produces complies with any given license.

In much the same way that authors revile AI for only being possible by scraping pirated copies of their work.

:sick:

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Pfff. Dude, I'm RIGHT HERE. <sob>

View this comment - View article - View full comments

AI will become a tool like Photoshop or a calculator.

I suspect a lot of what you're saying has the potential to be true. But the reason people quite reasonably despise AI in particular, and definitely don't hate Photoshop or calculators, is that those products aren't destroying the planet.

Also, they're rarely forced on you. There are alternatives to these things (that doesn't quite work with calculators as an example, but hey ho - spreadsheets, or abacuses. Okay!) and so these things have to provide real, measurable value before you buy them.

Finally, they didn't absolutely piss on existing creators by stealing their work (and hence livelihood) in order to exist.

I sincerely hope the article below is spot on, and that AI is absolutely unsustainable in the medium or long term. The only reason it exists today is because big tech is front running the costs in the hope to establish dependency, so that when they price this tech according to its actual cost, there are enough subscribers unwilling to do without the tech, and they'll pay up.

https://www.wheresyoured.at/costs/ [External Link]

Fingers crossed.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Lovely looking game, and feels a bit more accessible than similar types of this genre.

That link you posted made me think that it would be wonderful if Steam could create a symlink, during PFX creation, for all that dross that makes finding the actual game content so tedious.

So create a "game" symbolic link for:
drive_c/users/steamuser/AppData/LocalLow/TheFarmerWasReplaced/TheFarmerWasReplaced

And that way, instead of
steamapps/compatdata/2060160/pfx/drive_c/users/steamuser/AppData/LocalLow/TheFarmerWasReplaced/TheFarmerWasReplaced/Saves/Save0/

You'd just have:
steamapps/compatdata/2060160/pfx/game/Saves/Save0/

A boy can dream.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I believe the problem is that buying a piece of media and feeding it into an algorithm to create a model isn't considered copyright infringement because the result is a piece of software rather than a copy of the original piece of media.

You're probably right, but that just means that copyright law needs to be updated.

If they want to create a new AI that's a great interior designer, but the creators of that AI need to knock doors and be shown the insides of people's houses - let's face it, they'd be told to do one.

The issue here is that they didn't have to knock doors and be let in. They just scraped everything they could find on the internet and considering all that data "free".

Even when it was provably not free, such as when Meta, absolutely scumbags that they are, scraped terrabytes of LibGen for pirated books, to train their shitty model. And then the ball-less judge ruled against the authors. Nothing about them breaking the law by torrenting LibGen, nah, just a weak excuse about "not dilating the market through their actions". Holy fuck, Zuckerberg makes me feel physically sick.

If you're still using Facebook or Insta after this, you have no soul. I can't judge you for Whatsapp because I know from personal experience how difficult it is to get people moved to alternatives, when they just don't care.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jun/26/meta-wins-ai-copyright-lawsuit-as-us-judge-rules-against-authors [External Link]

Remember Kazaa in the early 2000's? Remember that single mother being sued into oblivion because her son shared songs using it??

In Duluth, Minnesota, the recording industry sued Jammie Thomas-Rasset, a 30-year-old single mother. On 5 October 2007, Thomas was ordered to pay the six record companies (Sony BMG, Arista Records LLC, Interscope Records, UMG Recordings Inc., Capitol Records Inc. and Warner Bros. Records Inc.) $9,250 for each of the 24 songs they had focused on in this case.

(Where are those guys? She ended up owing over £2M - which was reduced to around £45K after YEARS of retrials because who the fuck thinks that anyone should be fined £2M for downloading/sharing files in 2003. Insane.)

Anyway. Clearly anything on the internet is free now. So that's nice.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

My biggest surprise is that so many game devs choose to self-report rather than keep it hush-hush to avoid turning principled potential buyers away. Does Steam penalize developers that don’t disclaim it?

Even if they ignore the link that lilovent posted, they risk absolutely insane backlash if they use it and are caught doing so by gamers, let alone Valve. Not sure what Valve's response would be, but the gamer response is brutal.

https://steamcommunity.com/app/1601570/discussions/0/604160267118483770/ [External Link]

And that was a game that only used it on placeholders in EA! They subsequently removed the AI-gen placeholders and recovered some semblence of respectability, but only after been absolutely dragged twice - once for using AI, and then again for their shitty "it was only in placeholders" response.

View this comment - View article - View full comments