Support us on Patreon to keep GamingOnLinux alive. This ensures all of our main content remains free for everyone. Just good, fresh content! Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal. You can also buy games using our partner links for GOG and Humble Store.
We do often include affiliate links to earn us some pennies. See more here.

Sales Statistics From Super Win the Game, All Platforms Did Badly

By - | Views: 23,149
YouTube Thumbnail
YouTube videos require cookies, you must accept their cookies to view. View cookie preferences.
Accept Cookies & Show   Direct Link
The developer of Super Win the Game has written a blog post about how Super Win the Game did sales wise.

QuoteSo let’s talk sales figures. In twelve months, Super Win the Game has sold 7,640 copies across Steam, Humble, itch.io, IndieBox, and direct sales, with an average unit price of $4.98, generating roughly $38,000 of gross revenue. By my napkin math, this translates to about $18,500 after-tax earnings for my household.


QuoteMac and Linux account for about 10.25% of sales (6.25% and 4% respectively), so again by napkin math, I would estimate I’ve earned roughly $1,900 on those platforms. They continue to be a net loss for now. Reaching profitability isn’t totally outside the realm of possibility, however, since there is minimal cost involved in supporting them now that the core engine work is done.


That's really not a lot of sales for all platforms put together, but the thing to takeaway here is that SWTG is a very niche game. It's not my type of game, and I don't personally ever plan to buy it. I imagine a lot of people also feel the same way about it. That's not to say it isn't a good game, I just burnt myself out on retro type games a long time ago.

The actual percentage of sales from our platform is actually a lot higher than most other indie developers that we spoke to, so that by itself is actually quite nice to see. However, you may think that 4% from Linux is good, as it's above our actual surveyed market-share from things like the Steam Survey, but the major publishers and developers aren't going to jump into bed with Linux for that. Also, if the game sold better in general, the extra sales would likely normalise the Linux percentage down to where we have seen it from most other developers in the 1-3% band.

You may think I am being negative here, and I am from a certain point of view. I am a realist, and we aren't gaining any ground yet. I'm not going to sugar-coat anything, we need to grow and that's not debatable.

We also need developers to branch out some more, platformers and retro styles are becoming far, far too common.

You can find Super Win the Game on Steam, Humble Store and Itch.io.

Thanks for pointing it out Till. Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
0 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly came back to check on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. Find me on Mastodon.
See more from me
The comments on this article are closed.
33 comments
Page: «2/4»
  Go to:

seb24 Sep 29, 2015
Quoting: liamdawePercentage wise it's higher than normal, but a percentage is meaningless when you look at the figures I quoted from him.
I can't agree here. Percentage are interesting because you can see Mac + Linux at 10%. The figures about sales are low in the global. It's not something in relation with Linux.

And you can quote this part too :
QuoteThat’s not amazing, but it’s not nothing either. Alone, that’s not quite enough to pay rent, much less completely cover the cost of developing another game, much less actually turn a profit. But in conjunction with my remaining savings, income from contract work, additional revenue from Eldritch, and my wife’s income, we’re staying afloat.

So in general is no doing any profit on this game for the moment.
wolfyrion Sep 29, 2015
$16,603.75 for M$ Windows
$1,156.25 for Mac
$740 for Linux

My opinion is that it doesnt matter the $ of sales in each OS but the developer have to see the whole picture globally instead of focusing on each OS.

Actually he should consider the Linux and Mac ports as a Bonus Sales! :)

I dont know how hard it was to port to Linux and Mac but I just hope the whole journey to port his game to Mac and Linux has teach him a lot of things so he can use what he had learned in the future with less hassles.

I just wish him good luck in his future projects and hopefully with the rise of Steam Machines his Linux sales will be increased as well ...


Last edited by wolfyrion on 29 September 2015 at 1:57 pm UTC
Liam Dawe Sep 29, 2015
Quoting: seb24
Quoting: liamdawePercentage wise it's higher than normal, but a percentage is meaningless when you look at the figures I quoted from him.
I can't agree here. Percentage are interesting because you can see Mac + Linux at 10%. The figures about sales are low in the global. It's not something in relation with Linux.

