Quoting: jensBut you do know that it is kind of hypocrite if you are advocating Linux everywhere but would buy lets say Tomb Raider 2013 for Windows when there is a Linux port?

I wouldn't buy Tomb Raider 2013 at all. It's not available DRM-free.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: jensThat is a rather evasive response to my question. :)

Point is, I don't see Aspyr or Feral putting any effort into going outside of Steam lock-in.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: jensI know Feral/Aspyr games are not on your favorite distribution channel

I don't like Steam exclusivity any more than Windows exclusivity. But when DRM is thrown in, it makes it even worse.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: jensStated differently, wine shouldn't compete with Feral or Aspyr titles, that would hurt the Linux market.

For me it doesn't :) I barely see any Feral or Aspyr titles on GOG ;)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: jensStart your own company and do it better ;)

There are rational companies out there! They already sell games for Linux, as well as sell DRM-free.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: jensMost owners and Executives I have spoken have my deepest respects. It is really not so easy to ensure that a company survives and to bear their responsibility.

I have no respect for control freaks who push DRM everywhere, while knowing it has nothing to do with increasing profits. I suspect Linux situation falls in the same irrational behavior category.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: jensBut from their point of view it is still about just making money, or in case of publishers: trying everything they think is needed to max out their investments.

Urge for power is different from urge for money. They can combine together, but they can actually be conflicting. I.e. these execs can even rationally understand, that something they do would mean lost profits, but they still would do it, to feel more control. That's quite irrational from the pure financial point of view. That's why I said, don't just use common sense logic with them - it won't explain their behaviors in certain cases.

Here is a good example of this [External Link].

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: jens

Quoting: ShmerlTheir mindset is not something you should evaluate using common sense.

It's actually pretty easy, it's just about making (lots of) money. Really, that's the only motivation. ;)

Not necessarily. You are again using common sense approach with them. Sure, normal business strives to make money. But legacy publishers are dominated by backwards thinking execs who more often than money covet control. Urge for power can lead them to do things that cost them money, rather than the opposite.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: jensWhen earning money on Linux is possible you will attract the big publishers

I wouldn't bet on it. It's already possible to earn money on Linux releases. That doesn't seem to wake most of the legacy publishers up. Their mindset is not something you should evaluate using common sense.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Alm888this added emulation will be as thin and transparent as possible ("slim" Vulkan instead of "bulky" OpenGL can help with that).

Yep, that's the point. But Wine is doing a good job of translating D3D11 into OpenGL, so I don't think they should spend time on re-doing it in Vulkan, at least not until it's already finished as is.

View this comment - View article - View full comments