Quoting: ArehandoroA bit late maybe, but has someone tried the game now that the patch is official?

Is it official? The last update on GOG is Patch 1.4.4.f (07 September 2017). I thought their patches were still beta and they didn't release them yet.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: GuestI'm confused - what are people arguing about?

I'm really not sure. Above some didn't like the idea that open development is a better model, and tried bringing counter examples, which weren't even to the point.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: nitroflowThat trailer doesn't seem any better then SotA quality though...

You can't really see any performance metrics there, so it's hard to say. I wonder if they'll use Vulkan with Unity for it.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I didn't back it, but reports of poor quality are upsetting. Meanwhile, another Ultima related game - Underworld Ascendant by OtherSide is supposedly progressing well: https://otherside-e.com/wp/update-aelita-the-abyss-and-more/ [External Link]

View video on youtube.com

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: MayeulCI read that as Steamworks requires Steam, not the other way around (Steam doesn't require Steamworks).

Exactly.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: jensIt would have been a lot more polite if you would have at least acknowledged jaycee's experience. Instead you completely ignored what he said in your direct response and just posted a general essay.

He was answering to my point, not I to his. However, saying that open development "doesn't necessarily help at all" because it doesn't guarantee fast bug fixing was not the topic I was talking about. How fast something is fixed doesn't depend on it.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: jens@jaycee wrote a concrete example where cooperate support worked better for him than FOSS support.

For him, but not for others who had no idea about his bug report, and didn't know whether it was fixed, whether there are workarounds or the bug will be around forever. How would they know, since the whole bug reporting process isn't public? Many probably filed multiple duplicate bug reports for the same problem because of it, wasting theirs and others' time.

So there was nothing to demonstrate how open development is not better than closed one for these matters that I listed above. Whether some bug is fixed faster or slower is a completely separate topic. Others brought above examples of bugs that Nvidia didn't fix for years.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

What about GOG? They released original game there.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: elmapulGREAT, now we have 3 competing standards...

https://github.com/ValveSoftware/openvr [External Link]
http://www.osvr.org/what-is-osvr.html [External Link]
https://www.khronos.org/openxr [External Link]

the question is wich one should be followed?

I think only OpenXR is a collaborative effort, so the answer is obvious.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: jensHe wont see your point due to his unconditional love for Open Source and FOSS in general.

This point is not about attitude towards FOSS. That's just how open development operates, bugs are open and you can track progress (unlike blob, closed driven development as can be expected). It doesn't equal a guarantee that your bug will magically get higher priority than otherwise. However, since Mesa developers asked to make a special page just for games, @jaycee can go ahead and use it, before complaining.

View this comment - View article - View full comments