Quoting: TT_ZXWell a GTX 1070 is over $400 NZ (about $284 US) cheaper here at the moment, so I won't be getting a Vega 64 any time soon. It gulps considerably more power too and consequently runs hotter. I look forward to the day when AMD can compete with NVIDIA on these fronts so I get kick NVIDIA to the curb.

GTX 1070 should be compared to Vega 56, not Vega 64. And there comparison makes more sense.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

On a side note, is there any point in it? Do Feral actually try asking owners about porting most requested games? I.e. for example, what was the result of requesting The Witcher 3? Feral were asked to port it for a long time already.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: M@GOidThe results in Phoronix are totally encouraging on the Linux side. Vega performance compared to Nvidia is better than on Windows. I'm probably getting one Vega 56 in a couple of months, once the third party coolers are available. It will be THE card to get considering price, power consumption and performance on Linux.

I'll be waiting for Sapphire Nitro version.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: operaTDP of 345 Watts is just insane.

Yeah, that's why I'll probably get Vega 56. I don't need some crazy resolutions so far.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Linas

Quoting: wolfyrionThe biggest surprise that I had with GOG is when I discovered that is a Cypriot based company :D ...

I could have sworn they are from Poland.

They are. Their headquarters are in Warsaw. I bet the whole Cyprus registration is for some legal / financial reasons. It's basically a formality, but not sure what for.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I started Tyranny recently.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

What about DRM-free releases? I'm mostly interested in their potential World of Darkness / Vampire The Masquerade games (since Paradox bought White Wolf). I don't really care about clients and cloud saves.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Whitewolfe80Doesnt matter if does or does not its not going anywhere.

DRM highlights the conflict of their interest for power vs money. No DRM means more profit, but having DRM means they have a feeling of control and ability to dictate others what to do (even if it's fake). Some simply run after power, no matter the cost. Some are more rational.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Whitewolfe80Exactly which is why is it's never going away as much as it may get some more customers in personally I have sold out to valve ages ago i own some games through gog but have just pretty much accepted Steams dominance.

DRM only drives customers away, not the other way around.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: slaapliedjeI can't seem to find it now, but at one point in time I had seen that there was supposedly a law that Microsoft lobbied for that stated a computer could not be sold without an operating system installed. Some companies got around that by installing FreeDOS on the computers they sold.

Can anyone confirm that, it may have just been something I read that was anti-MS at the time, sounded like something they would do, like jacking up the OEM price if companies tried to sell computers with BeOS.

Not a law, but they blackmailed OEMs, that they'll charge more for Windows, if they'll sell computers without an OS. Though I don't think it should have prevented them from selling computers with Linux, though who knows what other shady deals MS could make in secret. That's just one that became public.

See https://web.archive.org/web/20150714080353/http://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f3800/msjudgex.htm#iiie [External Link]

View this comment - View article - View full comments