While you're here, please consider supporting GamingOnLinux on:
Reward Tiers:
Patreon. Plain Donations: 
PayPal.
This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!
You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Reward Tiers:
Patreon. Plain Donations: PayPal.This ensures all of our main content remains totally free for everyone! Patreon supporters can also remove all adverts and sponsors! Supporting us helps bring good, fresh content. Without your continued support, we simply could not continue!
You can find even more ways to support us on this dedicated page any time. If you already are, thank you!
Login / Register
- The "video game preservation service" Myrient is shutting down in March
- SpaghettiKart the Mario Kart 64 fan-made PC port gets a big upgrade
- California law to require operating systems to check your age
- Run your own band in the pixel art management game Legends of Rock
- The OrangePi Neo gaming handheld with Manjaro Linux is now "on ice" due to component prices
- > See more over 30 days here
How to setup OpenMW for modern Morrowind on Linux / SteamOS and Steam Deck
How to install Hollow Knight: Silksong mods on Linux, SteamOS and Steam Deck
It would be nice to acquire tools, or features, through the site on the user end to:
- Pull a submission that is pending (maybe preserving the copy)
- Be notified about a pending status or rejection (with a few notes from the admin to improve or be warned about said content)
- Revise a submission (if rejected on lack of quality)
Needless to say, mistakes happen, and a simple click is a finger away from occurring. :)
Likewise, if submissions increase, quality control tools may be a nice way to ease newer user's into submitting better content without keeping them too much in the dark of what has occurred. Of course, to maybe lessen potential nagging or bothering an admin editor. :)
If some of these features exist, I apologize, I am unaware of the current tool set provided.
2) On it being accepted or denied, it automatically emails you
3) Yeah, we will eventually add something like this, but the problem is when it's sent to us, we tend to make a fair few edits ourselves between the editors, so it might be tricky to do.
2) Ah, thanks. Noticed the accepted part, have yet to check the denied one. Still would be cool to have denied notes. Though I guess I could just email about it for the future.
3) Perhaps an admin call for a motion to flat out "deny for revision" before the admin revision takes place? Good to know its planned for down the road.
Personally I haven't had any issues submitting so far. Though I won't take offence to a rejection. This is where a few notes of improvement comes in handy, for me, at least.
I guess its entirely possible someone might not see it the same way though, and then irrationally flipping out over a critique.
3) We have an article locking system in place, so it can easily hook into it once it's fully completed, poke me again in a month or so :)