Waiting for Debian testing to get Plasma 5.18. Plasma and KDE frameworks uploads are lagging a lot in Debian these days.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

It doesn't have to be their games, but it can be something that's released for the platform, using its features that Geforce Now simply can't have. Geforce now is not a platform for releasing games, it's a Windows VM renting service - they aren't releasing anything and no one is releasing for them. Approach is quite different by design.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Google clearly know the above, so I assume they aren't planning to drop it because of their own approach, that would be weird. Though given their past history, anything can happen.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Purple Library GuyThis is all no doubt true but I'm not sure how much it matters to the average prospective customer.

I'm talking about Google. For customer it means there will be games on Stadia that aren't possible to run on Geforce Now. That alone is already a differentiator that will bring them users.

My point is, they aren't really competing 1:1, so I don't buy the argument that Google are doing something wrong in comparison with other stream services or they are behind them. They are actually ahead and they are doing something different.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: rustybroomhandleThe NVidia option lets you play way more games than Stadia does. Of all the options, Stadia is the weakest.

That doesn't matter. They simply offer you a VM where you can play your Windows games (which you already bought on Steam and such). Google offer something different - a platform to make new games. I'd say Nvidia isn't even a competitor, they are a different category service. The only comparable thing I see is something like Amazon's Lumberyard backend (not Lumberyard itself). Amazon just need to tune it for running actual rendering on the server.

The difference is important. I.e. Stadia allows making games that can't run on a desktop, they need server infrastructure. Nvidia doesn't offer that and it doesn't look like they plan to.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: rustybroomhandleSadly for them, I think Stadia have already lost the cloud gaming war.

Why would they? They have more expertise than other cloud gaming providers. Nvidia is nowhere a competitor to Google in this sense, not even close. And Nvidia aren't even trying to compete with them in the sense of offering games. They simply offer cloud VMs (Windows only for that matter). So it's a different service in a sense.

Google actually enable multiplayer games that are based on their platform. Nvidia doesn't have anything like that. I'd say Google's main competitor in this sense is Amazon, not Nvidia.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

We should make a wiki somewhere, for games that came out for desktop Linux due to coming to Stadia first. That's really the main interest in Stadia for me for now.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

It's an expansion with a major version update for the base game, which includes bug fixes and etc.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

They have their own engine and are using Vulkan by the way.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Yeah, I know that there is a removal of stats for not updated accounts. Some put the info in once and don't update. But general downwards trend means that the number of people who are actually updating them regularly is going down. Or may be the number of new users who fill in the info is going down. That's what I was wondering about.

The extra privacy feature just adds another variable to this.

May be you can make stats for these metrics:

1. Number of people who updated their info in the last month (or confirmed that their configuration didn't change).
2. Number of new users who filled in the info.

View this comment - View article - View full comments