And you can quote this part too :
QuoteThat’s not amazing, but it’s not nothing either. Alone, that’s not quite enough to pay rent, much less completely cover the cost of developing another game, much less actually turn a profit. But in conjunction with my remaining savings, income from contract work, additional revenue from Eldritch, and my wife’s income, we’re staying afloat.

So in general is no doing any profit on this game for the moment.

That's part of my point, even if it sold well, the percentage is still low and would still have given very little money.
Xzyl Sep 29, 2015
Quoting: Syke
Quoting: linuxgamerIts not bad if the company has 100+ programmers of which only 2 do Linux porting (no allusion to Techland intended). If your a single person and have spent 10-15% of your time into that this will be no bonus when your game isn't that a big seller.

I always do multi-platform. I find that if the project is designed for multi-platform up front, the cost is virtually 0. Maintaining multi-platform code helps find bugs which is actually a huge cost savings!

On the other hand, if you take a completed single-target project and try to port to another platform, you will end up spending a lot.

You hit the nail on the head so hard it's on it's to fiji... pretty sure I saw that quote floating around here somewhere.

Anyhow it's insane to target a platform (or specific hardware thanks to this practice we get nVidia only games) for development then port afterwards, so many good engines do it for you. Even if you're creating your own engine there are many tools that are already cross platform SDL1/2 or SFML come to mind instantly especially for a low production/performance game which looking at the stills this game certainly is. A better plan instead of shouldering VERY high expectations on the Linux community with a port of this little game would of been just to focus cross platform on their next project and it would look better from a overall income perspective since it's basically free ports.

Support costs on all platforms Liam, if n hours is dedicated to this everyday issues get backed up but there isn't actually a cost overhead unless he himself/they themselves can't fix the problems in house or have to hire an additional programmer for lack of knowledge on said platform.
Liam Dawe Sep 29, 2015
Quoting: XzylSupport costs on all platforms Liam, if n hours is dedicated to this everyday issues get backed up but there isn't actually a cost overhead unless he himself/they themselves can't fix the problems in house or have to hire an additional programmer for lack of knowledge on said platform.

A very obvious point, yes support costs on all platforms, but the more platforms you have: the more issues you will get.

There is always an overhead: time.
opera Sep 29, 2015
I don't get the negative attiude of this article. It's not Linux fault that a game gets low sales numbers overall. All what matters here (from our Linux based point of view) is the percentage of Linux sales and that number is quite nice in this case. Cheers!
Liam Dawe Sep 29, 2015
Quoting: operaI don't get the negative attiude of this article. It's not Linux fault that a game gets low sales numbers overall. All what matters here (from our Linux based point of view) is the percentage of Linux sales and that number is quite nice in this case. Cheers!

I deal in harsh truths sometimes, I don't fanboy everything about Linux gaming to sugar-coat it.
mulletdeath Sep 29, 2015
Huh, that's weird, I would have thought this game sold pretty well across all platforms, actually. I guess that's what I get for assuming that just because I bought it and liked it that everyone else did.


As for the game itself, apart from being brutally hard in some spots it's really not a bad game at all.
AndyMcDandyCDN Sep 29, 2015
It frustrates me when indie devs release a small niche title and then complain about low sales on Linux. Companies like Farsight Studios seem to be paying attention to those comments because they use the excuse of low sales for other dev titles as their reason for not bringing The Pinball Arcade to Linux.
kit89 Sep 29, 2015
The game appears to have low sales across the board. I'm curious whether total sales managed to cover the development of the entire game.

As time moves on this game may provide a respectable stream of sales on a yearly basis, perhaps not enough to live on, but maybe a nice bonus at christmas.

It appears this game didn't have the mass user appeal needed to make 10% Mac and Linux sales a respectable profit margin.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
The comments on this article are closed.