Use Reddit? Come join our Reddit Sub as another place to follow the community!
We use affiliate links to earn us some pennies. Learn more.

Unity AI out in Open Beta to give developers the fabled "make game" button

By -
Last updated: 5 May 2026 at 8:51 am UTC

AI, AI, AI - now in your game engine too! Unity has rolled out Unity AI in Open Beta that will apparently help games be created faster.

The trailer, that you can watch below, I will jokingly say is Unity adding in a "make a game for me" button. Because, that really does seem to be what they're playing on here. We've long seen jokes in game developer circles about how people expect developers just to be able to add in things at the press of a button - and now with the power of AI, they might actually be able to.

YouTube Thumbnail
YouTube videos require cookies, you must accept their cookies to view. View cookie preferences.
Accept Cookies & Show   Direct Link

We're going from "asset flips" to "AI flips" now right?

Jokes and hyperbole aside, some parts of this really could be helpful, but it still comes with all the usual caveats when it comes to anything involving generative AI. Their AI policy page notes pretty clearly it uses Google Gemini, so the usual copyright issues come in here - who actually owns the code and models it generates? And, who understands it? If people are just entering prompts - what are they learning? Not a lot. Creating games faster maybe, but without the understanding and artistic intent behind it.

How do you feel about games being made with AI like this?

Article taken from GamingOnLinux.com.
2 Likes
About the author -
author picture
I am the owner of GamingOnLinux. After discovering Linux back in the days of Mandrake in 2003, I constantly checked on the progress of Linux until Ubuntu appeared on the scene and it helped me to really love it. You can reach me easily by emailing GamingOnLinux directly. You can follow me personally on Mastodon [External Link].
See more from me
All posts need to follow our rules. Please hit the Report Flag icon on any post that breaks the rules or contains illegal / harmful content. Readers can also email us for any issues or concerns.
9 comments

poke86 a day ago
Because faster is famously always better when it comes to game development.
User Avatar
I dislike Unity since they have build in the call home spy functionality: singleplayer games that send telemetry to Unity etc. Now they force beginners to create slop games with stolen data instead of learning how to make games. I am sure, that low level entry point will lead in more slop games pretty soon, where people think they can make money flooding the stores with generated slop games.

Could it be that too many serious game devs switched to Godot or Unreal Engine after their previous enshittifications, so they decided to pull newcomers with "here everyone can create games" or companies to tell "your game studio can do the same work with 5x less artists in half the time", not saying that many people don't want to play slop?

8 years ago I thought that neuronal network algorithm will be a great deal for game development, not because it can generate assets, but because it can change or calculate data on runtime. My hopes were that usernames can be voice generated by TTS while all static texts are spoken by actual voice artists. Other hopes were that animating clothes physically correct without clipping to a much lower performance impact than doing actual math will become a standard technique build in engines. Everything trained ethical correctly of course (because it does not require large models). The reality is, biggest companies are allowed to steal all data to sell them combined via a so called "model"-file ... or worse, just selling the access to it ... to generate the whole game instead. And instead of cool technical improvements to simulate visual physics we get double FPS fake images that increases the latency.

If technologies can be used in a good way and a bad way, why we always decide to use them in the worst way possible?

Edit:
I am not afraid AI will replace serious game development any time soon. But game stores will look more and more like YouTube: 80% slop and 20% actual games on the search results and for little Indies it will get even harder to get found. So less people can live from that work, even if these games are good.

Last edited by PlayingOnLinuxphone on 5 May 2026 at 11:15 am UTC
Jarmer a day ago
User Avatar
Ahhhhhh yes this is what I have always wanted. For the longest time, I have told my wife "you know, with my limited game time, what I REALLY REALLY REALLLLLLLLYYYYYYYYYY want is a flood of extremely low quality garbage that I have to sift through to get to anything worth playing. That's what I dream of"

And now it's coming true! WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 🤬
Brendan a day ago
User Avatar
Even before this--even before ChatGPT launched, to be honest--there were more new games published on Steam alone in a week than I could have gotten around to playing in a year. Then add in those that are published on other game stores, consoles, phone app stores, and itch.io. If you want to go back further, shovelware was a drag even in the twentieth century. I have no idea what the promoters of this technology would consider the best case scenario for it; I'm not sure they do either. But I'm certain it will mean more crap, less quality, and reduced visibility and sales income for people who actually invest time and care in their work.
Berny23 a day ago
User Avatar
The future of slop games looks ... pretty terrible.
ScottCarammell a day ago
Godot is free forever and supports C# for programming by the way
Savor592 a day ago
User Avatar
Finally we can give lazy and talentless people money for generic and thoughtless AI slop games! How long have I waited for this day!
Philadelphus 9 hours ago
Quoting: BrendanEven before this--even before ChatGPT launched, to be honest--there were more new games published on Steam alone in a week than I could have gotten around to playing in a year. Then add in those that are published on other game stores, consoles, phone app stores, and itch.io. If you want to go back further, shovelware was a drag even in the twentieth century.
The [video game crash of 1983](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_game_crash_of_1983) – 43 years ago, almost half a century – was due to "several factors, including market saturation in the number of video game consoles and available games, many of which were of poor quality" (according to Wikipedia, emphasis mine). Yet somehow we keep acting like this is an unprecedented situation no one's ever had to deal with before.
Jarmer 2 hours ago
User Avatar
my friends ... just go onto the switch store.

It's slopmageddon, but not only that, it's that plus turbo chargers. With some nitrous. It's a sea of dollar 99 games that are literally worthless but GUESS WHAT they're still on there. I guess the people that make these games bank on the fact that it costs them less than $1 to make this game, but if they sell literally two copies on the switch store, they are making a profit.

Yay.
While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:

Reward Tiers: Patreon Logo Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal Logo PayPal.

This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!

You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register